Tell that to T.A. Goofy.
Trump Policies Sent U.S. Tumbling in a Climate Ranking
- Thread starter signalmankenneth
- Start date
Tell that to T.A. Goofy.
BartenderElite
Verified User
Wow - reality isn't important to you guys at all anymore, is it?
Everything I stated was true. Whether it's climate or election lies, conservatives simply don't care about facts anymore.
gfm7175
Jesus is LORD!
Thank you. And yes sir, I used my own list as a reference. This article also made for a good opportunity to add a number of new buzzwords to my list. It appears that it is going to hit 300 unique entries A LOT faster than I expected it to...
I am clearly underestimating the gibberbabble abilities of liberals. I should know better though, since Liberal is a very, let's say "flexible", language.
RQAA. Stop asking the same mindless question over and over. It's been answered.
This is another reason to keep Trump or anything like him out of the white-house again too?!! I like clean air and water and really concerned about the droughts, forest fires, floods and heat waves!!? It not only here but world-wide too?!!
[FONT=&]For four years under President Donald Trump, the United States all but stopped trying to combat climate change at the federal level. Trump is no longer in office, but his presidency left the country far behind in a race that was already difficult to win.
[/FONT]
[FONT=&]A new report from researchers at Yale and Columbia universities shows that the United States’ environmental performance has tumbled in relation to other countries — a reflection of the fact that, while the United States squandered nearly half a decade, many of its peers moved deliberately.
[/FONT]
[FONT=&]But, underscoring the profound obstacles to cutting greenhouse gas emissions rapidly enough to prevent the worst effects of climate change, even that movement was insufficient. The report’s sobering bottom line is that, while almost every country has pledged by 2050 to reach net-zero emissions (the point where their activities no longer add greenhouse gases to the atmosphere), almost none are on track to do it.
[/FONT]
[FONT=&]The report, called the Environmental Performance Index, or EPI, found that, based on their trajectories from 2010 through 2019, only Denmark and Britain were on a sustainable path to eliminate emissions by midcentury.
[/FONT]
[FONT=&]Namibia and Botswana appeared to be on track with caveats: They had stronger records than their peers in sub-Saharan Africa, but their emissions were minimal to begin with, and the researchers did not characterize their progress as sustainable because it was not clear that current policies would suffice as their economies develop.
[/FONT]
[FONT=&]The 176 other nations in the report were poised to fall short of net-zero goals, some by large margins. China, India, the United States and Russia were on track to account for more than half of global emissions in 2050. But even countries like Germany that have enacted more comprehensive climate policies are not doing enough.
[/FONT]
[FONT=&]“We think this report’s going to be a wake-up call to a wide range of countries, a number of whom might have imagined themselves to be doing what they needed to do and not many of whom really are,” said Daniel C. Esty, the director of the Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy, which produces the EPI every two years.
A United Nations report this year found that there is still time, but not much, for countries to change course and meet their targets. The case of the United States shows how gravely a few years of inaction can fling a country off course, steepening the slope of emissions reductions required to get back on.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-policies-sent-u-tumbling-115459618.html
[/FONT]
I hope Trump got us to last place. That would be so SWEET!
Buzzword fallacy. You don't know what 'reality' means.
Learn what 'fact' means.
No gas or vapor has the capability to warm the Earth. You cannot create energy out of nothing. Climate has no value. It cannot change. There is no such thing as a global climate or global weather.
Just stating your denials of physics and using buzzwords doesn't make anything true.
You're going to need some automation soon just to handle it!
That's OK. They clearly underestimate you.
That it is. That's why it's so tough maintaining such a list. Again, my congrats to you for performing this tedious work and exposing these idiots for what they are.
From the "BIG STUDY" cited as "PROOF OF HUMAN ACTIVITY AS THE PRIMARY CAUSE OF WARMING".
~"....Here we construct an observational synthesis to quantify the temperature and salinity changes over the Southern Ocean and combine this with an ensemble of co-sampled climate model simulations"
IOW, they are MAKING UP THEIR OWN "cherry-picked" , DATA, AND FORMING THEIR OWN FLAWED CONCLUSIONS.
IOW, STANDARD WARMIST BULLSHIT.
WHY CAN'T THE WARMISTS PRODUCE THE TEST I REQUESTED IN MY INITIAL POST ON THIS THREAD?
BECAUSE THEY KNOW THEY ARE FULL OF SHIT.
~"....Here we construct an observational synthesis to quantify the temperature and salinity changes over the Southern Ocean and combine this with an ensemble of co-sampled climate model simulations"
IOW, they are MAKING UP THEIR OWN "cherry-picked" , DATA, AND FORMING THEIR OWN FLAWED CONCLUSIONS.
IOW, STANDARD WARMIST BULLSHIT.
