Trump guilty of sexual abuse

The year of the crime was in the 1990’s. The statute of limitations does not apply to the time when you report the crime, it’s determined by when the time the crime was committed.

The crime was not investigated by the authorities because it was committed in the 90’s and Ms. Carroll made the decision at the time not to report it, but in 2019 she decided to come forward with her accusations to expose Trump.

The newly passed law in New York allowed her to file a lawsuit against Trump and that is what she did.

She has evidence, it’s been tested, it’s male DNA and Trump refused to give his DNA sample.

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/timeline-main-events-e-jean-135213759.html

"The 1990's" is not a year.
 
The year of the crime was in the 1990’s. The statute of limitations does not apply to the time when you report the crime, it’s determined by when the time the crime was committed.

The crime was not investigated by the authorities because it was committed in the 90’s and Ms. Carroll made the decision at the time not to lreport it, but in 2019 she decided to come forward with her accusations to expose Trump.

The newly passed law in New York allowed her to file a lawsuit against Trump and that is what she did.

She has evidence, it’s been tested, it’s male DNA and Trump refused to give his DNA sample.

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/timeline-main-events-e-jean-135213759.html

No, the statute of limitations start when investigators hear about the crime, not when the crime occurred.

Look the shit up

It as looked into but there was zero evidence of it ever happening so the investigation was quickly ended

The statute of limitations was created to protect people from undo investigation.

The authorities are given a certain amount of time to gather evidence and build their case but they are not allowed to harass someone indefinitely
 
Last edited:
When did it supposedly happen? Just give us the year. Where was trump on the day she can't remember when it supposedly happened?

So what... That does not mean it didn't happen. Trump should offer his DNA and clear this up.

Or he could have testified and maybe the jury would have had something to go on and deny the claim.
 
So what... That does not mean it didn't happen. Trump should offer his DNA and clear this up.

Or he could have testified and maybe the jury would have had something to go on and deny the claim.

I could claim Biden raped me 30 years ago also, doesn’t mean it didn’t happen.

What good would dna do, this gold digger never had a rape kit done, there is nothing to compare Trumps dna to
 
No, the statute of limitations start when investigators hear about the crime, not when the crime occurred.

Look the shit up

It as looked into but there was zero evidence of it ever happening so the investigation was quickly ended

The statute of limitations was created to protect people from undo investigation.

The authorities are given a certain amount of time to gather evidence and build their case but they are not allowed to harass someone indefinitely
“A statute of limitations is a law that sets the maximum amount of time that parties involved in a dispute have to initiate legal proceedings from the date of an alleged offense, whether civil or criminal. The length of time the statute allows for a victim to bring legal action against the suspected wrong-doer can vary based on the jurisdiction and the nature of the offense.
 
Former President Donald Trump has been found guilty of sexually abusing advice columnist E. Jean Carroll. A New York jury delivered the verdict today (May 9) and awarded the plaintiff $5 million.

According to The Associated Press, the jury reached its decision on the first day of its deliberations. Jurors didn’t accept Carroll’s claims that she was raped by the onetime “Apprentice” host, but still found him liable for sexual abuse and for defaming her after she went public with her allegations in 2019.

Trump, who vehemently denied the claims over the years, didn’t appear in the civil trial and wasn’t present when the verdict was read. Carroll, meanwhile, tearfully nodded while it was read aloud. The result was validation for Carroll, who is one of more than a dozen women who accused Trump of sexual assault or harassment.

Trump is the epitome of abuse. He abuses everything within his reach. But most of all, HE ABUSED HIS OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENCY TO FEATHER HIS OWN NEST AND CORRUPT OUR GOVERNMENT AND OUR DEMOCRATIC PROCESSES to benefit himself personally and financially!

He abused his executive power to protect himself from being held accountable for all of his crimes he committed while in office- ALSO THE ONES HE COMMITTED BEFORE HE WAS IN OFFICE, AND THE ONES HE HAS COMMITTED EVER SINCE LOSING THE ELECTION.

And he has abused his executive power to PARDON his conspirators that helped him carry out his crimes.
 
Last edited:
What a joke.

Not any evidence to file criminal charges but some liberal jury found him guilty anyways.

Really? And how much legal experience do you have, MAGA moron?

funny_redneck_crazy_face_animated_gif_by_bensib-d4is1um.gif
 
Trump is the epitome of abuse. He abuses everything within his reach. But most of all, HE ABUSED HIS OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENCY TO FEATHER HIS OWN NEST AND CORRUPT OUR GOVERNMENT AND OUR DEMOCRATIC PROCESSES to benefit himself.

Unlike the Bidens right?

You do realize that Trump took no paycheck unlike Biden.
 
Unlike the Bidens right?

You do realize that Trump took no paycheck unlike Biden.

PAYCHECK?

Trump made millions upon millions of dollars from his Washington Hotel while in office.

His tax bill alone made him Millions of dollars a year- Well that is if he would have actually paid his taxes which clearly he did not!

