The facts are not on Comey's side

They had to dig up a lawyer with zero prosecutorial experience to even take this case
What 'case'???
- the facts are ALL against the trump cult and for Comey.
What 'facts'???
Every legal expert says so.
You don't get to speak for everyone. You only get to speak for you. Omniscience fallacy.

When even FOX is against you, it's time to pack up your Nazi tent and take your clown show somewhere else, trumptard!
FOX is owned and operated by leftists, idiot.
 
He isn't cooked yet. The pot is still heating. I tend to agree with you to a point though. Comey is gonna get boiled.
We'll see how many they get. Our Justice system is kinda funky, for real.
They'll get whatever the law will allow that they are focused on with ample evidence.
That's just how it is. :dunno:
Classically, prosecutors, even Blondi, never take a case unless it's a slam dunk.
That usually how it works in The American Justice System.
Prosecutors rarely lose cases. It looks bad on them if they do.
With not enough evidence, they usually just do not pursue or try to get a plea bargain.
There are a lot of caveats in there, oh yes, and I am not a lawyer.
Soros-funded D.A.s refuse to prosecute criminal cases with ample evidence. That in itself is a RICO conspiracy. It is.
That may soon be addressed as well. Big kerfluffle in FL right now.
Dude was masturbating at children in a public park. Soros-funded black Judge let him go with no bail. :(
 
Last edited:
We'll see how many they get. Our Justice system is kinda funky, for real.
If by that you see judges and prosecutors break the law, I agree.
They'll get whatever the law will allow that they are focused on with ample evidence.
If and ONLY if they are legally convicted.
That's just how it is. :dunno:
Classically, prosecutors, even Blondi, never take a case unless it's a slam dunk.
Sure they do.
That usually how it works in The American Justice System.
Prosecutors rarely lose cases. It looks bad on them if they do.
I see prosecutors lose a lot. I've seen incompetent ones. Same with defense lawyers.
There is NOTHING holy about them in any way. They are people. Some make mistakes, some are just plain incompetent, some willingly break the law.

Our Attorney General here in Washington has been breaking the law and is now under federal investigation for it.


With not enough evidence, they usually just do not pursue.
Heh. I've been on juries where EXACTLY that has happened!
There are a lot of caveats in there, oh yes, and I am not a lawyer.
Neither am I. I don't have to be.

Lawyers have their place, but you have to get a good one (there's a lot of incompetence out there!). Lawyers are trained in the Rules of the Court in their jurisdiction, and are familiar with nuances of law that you might not be familiar with.

Sure, you can represent yourself, but you will be held to the same Rules of the Court and appropriate section of the law as a lawyer would be.

I HAVE represented myself on some cases (businesses get sued a LOT!)...mostly on stupid repetitive stuff I already know about from experience. For other stuff, I will use a lawyer.

Most of the time, when representing myself, all I have to do is submit the contract the moron sued over to the judge and it's all over. The case gets dismissed in my favor.
 
In a hearing on September 30, 2020, Senator Cruz asked Comey if he’d ever acted as or facilitated leaks from the FBI, he answered “no.” He was then asked if he would like to revise or amend his testimony to give him a second chance. He said he stood by it. For any normal person, this is a slam dunk

Remember, nobody is above the law. Not even former FBI directors whose family is littered throughout the justice department.

They only thing that would have made this better would be if they did a pre-dawn raid to haul him away in cuffs and perp walk his sorry ass
He's even admitted he lied on the record and in his book. This will be an easy case to prosecute and convict.
 
If by that you see judges and prosecutors break the law, I agree.

If and ONLY if they are legally convicted.

Sure they do.

I see prosecutors lose a lot. I've seen incompetent ones. Same with defense lawyers.
There is NOTHING holy about them in any way. They are people. Some make mistakes, some are just plain incompetent, some willingly break the law.

Our Attorney General here in Washington has been breaking the law and is now under federal investigation for it.



Heh. I've been on juries where EXACTLY that has happened!

Neither am I. I don't have to be.

Lawyers have their place, but you have to get a good one (there's a lot of incompetence out there!). Lawyers are trained in the Rules of the Court in their jurisdiction, and are familiar with nuances of law that you might not be familiar with.

Sure, you can represent yourself, but you will be held to the same Rules of the Court and appropriate section of the law as a lawyer would be.

I HAVE represented myself on some cases (businesses get sued a LOT!)...mostly on stupid repetitive stuff I already know about from experience. For other stuff, I will use a lawyer.

Most of the time, when representing myself, all I have to do is submit the contract the moron sued over to the judge and it's all over. The case gets dismissed in my favor.
I'm sorry, the prosecutors I've known have been more than competent.
All of them. Bondi is competent.
 
You I don’t even know what is occurring

FIFY

McCabe testified earlier that he believed Comey knew about a leak to the media and may have authorized it. Cruz asked Comey latter if he had authorized it, to which Comey denied. So how are you going to prove Comey lied to Congress?

With the evidence you brainless clown. :palm:

The 2018 IG report covers the same accusations and declared them void.

Link to this lie filled claim. :palm:

Even possibility Bondi will drop the case given its shallowness and fact Comey can also employ Trump’s documented pressure on the DOJ to charge him, given Donnie bad media coverage

You've never been right, so there is that much. :palm:
 
That won't work, Matt. You can't make the FBI records just disappear, and you can't just make shit up and get away with it.
You can't just say "There's no such thing as hardware firewalls" when I know for a fact there are. :dunno:
Hillary's system had one, it was set up by a pro, and it was a Cisco server. No that is not Linux.
The server that runs this thing is not as secure or powerful as Hillary's was.
She did use it illegally, but as far as being hackable? Notsomuch.
Like I said, somebody got a RAT or something on someone in 1/2 dozen emails from her email server, but that's as far as it went.
She violated Title 18 like you said, but as far as the security of a setup like that? Damn secure.
What the person that "hacked" would have access to is that 1/2 dozen emails involving the person he hacked, and that's it,
when there were many more users in that server. Huma Abedein, for instance.
If you understand that. :dunno:
 
Last edited:
I know that you are disappointed with every prediction you've ever made. Oh wait, morons like you don't know they are morons.

Honestly, and this is just a helpful thing - you should try debating, or offering some kind of argument.

You spend a ton of time on here, yet every post of yours is pretty much the same, and says essentially nothing - generally insulting whoever you're responding to without any substance or persuasive counterpoint.

And the insults are meaningless. I never flinch or anything. I doubt anyone does.
 
Honestly, and this is just a helpful thing - you should try debating, or offering some kind of argument.

You spend a ton of time on here, yet every post of yours is pretty much the same, and says essentially nothing - generally insulting whoever you're responding to without any substance or persuasive counterpoint.

And the insults are meaningless. I never flinch or anything. I doubt anyone does.
Inversion fallacy. Still waiting for an argument from you.
 
In 1946, Comey would end with a firing squad.

In post Obama America, he will never see a single day in prison.

There are consequences to allowing Radical Lefties to have power. Let's not do that again.

-
I doubt even a conviction would score jail for Comey.
 
You do
FBI records are not a link. There was no Cisco server (which runs Linux, BTW). There is no such thing as a 'hardware firewall'. Firewalls do not deny anyone. That is not their function. Making up numbers and using them as 'data' is a fallacy.

You do have this habit of pontificating about something and being completely wrong!

 
Back
Top