The facts are not on Comey's side

Matt Dillon said:
Ya know, about that. I did my due diligence and researched that, and they were Cisco servers with a hardware firewall.
It was a professional setup.
That's secondary only to Linux with a hardware firewall. Pretty damn secure. Cisco dickweeds might argue that, but I'm right.
Now her Blackberry overseas, notsomuch. That was vulnerable as could be.
Russia's supercomputer couldn't have hacked Hillary's server. I think someone sent one of her underlings a trojan/RAT and they downloaded
it, on their machine that was just in Hillary's email chain with a few CC'd people. That's my gist of it.
Much of what Comey did is public record and documented in FBI files, I'm sure.
His telecommunications should have been public record, too.
I'm also pretty certain he's going down.
Click to expand...
Nope. The server was located IN HER HOME. I ran Microsoft Windows and used Microsoft Exchange as the email server.
Windows has ALMOST NOTHING for security. It is 'security by obscurity'. It can be easily breached by high school kids...even Russian ones.
It was set up by a friend of theirs.

When confronted, Hillary DESTROYED THE DISKS of the server, violating the law yet again.
 
Jarod said:
Not yet, just accused.

You are confusing him with Trump.
Click to expand...
Indicted = felon

He will always be a felon to me

I know you love to suck some Comey dick. But it is crazy that you think he is above the law and should be allowed to lie to Congress. My how your standards have changed Veruca.

Cognitive dissonance is a real bitch ain't it Veruca?
 
Into the Night said:
Nope. The server was located IN HER HOME. I ran Microsoft Windows and used Microsoft Exchange as the email server.
Windows has ALMOST NOTHING for security. It is 'security by obscurity'. It can be easily breached by high school kids...even Russian ones.
It was set up by a friend of theirs.

When confronted, Hillary DESTROYED THE DISKS of the server, violating the law yet again.
Click to expand...
It was a professionally set-up Cisco server with a hardware firewall. Very secure.
Most secure thing besides Linux server with a hardware firewall. I did my research on this..
because I wanted to know.
 
Teflon Don said:
Indicted = felon

He will always be a felon to me

I know you love to suck some Comey dick. But it is crazy that you think he is above the law and should be allowed to lie to Congress. My how your standards have changed Veruca.

Cognitive dissonance is a real bitch ain't it Veruca?
Click to expand...
Innocent until proven guilty! If indicted means Felon, Trump has many more than I thought!

I haven’t seen any evidence he lied to congress, neither have you. I don’t care about Comey one way or the other, but I do care about Justice and prosecutorial ethics.
 
Beyond what i cited prior this is also key. If this is based on the Congress testimony to Ted Cruz's question, which it appears to be people need to note the following.

Note that McCabe has stated he told Comey AFTER he released it and that COmey was OK with his action once informed. THAT IS NOT the same as Comey AUTHORIZING the release.

So on its face Comey and McCabe agree.





AI Summary:
Andrew McCabe claimed that he informed James Comey after he had authorized the leak to The Wall Street Journal — not before.



🔍 Breakdown of Their Conflicting Accounts:​


🗣️​


  • McCabe authorized the leak in late October 2016 (specifically Oct. 30) via his special counsel and an aide.
  • He later claimed that he told Comey afterward about the authorization.
  • McCabe has said this was standard practice and that Comey was informed after the fact, not in advance.

In McCabe’s telling, the disclosure was “cleared internally,” and he followed up with Comey after it happened to explain the context.
Click to expand...


------------------------------

AI Summary:

Here’s a summary of the key Ted Cruz question to James Comey (in a Senate hearing) that is often cited as central to the McCabe/Comey leak dispute:



🔍 The Question by Ted Cruz​


  • Cruz reminded Comey that in May 2017, under questioning by Senator Chuck Grassley, Comey had testified under oath:

    “Have you ever been an anonymous source in news reports about matters relating to the Trump investigation or the Clinton investigation?”
    → Comey answered: “Never.”
    “Have you ever authorized someone else at the FBI to be an anonymous source in news reports ...?”
    → Comey answered: “No.” cruz.senate.gov+2Washington Examiner+2
    Click to expand...
  • Cruz then confronted Comey with Andrew McCabe’s public and repeated claims that McCabe had been a source for The Wall Street Journal and that Comey had been aware of it or had authorized it. Washington Examiner+2Fox News+2
  • Cruz framed it like this:

    “Now, what Mr. McCabe is saying and what you testified to cannot both be true. One or the other is false. Who’s telling the truth?” Fox News+3MRCTV+3cruz.senate.gov+3
    Click to expand...
  • And he also asked:

    “So your testimony is you’ve never authorized anyone to leak? And Mr. McCabe, if he says the contrary, is he not telling the truth?”
    → Comey declined to characterize McCabe’s testimony as false, but said he stood by his own testimony. MRCTV+3wkjc.com+3cruz.senate.gov+3
    Click to expand...
 
