I am new but not new?

[Ross Dolan]

I think that's a fair response. I think that's enough to establish indifference as a reason in addition to hatred/anger.

So do I...which is why I offered it.

Violence and self defense are two different things (even though they both involve the use of force).

Look...if an instance of self-defense involved elements of violence...IT IS VIOLENCE.

You apparently are locked in and probably will not acknowledge that...but that is your problem, not mine. Happens a lot when in a discussion with MAGA people.

You apparently suppose that because I disagree with Trump and his policies, I must hate him.

I do not. I do not hate anyone. I just don't.

Laugh if you want to. I suspect that is because you cannot conceive of disagreeing with someone and yet still not hating him/her.

I do not hate Trump despite the fact that I disagree with him on many things...and consider him to be a clueless, classless individuals. If anything, I pity him. He must have been raised in a way to make him like that.

Unfortunate.

Just as it is that you were raised to think the things you do.

Not at all. You do get things right sometimes.

I often get things right...and when I am wrong, I almost always acknowledge that I am wrong and apologize.

You, apparently.

I most assuredly do not. But if it makes your life more livable to think I do...go for it.

Did you see the comma before the word 'and'? Those are two separate imperative clauses:

• Clause 1: "Just don't incite violence."
• Clause 2: "Condemn the people who DO incite violence."

Take the sentence to a grammarian at a local university...and ask his/her opinion. The sentence structure is poor...and I am pretty sure that is what you will be told.

 

[Into the Night]

So do I...which is why I offered it.



Look...if an instance of self-defense involved elements of violence...IT IS VIOLENCE.

By definition. It also justified violence. Not all acts of self defense have to be violent. Compositional error fallacy.

You apparently are locked in and probably will not acknowledge that...but that is your problem, not mine. Happens a lot when in a discussion with MAGA people.

MAGA isn't a person, Doofan.

You apparently suppose that because I disagree with Trump and his policies, I must hate him.

You have stated you hate him.

I do not. I do not hate anyone. I just don't.

You have stated you hate him.

Laugh if you want to. I suspect that is because you cannot conceive of disagreeing with someone and yet still not hating him/her.

You have stated you hate him.

I do not hate Trump despite the fact that I disagree with him on many things...and consider him to be a clueless, classless individuals. If anything, I pity him. He must have been raised in a way to make him like that.

Mott and Bailey fallacy.

Unfortunate.

Just as it is that you were raised to think the things you do.



I often get things right...and when I am wrong, I almost always acknowledge that I am wrong and apologize.

No, you don't.

I most assuredly do not. But if it makes your life more livable to think I do...go for it.

Take the sentence to a grammarian at a local university...and ask his/her opinion. The sentence structure is poor...and I am pretty sure that is what you will be told.

Courtier fallacy.

 

[Guno צְבִי]

Apparently you've already forgotten the whole invention of the Tea Party and why -- because of Obama. It's slipped your mind completely that proto-MAGATs were calling for his impeachment and removal before he was even sworn in. You must have not seen the videos and photos of Tea Party rallies with signs saying "We came unarmed -- this time" -- and the rallies at which they WERE armed. You forgot all about the #TangerineTyrant and his bullshit about Obama's birth certificate, didn't you? That wasn't racist or anything, right?

Arby is widely known as borderline retarded from a combination of his births circumstance and his upbringing around a gun nut . Arby was taught the victim mentality and white grievance