WHY CAN'T THE WARMISTS PRODUCE THE TEST I REQUESTED IN MY INITIAL POST ON THIS THREAD?
BECAUSE THEY KNOW THEY ARE FULL OF SHIT.
Matt Dillon
Retardium User
This is another reason to keep Trump or anything like him out of the white-house again too?!! I like clean air and water and really concerned about the droughts, forest fires, floods and heat waves!!? It not only here but world-wide too?!!
[FONT=&]For four years under President Donald Trump, the United States all but stopped trying to combat climate change at the federal level. Trump is no longer in office, but his presidency left the country far behind in a race that was already difficult to win.
[/FONT]
[FONT=&]A new report from researchers at Yale and Columbia universities shows that the United States’ environmental performance has tumbled in relation to other countries — a reflection of the fact that, while the United States squandered nearly half a decade, many of its peers moved deliberately.
[/FONT]
[FONT=&]But, underscoring the profound obstacles to cutting greenhouse gas emissions rapidly enough to prevent the worst effects of climate change, even that movement was insufficient. The report’s sobering bottom line is that, while almost every country has pledged by 2050 to reach net-zero emissions (the point where their activities no longer add greenhouse gases to the atmosphere), almost none are on track to do it.
[/FONT]
[FONT=&]The report, called the Environmental Performance Index, or EPI, found that, based on their trajectories from 2010 through 2019, only Denmark and Britain were on a sustainable path to eliminate emissions by midcentury.
[/FONT]
[FONT=&]Namibia and Botswana appeared to be on track with caveats: They had stronger records than their peers in sub-Saharan Africa, but their emissions were minimal to begin with, and the researchers did not characterize their progress as sustainable because it was not clear that current policies would suffice as their economies develop.
[/FONT]
[FONT=&]The 176 other nations in the report were poised to fall short of net-zero goals, some by large margins. China, India, the United States and Russia were on track to account for more than half of global emissions in 2050. But even countries like Germany that have enacted more comprehensive climate policies are not doing enough.
[/FONT]
[FONT=&]“We think this report’s going to be a wake-up call to a wide range of countries, a number of whom might have imagined themselves to be doing what they needed to do and not many of whom really are,” said Daniel C. Esty, the director of the Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy, which produces the EPI every two years.
A United Nations report this year found that there is still time, but not much, for countries to change course and meet their targets. The case of the United States shows how gravely a few years of inaction can fling a country off course, steepening the slope of emissions reductions required to get back on.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-policies-sent-u-tumbling-115459618.html
[/FONT]
Fuck your "Climate Ranking" when people are having a hard time making rent and buying gas and food.
Matt Dillon
Retardium User
They never include grass because it remove 400% more "greenhouse gas" (CO2) from the air than the highest plant they list.
It's nothing but a wealth redistribution scam.
PS: It's the epitome of ignorance and arrogance to think that puny man can affect the world's weather cycles and natural disasters in any meaningful way whatsoever.
BartenderElite
Verified User
I've never understood that last take. Individually, we're puny - but there are billions of us.
Puny us has wiped out all kinds of habitats, sent many species to extinction, absolutely devastated some waterways, polluted the air and water, caused things like acid rain, consumed fossil fuels at exponential rates, et al. We've had a dramatic impact on the planet in just a few hundred years since the industrial revolution.
I'm not really worried about the planet. The planet will discard us and move on if we destroy it to a certain point. It will recover. It's humans we have to worry about - we are not living sustainably, at all. And we're ignoring MANY warning signs regarding this.
Matt Dillon
Retardium User
So let's make the world suffer in the name of Global Warming which is a lie?
I'm all against polluting the earth irresponsibly, but Global Warming is not on that track at all.
It's a full-on totalitarian control grab/starve the masses plan.
https://www.democratsagainstunagenda21.com/
No American in their right mind that knew better would sign up for that.
And Biden has helped it along greatly.
All that "sustainable" bullshit means it's UN Agenda 21 related and wants to reduce the population of earth to 512 million with a one world Central government.
Nestle talks "sustainable" while they drain South American villages dry of the water they needed for life to sell it in bottles worldwide.
Last edited:
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
no.......it isn't........deal with it......
cancel2 2022
Canceled
.
Prof. Richard Lindzen author of over 200 papers on climate and atmospheric physics.
“Climate science has been targeted by a major political movement, environmentalism, as the focus of their efforts, wherein the natural disasters of the earth system, have come to be identified with man's activities - engendering fear as well as an agenda for societal reform and control... This greatly facilitates any conscious effort to politicize science via influence in such bodies where a handful of individuals (often not even scientists) speak on behalf of organizations that include thousands of scientists, and even enforce specific scientific positions and agendas.”