QP! said:
Beyond what i cited prior this is also key. If this is based on the Congress testimony to Ted Cruz's question, which it appears to be people need to note the following.

Note that McCabe has stated he told Comey AFTER he released it and that COmey was OK with his action once informed. THAT IS NOT the same as Comey AUTHORIZING the release.

So on its face Comey and McCabe agree.





AI Summary:
Andrew McCabe claimed that he informed James Comey after he had authorized the leak to The Wall Street Journal — not before.



🔍 Breakdown of Their Conflicting Accounts:​


🗣️​


  • McCabe authorized the leak in late October 2016 (specifically Oct. 30) via his special counsel and an aide.
  • He later claimed that he told Comey afterward about the authorization.
  • McCabe has said this was standard practice and that Comey was informed after the fact, not in advance.




------------------------------

AI Summary:

Here’s a summary of the key Ted Cruz question to James Comey (in a Senate hearing) that is often cited as central to the McCabe/Comey leak dispute:



🔍 The Question by Ted Cruz​


  • Cruz reminded Comey that in May 2017, under questioning by Senator Chuck Grassley, Comey had testified under oath:

  • Cruz then confronted Comey with Andrew McCabe’s public and repeated claims that McCabe had been a source for The Wall Street Journal and that Comey had been aware of it or had authorized it. Washington Examiner+2Fox News+2
  • Cruz framed it like this:

  • And he also asked:

Click to expand...
^The Democrat media spin parroted. :rolleyes2:
 
Matt Dillon said:
It was a professionally set-up Cisco server with a hardware firewall. Very secure.
Most secure thing besides Linux server with a hardware firewall. I did my research on this..
because I wanted to know.
Click to expand...
It was in a hermetically sealed mayonnaise jar on Funk & Wagnall's Porch.

The reality, the protections on commercial grade data centers are extremely weak compared to the protections required on servers that are going to, and this one did, handle classified information. Even after the bleach bit they found over 100 emails that had information that was classified at the time she sent them.

She failed to protect classified information, the FBI stated the server had been compromised, this handling of this server was against the law, and had I done this when I had clearances and worked in SCIFs in the Navy I would have gone to prison. I watched folks get punished, sometimes even jail time, for simple mistakes when handling classified information, let alone a purposeful violation of the law (using a private server for government email itself was a violation, let alone putting classified info on it). What she did was a flat violation of the law and should have been prosecuted, if we are to pretend that there are not "two different justice systems" then she would have.

IMHO, we need to hold our representatives to even higher standards than we expect from the proles rather than constantly let them walk free because of who they marry or what job they happened to have held. It should be the "proles" that get the benefit of the doubt, not the "powerful" folks that we elect to represent us.
 
archives said:
Well, that’s it, Comey’s guilty, some nobody’s tweet proves it

The sad part is that MAGA like the above poster believes anything the see in a tweet if it concurs with what they want to be true
Click to expand...
It definitely shows heavy bias from the top man of the FBI.
As do his actions and his successor's actions.
IMO what they did was criminal. Makes Watergate look like small potatoes.
They spied on Trump's campaign to get dirt using the power of the government to share with Democrats and still came up with bupkis.
So then they invented things. Yeah, they should go to prison.
Comey is a criminally sociopathic dickhead and Wray is a lapdog of the same ilk.
As are McCabe, Strzok, and Page.
 
Damocles said:
It was in a hermetically sealed mayonnaise jar on Funk & Wagnall's Porch.

The reality, the protections on commercial grade data centers are extremely weak compared to the protections required on servers that are going to, and this one did, handle classified information. Even after the bleach bit they found over 100 emails that had information that was classified at the time she sent them.

She failed to protect classified information, the FBI stated the server had been compromised, this handling of this server was against the law, and had I done this when I had clearances and worked in SCIFs in the Navy I would have gone to prison. I watched folks get punished, sometimes even jail time, for simple mistakes when handling classified information, let alone a purposeful violation of the law (using a private server for government email itself was a violation, let alone putting classified info on it). What she did was a flat violation of the law and should have been prosecuted, if we are to pretend that there are not "two different justice systems" then she would have.

IMHO, we need to hold our representatives to even higher standards than we expect from the proles rather than constantly let them walk free because of who they marry or what job they happened to have held. It should be the "proles" that get the benefit of the doubt, not the "powerful" folks that we elect to represent us.
Click to expand...
Cisco server with a hardware firewall? Like I said, that's only 2nd to a hardened Linux server with a hardware firewall.
I guarantee the server this thing runs on isn't that secure. A hardware firewall is a separate computer to filter things.
Think of it as Cloudflare on steroids and set to the user's desires, but it's a smaller computer next to the one you're running.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top