Should Government tell parents...

So X-Rated and NC-17 is not dictating taste in entertainment?


Can u take your 6 year old to s strip joint for entertainment?

Ratings are one thing, and permitted access is another.

I would have had no problem with my six year old seeing strippers in that as a six year old, he saw plenty of nudity on cable TV.
We didn't censor our kids' televiewing.
The seedy joint is the issue, not the strippers.
 
You were talking about the language of the Amendment itself. The First Amendment should not have different regulations than the Second, if we can regulate the first, we can regulate the second. Right?

We're talking about young children, you silly olf. WTF is the matter with you?
 
Ratings are one thing, and permitted access is another.

I would have had no problem with my six year old seeing strippers in that as a six year old, he saw plenty of nudity on cable TV.
We didn't censor our kids' televiewing.
The seedy joint is the issue, not the strippers.

Strippers is what makes it seedy!


Gambling is a form of entertainment...should 12 year old's be running around Casinos with their allowance

So u just fine with a 7 year old watching Deep Throat Jailbaits and Slaughterhouse type movies ...Wow u a great parent


And we wonder whats wrong with kids that shoot up a school
 
Yes, it said the Governor was threatening Ruth Eckerd Hall with loss of its liquor License.

Which show are you talking about ? The last one I linked to is a performance that is today ...it was not marketed for children nor does it say anything about being able to bring them to the show... the Christmas show in question did very possibly violate rules that would cause an establishment to lose its liquor license ...I'm sure you understand that..
 
Which show are you talking about ? The last one I linked to is a performance that is today ...it was not marketed for children nor does it say anything about being able to bring them to the show... the Christmas show in question did very possibly violate rules that would cause an establishment to lose its liquor license ...I'm sure you understand that..

Read your article...
 
What a sorry state of affairs it is that parents have to be forced to prevent them from abusing their children.
 
Which show are you talking about ? The last one I linked to is a performance that is today ...it was not marketed for children nor does it say anything about being able to bring them to the show... the Christmas show in question did very possibly violate rules that would cause an establishment to lose its liquor license ...I'm sure you understand that..

None of these marketed to children you silly dunce.
 
Because of the explicit language of the Second.

Please post the entire Second Amendment, because it is less explicit than the first.

To a Trumpper, rights they like are told to like are ABSOLUTE, rights they hate are subject to limitation.
 
What a sorry state of affairs it is that parents have to be forced to prevent them from abusing their children.

The fucking morons seeking to empower government to force parents on how to raise their children are opening the door to a majority of citizens considering parents who teach their kids how to shoot and hunt to be "abusing their children".
 
Back
Top