So the Smithsonian can’t show that slavery was bad?

Bah, woketard modern day cookie cutter preachers are dumb.
A cousin had his funeral at one of their churches. So canned. My family's stuff was real, but that preacher and the whole thing was cringe.
That cousin was 200% a better preacher than he was, and not even all that into it.
While cracking good jokes, even.
I am making observations, not value judgments.

The independent evangelical churches are outperforming the old Mainline Protestant and Catholic communities in the USA, and the observant person might ask the question why?
 
LOL, that's the first I've heard of drive in movie pants.

Good point on marketing the church in the 21st century.
This evangelical church was like attending a Christian rock concert. They don't fuck around with old fashioned hymns. They were playing modern, contemporary Christian music with electric guitars, keyboards, drums, electric bass.

That would never pass muster in a Episcopalian or Lutheran church!
Their music may be modern, but their minds are still in the dark ages.
 
Their music may be modern, but their minds are still in the dark ages.

I was never a fan of strict biblical literalism.

I'm sure 200 years from now, people will pass judgement on us. People who eat meat today might someday be considered unethical barbarians, because the livestock industry is predicated on the cruel confinement, suffering, and terrifying slaughter of sentient mammals.
 
I was never a fan of strict biblical literalism.

I'm sure 200 years from now, people will pass judgement on us. People who eat meat today might someday be considered unethical barbarians, because the livestock industry is predicated on the cruel confinement, suffering, and terrifying slaughter of sentient mammals.
Any bets on how many atheists love beef?
 
I was never a fan of strict biblical literalism.

I'm sure 200 years from now, people will pass judgement on us. People who eat meat today might someday be considered unethical barbarians, because the livestock industry is predicated on the cruel confinement, suffering, and terrifying slaughter of sentient mammals.
In 200 years, they’re more likely to be passing judgement on our political situation than our eating habits.
 
Any bets on how many atheists love beef?
I think the bad news for Democrats is that if a vocal minority in the party creates the narrative, our party is going to continue to lose in the Midwestern and Appalachian states for a generation to come.

It doesn't matter how good of a healthcare and minimum wage policy you have, if a vocal minority allows right-wing propagandists to paint the party as virulently anti-christian, and that we only care about atheists, undocumented migrants, and transgender NCAA athletes. That is just never going to fly in the economically populist but socially conservative Midwest and Appalachian states. You can't win elections with just atheists.

It wasn't that long ago that Democrats were very competitive across much of the Midwest and Appalachia.
 
In 200 years, they’re more likely to be passing judgement on our political situation than our eating habits.
Right, something to think about before we jump on our high horses and pat ourselves too much on the back for progressing past traditional western values and rituals.
 
Right, something to think about before we pat ourselves too much on the back for progressing past traditional western values and rituals.
I read once that tradition is peer pressure from dead people.

Tradition is fine, I guess, but at some point attitudes and practices need to be re-evaluated.

I think it was Jefferson who thought the entire Constitution should be reworked every 20 years or so. He said the earth belongs to the living, not the dead.
 
Of course you would. You're a beef-eater. Like MAGAts, "It's all about me and my personal comfort".
There you go again, dumbfuck, pulling shit out of your ass with no fucking idea what you’re talking about.

Think just a little bit, Festus. What does atheism have to do with one’s dietary habits?
 
Right, something to think about before we jump on our high horses and pat ourselves too much on the back for progressing past traditional western values and rituals.
Something else you'll never see an atheist advocate:

“Our society must make it right and possible for old people not to fear the young or be deserted by them, for the test of a civilization is the way that it cares for its helpless members.” -- Pearl Buck
 
There you go again, dumbfuck, pulling shit out of your ass with no fucking idea what you’re talking about.

Think just a little bit, Festus. What does atheism have to do with one’s dietary habits?
I have no doubt your anger issues cause problems in your personal life. Sad.

Life is choices. We can choose to be ethical or not. You've made it clear that you don't care about ethics or morals, only what is good for you. It's a pretty common attitude among atheists like you and Perry Penis-Puller.
 
I read once that tradition is peer pressure from dead people.

Tradition is fine, I guess, but at some point attitudes and practices need to be re-evaluated.

I think it was Jefferson who thought the entire Constitution should be reworked every 20 years or so. He said the earth belongs to the living, not the dead.
That makes sense.
 
Something else you'll never see an atheist advocate:

“Our society must make it right and possible for old people not to fear the young or be deserted by them, for the test of a civilization is the way that it cares for its helpless members.” -- Pearl Buck
Some of the New Atheists belatedly became a little alarmed at the demise of Christianity in Western Europe. Richard Dawkins said he is basically a cultural Christian, and appreciates living in a society where the Christian ethos, Christian zeitgeist, and Christian traditions are upheld.

I think he probably started worrying and realizing that as he and Hitchens were seeking to destroy Christianity, Islam, anarchism, moral relativism, and other ideologies were moving into the void to replace it among young adults. Atheism doesn't have a universal ethos or system of thought to sell itself, and Hitchens admits that is a problem, because many people still want to find some universal truth and objectively true value system to aspire towards.
 
Something else you'll never see an atheist advocate:

“Our society must make it right and possible for old people not to fear the young or be deserted by them, for the test of a civilization is the way that it cares for its helpless members.” -- Pearl Buck
Once again, Jethro, nothing to do with atheism.
 
I have no doubt your anger issues cause problems in your personal life. Sad.

Life is choices. We can choose to be ethical or not. You've made it clear that you don't care about ethics or morals, only what is good for you. It's a pretty common attitude among atheists like you and Perry Penis-Puller.
You’ve made it clear that you have zero critical thinking skills. For whatever reason, is it early onset dementia?, that you can’t seem to grasp a straightforward text. You twist them around in your mind and spew out some nonsensical bullshit.

Perhaps a visit to the doctor to undergo some cognitive function tests, because something ain’t right.
 
Some of the New Atheists belatedly became a little alarmed at the demise of Christianity in Western Europe. Richard Dawkins said he is basically a cultural Christian, and appreciates living in a society where the Christian ethos, Christian zeitgeist, and Christian traditions are upheld.

I think he probably started worrying and realizing that as he and Hitchens were seeking to destroy Christianity, Islam, anarchism, moral relativism, and other ideologies were moving into the void to replace it among young adults. Atheism doesn't have a universal ethos or system of thought to sell itself, and Hitchens admits that is a problem, because many people still want to find some universal truth and objectively true value system to aspire towards.
Here’s universal truth to aspire to:

You’re born
You die
Do and be the best you can in between.
 
Back
Top