Should Government tell parents...

TOP said:
I've posted many links and I'm sure that you're not sure what I'm talking about because you're not paying attention...
Click to expand...

I’ve gone back and looked at everything you’ve posted, no source documenting any marketing toward children.

And you can’t prove me wrong, I dare you to post any wording from anything you’ve linked documenting any marketing toward children.
 
Jarod said:
Depends on what is marked “family friendly”.
Click to expand...
the show in question A Drag Queen Christmas was advertised as family friendly... and eventually they added the under 18 had to be accompanied by a parent...
.. I thought you've been reading about this?
I guess not?
 
Geeko Sportivo said:
And where was this even at? All I saw was a bunch of women and one little girl at what looks like a birthday party at a nightclub or restaurant and someone called in a party stripper. FAKE NEWS DUDE! This is not public school idiot.

I would not bring my children to an event like that.

And apparently only one parent chose to bring their child- Probably ended up regretting it.

But this is not in a classroom environment and has nothing to do with Public school curriculum!
Click to expand...

Translation: I see nutting! Take a hike dipshit. You're too dishonest to take serious at any level. :palm:
 
Jarod said:
HOw is your red tsunami?
Click to expand...

It wasn't. The voters were duped by a dishonest media and President which convinced low IQ Democrat voters that their democracy was at risk and abortions were much more important than their pocket books.

More evidence of how badly our educational system is failing us, you being a prime example. :palm:
 
Jarod said:
For political gain, to rile up uninformed prejudice voters. Ans he is using huge amounts of taxpayer money to do it.

Are you are so stupid you do not see that?
Click to expand...

The only one's getting riled up about preventing children from witnessing porn in action are uneducated and dishonest leftist morons on the left like you dipstick.
 
NiftyNiblick said:
The government has the right to protect children from parental abuse, neglect, or even incompetence, but not to dictate taste in entertainment.
Click to expand...

This isn't about "taste in entertainment" you dishonest dickhead. It's about exposing children to porn. The trans community is all about sex. Dumbass.
 
Earl said:
Because of the explicit language of the Second.
Click to expand...

There is no explicit language. It has been fought in the Supreme Court several times. Warren Buger, chief justice said
The gun lobbyist's interpretation of the 2nd amendment is one of the greatest pieces of fraud, I repeat the word fraud, in my lifetime. on the American people by special interest groups, that I have ever seen in my lifetime.
The real purpose of the 2nd amendment was to insure that state armies, the militia, would be maintained for the defense of the state. The very language of the 2nd amendment refutes any argument thati it was intended to guarantee every citizen an unfettered right to ny kind of weapon he or she desires.
It is not simple. you are.
 
Jarod said:
If the public wants to buy a ticket and go, I have no problem with it... if parents want to take their kids, that is the parents choice. The government should not regulate or decide what is art.

You are more concerned about a 12 year old seeing a guy in a dress than having an AR.
Click to expand...

If the public wants to go then that's their choice. But not in a municipal venue.
The government already decides what is art by aligning with community standards.
 
Celticguy said:
If the public wants to go then that's their choice. But not in a municipal venue.
The government already decides what is art by aligning with community standards.
Click to expand...

Ruth Eckerd Hall is a private venue, the Governor wants to shut it down.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top