Two weeks, still no explanation…

you didn't list ANY evidence....,..you made allegations......



It would seem to be that NARA, the DoJ, the FBI, Trump, Trump's lawyers all agree that Trump took items that should have been turned over to NARA when he left office. That is hardly an allegation on my part that is something that everyone involved seems to agree on.
 
I don't recall anything on your list that was evidence......I saw allegations.......which item on your list do you have evidence of?......
 
it is clear they agree.....but they are the ones who now have to prove it........good luck....

So you are calling Trump and his lawyers liars?
"The National Archives did not 'find' anything, they were given, upon request, Presidential Records in an ordinary and routine process to ensure the preservation of my legacy and in accordance with the Presidential Records Act."

Trump's statement clearly shows he had documents that were returned.

The letter by signed Trump's lawyer Corcoran clearly shows that some of the documents were marked classified since Corcoran tries to insulate Trump from being charged for having classified documents.
It is important to note a few bedrock principles:
( 1 ) A PresidentHas AbsoluteAuthorityTo DeclassifyDocuments.
Under the U.S. Constitution , the President is vested with the highest level of authority when it
comes to the classification and declassification of documents .
...
( 2 ) PresidentialActions Involving Classified Documents Are Not Subject To Criminal
Sanction.
 
and I've seen no proof there were top secret documents........I guess you should shut the fuck up until some evidence pops up.....

Even if they showed video taken inside of Trump's residence, of documents stamped TOP SECRET you'd still find some way to deny it.

Just like the video footage of J6.

You slack-jawed goobers still deny what it was.

Fuck your proof requirements.

Nobody needs to prove shit to you hillbilly cultists.

Nobody gives a shit about you.
 
Do you understand that sworn testimony is evidence?

We understand what evidence is. Evidence is, like you said, sworn testimony corroborated by others and/or physical evidence.

MAGA cult's definition of evidence is the last rant Tucker did.
 
I honestly believe the reason he stole those documents could well be simply that it makes him feel important to have them.

But in order to "feel important" others need to know you have them. The only way for them to know is if you show them, and then, UH OH, that's an additional crime, a really bad espionage one!
 
Hello Lurch,



It is too fishy to let it go.

He's not supposed to do that.

And he wrote on some of the pages.

He's not supposed to do that either.

He is not above the law, but I don't think he understands that.

It is time for him to answer to some of his crimes.

Oh, of course he doesn't understand that. He had 4 years of his co-conspirators running cover for him, commiting crimes and then he pardoned them.

What he doesn't understand is he is without the protection of the presidency any longer. He's an ex-president without security clearance. He's just like you and me. And just like you and me he'd better fucking pay for it like we'd have to!
 
cart before horse.....first we will need to know what documents are at issue.....as usual, you children are running ahead of yourselves.......shucks you idiots had him convicted three years ago already......yet you still haven't picked the crime......

We have the inventory. We know what he took. 184 sensitive documents, several of them marked "top secret".

He can't see those and he can't "declassify" them. And no, you're not going to get the tittle of the documents dipshit or what they contained. They're TOP SECRET you fool.
 
Trump had in his possession documents that were supposed to be turned over by law to the National Archives by Jan 22, 2021

The National Archives requested the return of the documents.
Trump or people working for Trump didn't promptly return the documents.
Almost 1 year after Trump was supposed to have returned those documents he returned some of them.
When cataloguing the documents NARA discovered that some of the documents were marked as classified.
NARA also believed there were other documents that hadn't been returned and Trump was refusing to return them.
A Grand jury was empaneled and issued a subpoena for any documents marked classified in Trump's possession.
When the subpoena was served, some documents were returned and a lawyer signed a document claiming all classified documents were returned.
The DoJ and FBI was shown the unlocked storage closet where the documents were being stored.
The DoJ sent a letter saying the documents were not properly stored so Trump's lawyers had a second lock put on the door.
The DoJ subpoenaed security video taken outside the storage closet. The video may have shown people moving things in and out of storage.
DoJ takes it's evidence to a court and gets a search warrant. The search warrant lists 3 statutes that were likely violated. None of the statutes require the documents be classified for there to be a crime.

18 U.S.C. § 793 (e)
18 U.S.C. § 1519
18 U.S.C. 2071
FBI executes the search warrant and lists classified documents among the items it takes from Mar-a-Lago


After the above events:

PMP tries to pretend none of the above happened by pretending that all the documents were declassified so there is no evidence of any classified documents at Mar-a-Lago.

He's going to want to see the titles of each document and what was in them. He doesn't believe the National Archives, DOJ or FBI. He also doesn't understand he can't have that information - it's SECRET.

PMP's not going to budge. But Hillary's server.. "lock her up".

Yeah.
 
PiMP is under the delusion that trump did nothing wrong and he will wake up and trump will still be president

He's not going to get his wish. The prosecution's case is done/in the bag. Once trump's convicted PmP's next step will be "the prosecution was corrupt". It's so obvious.
 
So you are calling Trump, his attorneys, Kash Patel, John Solomon, the DoJ, the FBI and major media including Fox News all liars?

What specifically in that list do you think is only "alleged?"

The majority of that list has already been presented to a court and accepted as factual.

The case is closed. Like I just said, PmP's next argument is to claim "prosecutorial misconduct". I can see his posts now :)
 
absolutely not.....I think its their job to tell us what evidence there is that Trump committed a crime you fucking lame excuse for a for a person with a logical argument......

And when the prosecution proves its case and trump is convicted you're going to claim "prosecutorial misconduct", you fuckwit.

You're still and adorable little troll, Kitten :)
 
Even if they showed video taken inside of Trump's residence, of documents stamped TOP SECRET you'd still find some way to deny it.

Just like the video footage of J6.

You slack-jawed goobers still deny what it was.

Fuck your proof requirements.

Nobody needs to prove shit to you hillbilly cultists.

Nobody gives a shit about you.

And that's a wrap! Thread closed! Thank you!!!! :)
 
Back
Top