And not only that the TAX PAYERS spent over 500 million dollars alone, flying his FAT CROOKED ASS back and forth from MARY-A-LARDO and the WHITE HOUSE every weekend for the 4 years he was shitting in, and on the WHITE HOUSE!

PAYCHECK my ass!

PLEASE Stay the fuck away from me with that kind of mentality OK?

Thanks!
.
 
Last edited:
Former President Donald Trump has been found guilty of sexually abusing advice columnist E. Jean Carroll. A New York jury delivered the verdict today (May 9) and awarded the plaintiff $5 million.

According to The Associated Press, the jury reached its decision on the first day of its deliberations. Jurors didn’t accept Carroll’s claims that she was raped by the onetime “Apprentice” host, but still found him liable for sexual abuse and for defaming her after she went public with her allegations in 2019.

Trump, who vehemently denied the claims over the years, didn’t appear in the civil trial and wasn’t present when the verdict was read. Carroll, meanwhile, tearfully nodded while it was read aloud. The result was validation for Carroll, who is one of more than a dozen women who accused Trump of sexual assault or harassment.

Here is the ultimate conundrum for Joey wet panties,

Trump buys a Tesla.
 
There is a seven year statute of limitations for rape which starts once investigators hear of a crime, the time of the rape is irrelevant.

Caroll reported the rape in 2019 meaning the statute of limitations was nowhere close to over yet investigators could find no evidence of a sexual assault

She made all this up and got lucky by getting a liberal jury

OMG. You seem to want to prove you are an idiot.

https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/CPL/30.10

There are 3 levels of rape. Each has a different statute of limitations. None of them have a 7 year statute of limitations from the time the rape is reported.
Rape 1 - no statute of limitations.
Rape 2 - The earlier of 10 years from reported or within 20 years from commission
Rape 3 - within 10 years of commission

Those are the current statute of limitations. A rape that occurred in 1996 would be subject to 1996 laws.

Rape is different from sexual assault. Rape requires sexual intercourse in NY. The jury found that Trump committed sexual abuse which is sexually assaulting someone. The statute of limitations for sexual abuse would appear to be 5 years from the date of commission.

There is no such thing as a liberal jury. All juries are duty bound to be impartial and follow the law. Unless you have evidence the jury didn't follow the law, your argument is bullshit.
 
OMG. You seem to want to prove you are an idiot.

https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/CPL/30.10

There are 3 levels of rape. Each has a different statute of limitations. None of them have a 7 year statute of limitations from the time the rape is reported.
Rape 1 - no statute of limitations.
Rape 2 - The earlier of 10 years from reported or within 20 years from commission
Rape 3 - within 10 years of commission

Those are the current statute of limitations. A rape that occurred in 1996 would be subject to 1996 laws.

Rape is different from sexual assault. Rape requires sexual intercourse in NY. The jury found that Trump committed sexual abuse which is sexually assaulting someone. The statute of limitations for sexual abuse would appear to be 5 years from the date of commission.

There is no such thing as a liberal jury. All juries are duty bound to be impartial and follow the law. Unless you have evidence the jury didn't follow the law, your argument is bullshit.
Thank you
 
OMG. You seem to want to prove you are an idiot.

https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/CPL/30.10

There are 3 levels of rape. Each has a different statute of limitations. None of them have a 7 year statute of limitations from the time the rape is reported.
Rape 1 - no statute of limitations.
Rape 2 - The earlier of 10 years from reported or within 20 years from commission
Rape 3 - within 10 years of commission

Those are the current statute of limitations. A rape that occurred in 1996 would be subject to 1996 laws.

Rape is different from sexual assault. Rape requires sexual intercourse in NY. The jury found that Trump committed sexual abuse which is sexually assaulting someone. The statute of limitations for sexual abuse would appear to be 5 years from the date of commission.

There is no such thing as a liberal jury. All juries are duty bound to be impartial and follow the law. Unless you have evidence the jury didn't follow the law, your argument is bullshit.

Thank You
 
I could claim Biden raped me 30 years ago also, doesn’t mean it didn’t happen.

What good would dna do, this gold digger never had a rape kit done, there is nothing to compare Trumps dna to

She has a dress she said she wore that day and they were able to scrape DNA off of it. She says its his.

You can claim what ever you want, if you go to court and offer sworn testimony under penalty of perjury...
 
I could claim Biden raped me 30 years ago also, doesn’t mean it didn’t happen.

What good would dna do, this gold digger never had a rape kit done, there is nothing to compare Trumps dna to
You could claim whatever you want, but are you willing to claim it under oath?

The DNA was on a wool jacket she was wearing at the time of the assault. Trump refused to supply his DNA so it could be compared to the sample which was tested and found to be “unknown male DNA”.

Trump could have clear himself by giving his DNA, but he refused to do so.

A jury of six men and three women found Trump liable of sexual assault without Trump’s DNA.
 
She has a dress she said she wore that day and they were able to scrape DNA off of it. She says its his.

You can claim what ever you want, if you go to court and offer sworn testimony under penalty of perjury...

Trump refused repeatedly to provide DNA. He did that because he is innocent, I guess.
 
Back
Top