Yes. Yes it must.
Thanks for finally telling the truth.
now jesus loves you again.
![]()

Yes. Yes it must.
Thanks for finally telling the truth.
now jesus loves you again.
![]()

Those who believe the election was stolen, and all the baggage that goes with it, fall into two groups: the mentally ill, which is, by far, the largest group and the WSEs, the smaller and far more deadly group.
It wasn't Trump and the Q anon phenomenon that was the great evil of 1/6. They were just a mob with the same collective low IQ of any mob. The great evil of Donald J. Trump is his willingness to get in bed with the WSEs, especially the ones with a deadly intention of violently taking down the US government by any means possible.
Many of them are mentally ill too but in a way far different from the wackadoodles among the Qless. Unlike them, the WSEs are not Trumpers. They are using Trump just like Trump is using them. Trump's mistake is that he thinks he can control his own Praetorian Guard.
It's interesting to note that one of the strike team Oath Keepers who attacked the Capitol on 1/6 was Jessica Watkins, a trans woman. Like the oddity that militias weren't ever mentioned during the Rittenhouse trial, there is very little mention of the fact Watkins is genetically male. WSE proponents make a big deal about how they can't be racist because they have Henry "Enrique" Tarrio, but they don't claim they are "woke" or otherwise enlightened about the rights of all Americans regardless of sexual preferences or attire.
One thought is that she was a "true believer", a die-hard who'd rather do the 20 years than give up a fellow soldier so they let her in based on that alone.
https://www.advocate.com/crime/2022...january-6-insurrection-oathkeepers-trail-case
![]()

Hanlon's Razor applies to all of government.
What reason does she have? Because a source close to JPP says that you are on welfare.
that their testimony corroborates Hutchinson's which is why she testified publicly.
On the Right malice is inbred but stupidity helps it along.
You know that's bigotry, right? Conservatives tend to be older and/or more religious Americans. The truism akin to "A conservative is a liberal who has been mugged".
The Founders seemed wise enough to realize that all points of view must be considered in a democracy. Regardless if it's a direct democracy or a republic, the Founders recognized that the power of the nation belonged to We, the People. Not the King, not the President and not any particular political party.
The problem, it seems, is what happens when "We, the People" don't want the responsibility and prefer to slough it off on any fucking moron willing to do it. People like Bill Clinton and Ted Cruz.
Only about 60% of all voter eligible Americans actually vote in Presidential elections, much less in midterms. This poll puts the US near the bottom of voter turnout by nation: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-ta...ed-most-developed-countries-in-voter-turnout/
So what's the real problem? Dirty perverted hateful lower humans in a particular demographic? A nation that has lost its way? Not enough people really give a shit?
Which direction would the nation go if it went your way? IMO, it seems division and wedge issues aren't getting us anywhere.
< YODA UNITY NEED SOME MEME DELETED >
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/direction_of_country-902.html
Right Direction 18.0
Wrong Track 75.1
Thing is that Nazis, fascists, white supremacists, bigots, homophobes and racists have ALWAYS been a part of the Conservative movement.
They've been there this whole time.
So Donald Trump didn't change anything, these people have always been like this. The reason they oppose "CRT" in schools is because they don't want to have to explain to their kids what grandma is doing in this photo:
https://www.history.com/.image/t_share/MTU3ODc4Njc2Nzk4MDU2MTU5/gettyimages-517322800-2.jpg
A direct democracy is a republic or would be if such a nation state existed. The alternative, such as The United States, is representative democracy though we continue to have direct democracy in some small towns were town hall meetings have local governmental authority to some degree.
I agree the comment you quoted was snide, also backwards. Would have been more apt the other way around. On the other hand, comparison of traditional conservatives with Trump supporters is a different proposition.
LV426;5201567]OK, two things:
1. You care quite a bit because you've been spending almost all your time here trying to drag Hutchinson through the mud, based on a tweet that quotes "a source close to the Secret Service."
Well, a source close to JPP says that you are on welfare. So I guess that means you're on welfare, right?
2. We haven't heard anything from the Secret Service and we never will because the source in this tweet wasn't real:
You will NEVER get it, so I'll just tell you. Disregarding the "source" part, the tweet gives you the name of the head of the security detail (most likely in the car with Trump), and mentions the limo/SUV DRIVER, who was definitely in the car with Trump, and was supposedly the "victim" of Trump's "attack". These people can be subpoenaed or invited to testify or be deposed or whatever, and they can clear this up in 5 minutes by answering a couple yes/no questions. I am worried about their safety though.You got swindled AGAIN because you're just a goddamn fucking idiot.
Oops! Too late, dumbass.The way to tell if Hutchinson was being truthful or not is
1. If the committee calls the SS agents to confirm Hutchinson's testimony. In which case she is telling the truth.
2. The committee does not invite or compel the SS to testify because they would impeach Hutchinson's testimony Because she lied.
Everybody should notice there has been ZERO effort to compel the SS agents to testify. Because Hutchinson lied through her teeth.
Why don't the pussies pretending to be the Secret Service agents volunteer to testify?

Ultimately, the fucking clown committee doesn't even WANT these guys to testify, so we don't have any indication that they did or didn't "volunteer", and it's highly unlikely we ever will. Here is a list of Trump allies who were subpoenaed last year: https://www.cnn.com/2021/11/10/politics/list-january-6-subpoenas/index.html
These are people who were going to demonstrate to the world that Trump was a megalomaniacal fascist plotting to maintain a death grip on power. What have you heard from their testimony? ...........................View attachment 22879
This whole shit show is for YOU and all the rest of the simpletons who voted for that senile old turnip. You're getting fed exactly what you want, so shut up and eat.
I would be careful who I was calling a pussy though. These guys have sworn to take a bullet for president tater head, something I wouldn't do on my most patriotic day at twice their salary. (might consider using HIM as a human/vegetable shield though)
The way to tell if Hutchinson was being truthful or not is
1. If the committee calls the SS agents to confirm Hutchinson's testimony. In which case she is telling the truth.
2. The committee does not invite or compel the SS to testify because they would impeach Hutchinson's testimony Because she lied.
Everybody should notice there has been ZERO effort to compel the SS agents to testify. Because Hutchinson lied through her teeth.
The way to tell if Hutchinson was being truthful or not is
1. If the committee calls the SS agents to confirm Hutchinson's testimony. In which case she is telling the truth.
2. The committee does not invite or compel the SS to testify because they would impeach Hutchinson's testimony Because she lied.
Everybody should notice there has been ZERO effort to compel the SS agents to testify. Because Hutchinson lied through her teeth.
Why would she put herself out there like that, just to lie?
There is no logic to that. When it comes to protecting Trump, his supporters abandon reason.
How do you know that they haven't requested his testimony, and he's stonewalling? They use subpoenas as a last resort. He is perfectly free to come forward and volunteer to testify. How do we know he has or hasn't?
What we know is the so called committee hasn't asked this SS guy to testify under oath in their show trial. If they had and he refused democrats would be screaming it at the top of their lungs. Instead we hear crickets.
You don't need an invitation to sign an affidavit.
You don't really know how things work, do you? That's probably because you're a cowardly idiot who needs others to do things for you.