Wasn't the Secret Service guy supposed to refute Hutchinson?

No real reason to refute 2nd hand hearsay

You don't even know what hearsay is, so how can you say that this is second hand? And ALL HEARSAY is second hand, you fucking imbecile.


I heard you suck on their cocks and take it up the ass from MS-13 Gang members

Really? Cause a source close to JPP says that you are the gay whore here, and that you are on welfare.
 
Ask yourself why the committee doesn't request this SS guy testifies in public and on record in order to clear this up. Ask yourself why they instead quickly move on.

You don't need an invitation to sign an affidavit.

You don't really know how things work, do you? That's probably because you're a cowardly idiot who needs others to do things for you.
 
You're so much of a little fucking bitch that you spread the lie that the election was stolen, but then when the time came to do something about it you hid out here on JPP and shitposted.

Some fuckin' patriot you are! LOL. Pfft.

Those who believe the election was stolen, and all the baggage that goes with it, fall into two groups: the mentally ill, which is, by far, the largest group and the WSEs, the smaller and far more deadly group.

It wasn't Trump and the Q anon phenomenon that was the great evil of 1/6. They were just a mob with the same collective low IQ of any mob. The great evil of Donald J. Trump is his willingness to get in bed with the WSEs, especially the ones with a deadly intention of violently taking down the US government by any means possible.

Many of them are mentally ill too but in a way far different from the wackadoodles among the Qless. Unlike them, the WSEs are not Trumpers. They are using Trump just like Trump is using them. Trump's mistake is that he thinks he can control his own Praetorian Guard.

It's interesting to note that one of the strike team Oath Keepers who attacked the Capitol on 1/6 was Jessica Watkins, a trans woman. Like the oddity that militias weren't ever mentioned during the Rittenhouse trial, there is very little mention of the fact Watkins is genetically male. WSE proponents make a big deal about how they can't be racist because they have Henry "Enrique" Tarrio, but they don't claim they are "woke" or otherwise enlightened about the rights of all Americans regardless of sexual preferences or attire.

One thought is that she was a "true believer", a die-hard who'd rather do the 20 years than give up a fellow soldier so they let her in based on that alone.

https://www.advocate.com/crime/2022...january-6-insurrection-oathkeepers-trail-case
...While some insurrectionists, like Brandon Stratka, have cut deals to provide investigators with information, others have stood their ground. Jessica Watkins, a trans woman who is one of the most prominent figures in the trials, has maintained her innocence and is set to argue her case at the end of January.

Here's everything you need to know.

Who is Jessica Watkins?
Jessica Watkins is an Army veteran. She served in the military under her former name, serving in Afghanistan from 2001 to 2003. Later, she was a first responder as a firefighter and emergency medical technician in North Carolina. She lived in Woodstock, Ohio, with her boyfriend Montana Siniff. There, she owned and operated a bar and grill with him called The Jolly Roger.

Watkins was a dues-paying member of the Oath Keepers. In addition, she formed a small, local "paramilitary group," according to Buzzfeed News, called the Ohio State Regular Militia.....

...After being arrested, in court Watkins disavowed the Oath Keepers and said she had disbanded her militia. A judge ruled that she was to remain in custody until her trial though Watkins said she was being treated unfairly as she is transgender. She said that injuries she had were not treated and she was forced to remain naked in her cell for days. Officials denied this happened.

"My name is Jessica Watkins, and I am a January 6th defendant," she wrote in a statement to The Gateway Pundit in December. " I have been incarcerated nearly a year for crimes I did not commit, so as to serve as a pawn for 'The Party' to exploit. And exploit they have." In the statement, she claimed that January 6 was a riot incited by police.

"Our charges are false, the truth manipulated, and we will one day be vindicated," she wrote....
jessica-watkins-oathkeepers.jpg
 
t wasn't Trump and the Q anon phenomenon that was the great evil of 1/6. They were just a mob with the same collective low IQ of any mob. The great evil of Donald J. Trump is his willingness to get in bed with the WSEs, especially the ones with a deadly intention of violently taking down the US government by any means possible.

Thing is that Nazis, fascists, white supremacists, bigots, homophobes and racists have ALWAYS been a part of the Conservative movement.

They've been there this whole time.

So Donald Trump didn't change anything, these people have always been like this. The reason they oppose "CRT" in schools is because they don't want to have to explain to their kids what grandma is doing in this photo:

gettyimages-517322800-2.jpg
 
You lick Porta Potties and drink the blue fluid.

A source close to JPP tells me that you like to get naked and roll around with raccoons in peanut butter and that one of the raccoons is willing to testify under oath that you spread peanut butter all over your testicles and had the raccoons lick all of it off.

Care to comment?
 
As expected he was the last person the committee wanted on the witness stand......

Bad news for you is that Ornato and Engel have both already testified to the 1/6 committee and that their testimony corroborates Hutchinson's which is why she testified publicly.

The two sources here are Ornato and Engel:

Then-President Donald Trump angrily demanded to go to the US Capitol on January 6, 2021, and berated his protective detail when he didn't get his way, according to two Secret Service sources who say they heard about the incident from multiple agents, including the driver of the presidential SUV where it occurred.

The sources tell CNN that stories circulated about the incident -- including details that are similar to how former White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson described it to the House select committee investigating January 6 -- in the months immediately afterward the US Capitol attack and before she testified this week.
https://www.cnn.com/2022/07/01/politics/secret-service-lunging-incident/index.html
 
Bad news for you is that Ornato and Engel have both already testified to the 1/6 committee and that their testimony corroborates Hutchinson's which is why she testified publicly.

The two sources here are Ornato and Engel:
Hutchinson LIED in her testimony. Her whole testimony is suspect.
 
Hutchinson LIED in her testimony. Her whole testimony is suspect.

The only liar here is you.

Hutchinson testified under oath.

Ornato testified under oath.

Engel testified under oath.

You know who hasn't? Trump and "a source close to the Secret Service."

So how come you were running your big mouth about a stolen election for two months, but then on the one day you could have done something about it, you chose to hide out here on JPP like the little fuckin' bitchass you are?
 
Ask yourself why the committee doesn't request this SS guy testifies in public and on record in order to clear this up. Ask yourself why they instead quickly move on.

How do you know that they haven't requested his testimony, and he's stonewalling? They use subpoenas as a last resort. He is perfectly free to come forward and volunteer to testify. How do we know he has or hasn't?
 
How do you know that they haven't requested his testimony, and he's stonewalling? They use subpoenas as a last resort. He is perfectly free to come forward and volunteer to testify. How do we know he has or hasn't?

because in all other cases where that happens they try to get the person thrown in jail for not complying.
 
because in all other cases where that happens they try to get the person thrown in jail for not complying.

What? That makes no sense. They can't "try to get the person thrown in jail" unless the person has refused to comply with a subpoena. Have you heard whether those agents were subpoenaed?
 
Who? What are you talking about? The secret service agents who were in the car with #TRE45ON when he allegedly tried to grab the wheel? No, not that I've heard.

so they probably haven't been subpoenaed because they've stated none of this happened and dems don't want that truth known.
 
Back
Top