“Under true peer-review...a panel of reviewers must accept a study before it can be published in a scientific journal. If the reviewers have objections the author must answer them or change the article to take reviewers' objections into account. Under the IPCC review process, the authors are at liberty to ignore criticisms.”
“Scientists who dissent from the alarmism have seen their grant funds disappear, their work derided, and themselves libeled as industry stooges, scientific hacks or worse. Consequently, lies about climate change gain credence even when they fly in the face of the science that supposedly is their basis.”
Professor Nir Shaviv @nshaviv is the chairman of the Racah Institute of Physics at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
“Science is not a democracy: ‘Even if one hundred per cent of all scientists hold a certain thesis, one person who has good evidence for the counter-thesis can still be right.’”
"The paper shows that if cosmic rays are included in empirical climate sensitivity analyses, then one finds that different time scales consistently give a low climate sensitivity. i.e., it supports the idea that cosmic rays affect the climate and that climate sensitivity is low".
Dr. Judith A. Curry is an American climatologist and former chair of the School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at the Georgia Institute of Technology.
"I am broadly concerned about the slow death of free speech, but particularly in universities and also with regards to the climate change debate".
"I am arguing that climate models are not fit for the purpose of detection and attribution of climate change on decadal to multidecadal timescales".
John Christy is a climate scientist at the University of Alabama in Huntsville whose chief interests are satellite remote sensing of global climate and global climate change. He is best known, jointly with Roy Spencer, for the first successful development of a satellite temperature record
"I looked at 73 climate models going back to 1979 and every single one predicted more warming than happened in the real world".
"it is fairly well agreed that the surface temperature will rise about 1°C as a modest response to a doubling of atmospheric CO2 if the rest of the component processes of the climate system remain independent of this response".
Prof. Richard Lindzen author of over 200 papers on climate and atmospheric physics.
“Climate science has been targeted by a major political movement, environmentalism, as the focus of their efforts, wherein the natural disasters of the earth system, have come to be identified with man's activities - engendering fear as well as an agenda for societal reform and control... This greatly facilitates any conscious effort to politicize science via influence in such bodies where a handful of individuals (often not even scientists) speak on behalf of organizations that include thousands of scientists, and even enforce specific scientific positions and agendas.”
“Under true peer-review...a panel of reviewers must accept a study before it can be published in a scientific journal. If the reviewers have objections the author must answer them or change the article to take reviewers' objections into account. Under the IPCC review process, the authors are at liberty to ignore criticisms.”
“Scientists who dissent from the alarmism have seen their grant funds disappear, their work derided, and themselves libeled as industry stooges, scientific hacks or worse. Consequently, lies about climate change gain credence even when they fly in the face of the science that supposedly is their basis.”
Professor Nir Shaviv @nshaviv is the chairman of the Racah Institute of Physics at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
“Science is not a democracy: ‘Even if one hundred per cent of all scientists hold a certain thesis, one person who has good evidence for the counter-thesis can still be right.’”
"The paper shows that if cosmic rays are included in empirical climate sensitivity analyses, then one finds that different time scales consistently give a low climate sensitivity. i.e., it supports the idea that cosmic rays affect the climate and that climate sensitivity is low".
Dr. Judith A. Curry is an American climatologist and former chair of the School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at the Georgia Institute of Technology.
"I am broadly concerned about the slow death of free speech, but particularly in universities and also with regards to the climate change debate".
"I am arguing that climate models are not fit for the purpose of detection and attribution of climate change on decadal to multidecadal timescales".
John Christy is a climate scientist at the University of Alabama in Huntsville whose chief interests are satellite remote sensing of global climate and global climate change. He is best known, jointly with Roy Spencer, for the first successful development of a satellite temperature record
"I looked at 73 climate models going back to 1979 and every single one predicted more warming than happened in the real world".
"it is fairly well agreed that the surface temperature will rise about 1°C as a modest response to a doubling of atmospheric CO2 if the rest of the component processes of the climate system remain independent of this response".
Last edited:
So where is the research?
gemini104104
Verified User
This is another reason to keep Trump or anything like him out of the white-house again too?!! I like clean air and water and really concerned about the droughts, forest fires, floods and heat waves!!? It not only here but world-wide too?!!
[FONT=&]For four years under President Donald Trump, the United States all but stopped trying to combat climate change at the federal level. Trump is no longer in office, but his presidency left the country far behind in a race that was already difficult to win.
[/FONT]
[FONT=&]A new report from researchers at Yale and Columbia universities shows that the United States’ environmental performance has tumbled in relation to other countries — a reflection of the fact that, while the United States squandered nearly half a decade, many of its peers moved deliberately.
