Jim Jordan's whiustleblowers are disgraced traitors.

If that's true, then why all the effort to keep them from testifying at all?

Because the republiclowns and right wing media are all playing the game we all know, so why play it with them?


- Call people whistleblowers who are not
- present their fake and distorted testimony as if fact
- deny as much access to verifying them as possible
- run stories of 'shock', 'dismay' and 'disgust' at the "terrible made up things and lies" the fake whistleblower says
- and when the truth eventually all gets out do not report it

The problem Jordan has is there is history on these fake whistleblowers already and as such they come off no better than Rudy Giulliani's whistleblower. They need to all take a page of Jim Comer who seemed to learn the best lesson is to claim '10 credible whistleblowers' and then just say 'I can't find them after'.

201203200118-melissa-carone-rudy-giuliani-witness-michigan-ebof-vpx-00000000-super-169.jpg
 
Because the republiclowns and right wing media are all playing the game we all know, so why play it with them?


- Call people whistleblowers who are not
- present their fake and distorted testimony as if fact
- deny as much access to verifying them as possible
- run stories of 'shock', 'dismay' and 'disgust' at the "terrible made up things and lies" the fake whistleblower says
- and when the truth eventually all gets out do not report it

The problem Jordan has is there is history on these fake whistleblowers already and as such they come off no better than Rudy Giulliani's whistleblower. They need to all take a page of Jim Comer who seemed to learn the best lesson is to claim '10 credible whistleblowers' and then just say 'I can't find them after'.

201203200118-melissa-carone-rudy-giuliani-witness-michigan-ebof-vpx-00000000-super-169.jpg

All of that's just a dodge of my question. If these whistleblowers are so non-credible, and those questioning them so incompetent, what's the problem with them testifying? You only try to stop someone from testifying or someone from questioning the witness when you think they're going to wreck your case.

It's like the old saw...

When the law is on your side, argue the law

When the facts are on your side, argue the facts.

When you have neither, bang your shoe on the table and declare the proceedings to be a sham.
 
The only "whistleblower" Republicans could find was a drunk prostitute willing to say anything.

I miss Melissa. She was awesome. The epitome of being a Trumper woman. :thup:

I like her at the 2:00+ mark best. LOL

 
The FBI doesn't classify documents. That's solely something related to defense and the military. The DOJ's only document classifications are related to the FOIA where certain information is not allowed to become public like social security numbers, and one used internally for sensitive information that shouldn't be released to the public. Neither sort holds the same sort of penalties that releasing classified information does. Instead, misuse is handled internally as an employee discipline problem. Also, releasing such information to Congress where it isn't made public doesn't violate that policy.

Your defense of traitors figures since you've renounced your oath after retirement, Terry.
 
Still wondering what you have to do with American politics
He's a wannabe American....a wannabe American who is correct that BidenPresident has a strongly feminine personality. Add that she's likely to be under age 35, if not 30.
 
so you morons on the left can't define a whistleblower, or spell it :laugh:

Are you saying these jokers where actual whistle blowers? I mean, if you watch any of the hearing you see it's brought out that only their lawyers are calling them whistleblowers.

An employee who alleges wrongdoing by their employer of the sort that violates public law or tends to injure a considerable number of people. The employer can be public or private. Whistleblowers often relay information to law enforcement and other government agencies.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/whistleblower

It was revealed that these jokers were terminated because of their biased actions regarding investigations into the Jan. 6th rioters/insurrectionists, of which they were supportive in their actions.

THAT and taking money from a Trump affiliate sealed their fate with the agency. And Jim "motor mouth" Jordan's hearings are exposed (once again) as a partisan farce and waste of the taxpayer's money.
 
Sounds more to me like their supervisors at the FBI are conducting a CYA operation and punishing anyone who might make them look bad...

After all, the only time this came up was when they were going to testify. Then suddenly they were somehow involved with Jan 6, lost their security clearances, etc. That sure looks like retaliation to me.

Are you saying these jokers where actual whistle blowers? I mean, if you watch any of the hearing you see it's brought out that only their lawyers are calling them whistleblowers.

An employee who alleges wrongdoing by their employer of the sort that violates public law or tends to injure a considerable number of people. The employer can be public or private. Whistleblowers often relay information to law enforcement and other government agencies. https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/whistleblower

It was revealed that these jokers were terminated because of their biased actions regarding investigations into the Jan. 6th rioters/insurrectionists, of which they were supportive in their actions.

THAT and taking money from a Trump affiliate sealed their fate with the agency. And Jim "motor mouth" Jordan's hearings are exposed (once again) as a partisan farce and waste of the taxpayer's money.
 
It went very well for them... And I'm happy to hear they got donations for their family...Very well deserved...

You mean as MAGA lackey's betraying their oath of office? Yeah, they got PAID to "blow the whistle", which blew up in their faces in another of Motor Mouth Jordan's disgraceful hearings.
 
Back
Top