Noking
Fight authoritarianism support Noking
Funny, but is is true????????????That's pretty funny.
Funny, but is is true????????????That's pretty funny.
Someone doesn't get the joke.So the Black dog![]()
Its alleged.Funny, but is is true????????????
I'm saying there is inadequate election security . If a dog can vote so can anyone else. What is next voting iguanas?Wait a minute, close to 27 million people vote in California, over 8 million by mail, and you are generalizing from this one narrative that the whole system is corrupted?
Yeah I figured it would go over your head.Someone doesn't get the joke.
Nope. Obama is half black half white.Yeah I figured it would go over your head.
WOOF! CA Woman Illegally Registers Dog, Casts Mail-In Ballots — Now Faces Felonies
A 62-year-old California woman was charged Friday with five felonies for illegally registering her dog to vote and casting ballots in her dog’s name in the 2021 state gubernatorial recall election and the 2022 primary election, according to the Orange County District Attorney’s office.
California’s elections were significantly changed in 2021 after Democrat California Gov. Gavin Newsom signed Assembly Bill 37, making universal mail-in voting permanent and requiring counties to automatically mail ballots to all active, registered voters. According to a press release from the Orange County’s DA office, 62-year-old Laura Lee Yourex of Costa Mesa has been charged with one felony count of perjury, one felony count of procuring or offering a false or forged document to be filed, two felony counts of casting a ballot when not entitled to vote, and one felony count of registering a non-existent person to vote.
In October 2024, the DA’s office was contacted by the Orange County Registrar of Voters’ Office after a resident allegedly self-reported that she registered her dog to vote. The resident claimed that she cast a mail-in ballot addressed to her dog, Maya, for the 2021 gubernatorial recall election and the 2022 primary election.
“The dog’s vote was successfully counted in the 2021 gubernatorial recall election but was rejected in the 2022 primary,” the press release states...
....According to the press release, Yourex allegedly posted on her social media a picture of her dog in January 2022 “wearing an ‘I voted’ sticker and posing with her ballot.” An additional photo was allegedly posted on Yourex’s social media in October 2024, showing her dog’s tag and a vote-by-mail ballot with the caption, “maya is still getting her ballot,” despite the dog having previously passed away.
==============================================...
Tell me again how mass mail voting is secure. Mailing voting will not stop illegal aliens from voting.
mediabiasfactcheck.com
It is a problem when cheating is so easy even a Beagle can do it.You don’t either, so it isn’t a problem until there is evidence there is a problem.
He using a fake news site, and also notice that this article doesn't use a name of the 62 year old who committed this crime.Its alleged.
You’re confused.If voter-fraud were so small as to not matter, why do the Democrats work so damn hard to enable and protect fraud-voting?
The answer is, it is not small, in blue-states, it is huge, and usually determines the elections.
-
More like delusional and hallucinating.You’re confused.
So if they covered their tracks well how would we know.I'll give you an example of how they could sway the election in swing states where relatively few votes are needed. After an election worker separates a mail in vote from the envelope there are ZERO ways to identify who cast the vote. So one or two election workers that wanted to cheat could sway the election in their state and as soon as the envelope from the ballot and there is no way to detect the fraud.
ProjectionYou are hated by most people.
-
Sure but what you are saying is stupid.I'm saying there is inadequate election security . If a dog can vote so can anyone else. What is next voting iguanas?
Hey Retard there are multiple other sources for the same story.You are using a fake news site for your reference.
The Maine Wire
Overall, we rate The Maine Wire as Right-biased based on its consistent editorial stance and advocacy for a policy that aligns with conservative perspectives. We also rate it Mixed for factual accuracy and questionable due to the promotion of propaganda, conspiracy theories, pseudoscience, and failed fact checks.
Questionable Reasoning: Propaganda, Conspiracy, Poor Sourcing, Pseudoscience, Failed Fact Checks
Bias Rating: RIGHT
Factual Reporting: MIXED
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY
![]()
The Maine Wire - Bias and Credibility
QUESTIONABLE SOURCE A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or nomediabiasfactcheck.com
www.forbes.com