[/FONT]
[FONT=&]But, underscoring the profound obstacles to cutting greenhouse gas emissions rapidly enough to prevent the worst effects of climate change, even that movement was insufficient. The report’s sobering bottom line is that, while almost every country has pledged by 2050 to reach net-zero emissions (the point where their activities no longer add greenhouse gases to the atmosphere), almost none are on track to do it.
[/FONT]
[FONT=&]The report, called the Environmental Performance Index, or EPI, found that, based on their trajectories from 2010 through 2019, only Denmark and Britain were on a sustainable path to eliminate emissions by midcentury.
[/FONT]
[FONT=&]Namibia and Botswana appeared to be on track with caveats: They had stronger records than their peers in sub-Saharan Africa, but their emissions were minimal to begin with, and the researchers did not characterize their progress as sustainable because it was not clear that current policies would suffice as their economies develop.
[/FONT]
[FONT=&]The 176 other nations in the report were poised to fall short of net-zero goals, some by large margins. China, India, the United States and Russia were on track to account for more than half of global emissions in 2050. But even countries like Germany that have enacted more comprehensive climate policies are not doing enough.
[/FONT]
[FONT=&]“We think this report’s going to be a wake-up call to a wide range of countries, a number of whom might have imagined themselves to be doing what they needed to do and not many of whom really are,” said Daniel C. Esty, the director of the Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy, which produces the EPI every two years.
A United Nations report this year found that there is still time, but not much, for countries to change course and meet their targets. The case of the United States shows how gravely a few years of inaction can fling a country off course, steepening the slope of emissions reductions required to get back on.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-policies-sent-u-tumbling-115459618.html
[/FONT]
Numerous policies of the lawlessly hacked in pig and tyrant tRump, in particular, almost created a second great global depression and other unspeakable atrocities on planet Earth. This, until fortunately the blue wave of the unobstructed majority of 2020 and by the grace of the almighty God ensured that tRump and his lawlessly hacked in team of destroyers got the boot, and regardless of their reaction of waging insurrectionist and other rancid types of seditious repuke war on the fair, secure and lawful 2020 national election proceeding in President Biden's favor. This includes President Biden being awarded among the majority with the highest vote of any POTUS in history, and that crushed tRump and his repukes' efforts to flunk up another election in the devil's favor:
Trump Is Making The Same Trade Mistake That Started The Great Depression
We all wonder if Trump’s trade actions are as random as they appear or if there is a broader strategy.
Some of my contacts argue that the relatively strong U.S. economy allows the administration to take a harder line than would normally be advisable.
The thinking is that we can ride out a trade war better than China can.
This only works if the U.S. economy keeps growing long enough for the tariffs to make China bend. We can postpone a recession for another year or two if the trade war doesn’t intensify and Europe holds together.
We all wonder if Trump’s trade actions are as random as they appear or if there is a broader strategy.
Some of my contacts argue that the relatively strong U.S. economy allows the administration to take a harder line than would normally be advisable.
The thinking is that we can ride out a trade war better than China can.
This only works if the U.S. economy keeps growing long enough for the tariffs to make China bend. We can postpone a recession for another year or two if the trade war doesn’t intensify and Europe holds together."
https://www.forbes.com/sites/johnma...started-the-great-depression/?sh=361ee61a44be
The legacy of tRump who as a former imposter, deserves an approval rating in a rat shit crazy outhouse.
Last edited:
cancel2 2022
Canceled
Roy Spencer is a principal research scientist at the UAH and the team leader for the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer (AMSR-E) on NASA's Aqua satellite. He has served as senior scientist for climate studies at NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center.
Al Gore likes to say that mankind puts 70 million tons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere every day. What he probably doesn't know is that Mother Nature puts 24,000 times that amount of our main greenhouse gas-water vapor-into the atmosphere every day and removes about the same amount every day. While this does not 'prove' that global warming is not man-made, it shows that weather systems have by far the greatest control over the Earth's greenhouse effect, which is dominated by water vapor and clouds.
I would wager that my job has helped save our economy from the economic ravages of out-of-control environmental extremism. I view my job a little like a legislator, supported by the taxpayer, to protect the interests of the taxpayer and to minimize the role of government.
It is well known that strong to violent tornado activity in the US has decreased markedly since statistics began in the 1950s, which has also been a period of average warming. So, if anything, global warming causes FEWER tornado outbreaks...not more. In other words, more violent tornados would, if anything, be a sign of 'global cooling,' not 'global warming.'
Last edited:
ExpressLane
Verified User
Al Gore's college transcripts shows he flunked science.
cancel2 2022
Canceled
According to his Harvard transcript, he earned a D in natural science in his sophomore year.
Crazy Night is back claiming insulation is impossible, and therefore not just house insulation, but also something as simple as a winter coat, is impossible. Science moved past him, a few hundred thousand years ago.
The reality is the atmosphere can hold in more or less heat.