Wasn't the Secret Service guy supposed to refute Hutchinson?

Yes. Which is what happens when an administration transitions. They bring in their own support staff. Are you from a different planet?

And she thought she was moving to Florida. But then she wasn't. It pissed her off. Yes, I am from the planet CoRoT-7b. I can rock you.
 
And she thought she was moving to Florida. But then she wasn't. It pissed her off. Yes, I am from the planet CoRoT-7b. I can rock you.

You must have a great tan too!

https://www.britannica.com/place/CoRoT-7b
. CoRoT-7b orbits its star every 0.85 day at a distance of 2.6 million km (1.6 million miles). It is so close to its star that its surface temperature is about 2,000 °C (3,600 °F). CoRoT-7b’s radius was determined to be 10,700 km (6,600 miles)—only 1.68 times that of Earth, and its mass was initially found to be at most 21 times that of Earth.
 
Yep, when Cipollini shut down the military seizing the voting machines that was twump's next play. Turn an angry mob on the Capitol.

Wasn't the angry mob already in the works once Trump sent the Tweet on 19DEC20?

https://www.npr.org/2022/07/13/1111...ld-tweet-drew-rioters-to-the-capitol-on-jan-6
How Trump's 'will be wild!' tweet drew rioters to the Capitol on Jan. 6
At 1:42 a.m. on Dec. 19, 2020 - shortly after a six-hour Oval Office meeting described by a White House aide as "unhinged" - Donald Trump sent a tweet "that would galvanize his followers, unleash a political firestorm, and change the course of our history as a country," in the words of Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md.

"Statistically impossible to have lost the 2020 Election," Trump tweeted, even after he had heard from many of his top political and legal advisers that he had, in fact, lost.

"Big protest in D.C. on January 6th," he wrote, referring to the day Congress was set to formally certify Joe Biden's victory in the electoral college.

"Be there, will be wild!"

ErWNHAYW4AcEezf
 
why are you stupid enough to believe he did?.....

Because it's been corroborated, Ornato and Engel have already testified to 1/6, you stupid fucking moron.

Speaking of 1/6, you are another poseur who spread the lie that the 2020 election was stolen, and like all the other poseurs on JPP, your punk ass hid out here on JPP on 1/6 and shitposted all day.

Why didn't you go to DC? Because you didn't want to go to jail for the stupidest lie ever told.
 
Nope, sorry. Really don't care. What I care about is the state of my country, ultimately meaningless political debate as a hobby, and Coffee Mate Peppermint Mocha coffee creamer, which I can't get right now due to president tater head's supply chain fuck ups.

Biden is the one who called COVID a hoax, leading to a global pandemic? Oh no, wait...that was you and Trump.
 
I'm not trying to drag hutchinson through the mud, especially based on a meaningless tweet.

Now you're not, but you were before.

Do you think we won't remember?


Get help with the big words, and just completely delete the "a source close to the Secret Service" part.

But that's the most important part because it says that it's not the SS who is saying this, it's someone else.

Aren't you the least bit curious to find out who is this someone else is, or if they are even real? Because that would mean that someone is stringing along the reporter, who is stringing you along.

Do you find yourself being strung along quite often? I bet you do because you don't strike me as someone with critical thinking skills.


Where is Into the Night? This has got to be some kind of logic fallacy.

Well hold up...if "a source close to the SS" is enough for you to conclude that Hutchinson is lying, then "a source close to JPP" is enough for me to conclude that you are a welfare queen.
 
You will NEVER get it, so I'll just tell you. Disregarding the "source" part, the tweet gives you the name of the head of the security detail

The source is the most important part of the tweet because that forms the basis of its credibility.

The source probably isn't even real, which is why Peter Alexander never followed up that tweet and will probably delete it later.


and mentions the limo/SUV DRIVER, who was definitely in the car with Trump, and was supposedly the "victim" of Trump's "attack".

Again, you're basing all of this on "a source close to the Secret Service", but you don't know who that source is, or if they are even real.
 
The source is the most important part of the tweet because that forms the basis of its credibility.






Again, you're basing all of this on "a source close to the Secret Service", but you don't know who that source is, or if they are even real.

this is the argument against hutchinson too.

see how truth manifests by being manifestly true?
 
Back
Top