Trump Policies Sent U.S. Tumbling in a Climate Ranking

[cancel2 2022]

Actually, it has already been presented. It is being ignored by politicians, those invested in Gorebal Warming, and other interests because it doesn't fit their agenda.

https://www.earthdata.nasa.gov/learn/sensing-our-planet/on-the-trail-of-contrails
https://e360.yale.edu/features/how-airplane-contrails-are-helping-make-the-planet-warmer
https://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/vapor_warming.html

Of course it has, over and over. I have posted many papers over the years from many journals including Nature and Science but apparently APL never sees them, the very epitome of wilful ignorance.

[B

The Imaginary Climate Crisis: How can we Change the Message? A talk by Richard Lindzen[/b]

https://clintel.org/the-imaginary-c...change-the-message-a-talk-by-richard-lindzen/

 

[Into the Night]

I've never understood that last take. Individually, we're puny - but there are billions of us.

Puny us has wiped out all kinds of habitats, sent many species to extinction, absolutely devastated some waterways, polluted the air and water, caused things like acid rain, consumed fossil fuels at exponential rates, et al. We've had a dramatic impact on the planet in just a few hundred years since the industrial revolution.

I'm not really worried about the planet. The planet will discard us and move on if we destroy it to a certain point. It will recover. It's humans we have to worry about - we are not living sustainably, at all. And we're ignoring MANY warning signs regarding this.

What warning signs? If humans aren't living sustainably, why are there more and more of us? You even complained about that at one point. Fossils aren't used as fuel. What do you consider a 'dramatic effect on the planet'? You said you aren't worried about the planet.

 

[Into the Night]

.
Prof. Richard Lindzen author of over 200 papers on climate and atmospheric physics.

There is no such thing as 'climate physics'.

.
“Climate science

There is no such thing as 'climate science'. There is no branch of science called 'climate'.

.
has been targeted by a major political movement, environmentalism, as the focus of their efforts, wherein the natural disasters of the earth system, have come to be identified with man's activities - engendering fear as well as an agenda for societal reform and control... This greatly facilitates any conscious effort to politicize science

Science has no politics.

.
via influence in such bodies where a handful of individuals (often not even scientists) speak on behalf of organizations that include thousands of scientists, and even enforce specific scientific positions and agendas.”

Science has no position. Science has no agenda.

.
“Under true peer-review...a panel of reviewers must accept a study before it can be published in a scientific journal.

Science does not use consensus. There is no voting bloc in science.

.
If the reviewers have objections the author must answer them or change the article to take reviewers' objections into account. Under the IPCC review process, the authors are at liberty to ignore criticisms.”

Science is not a government panel or agency.

.
“Scientists who dissent from the alarmism have seen their grant funds disappear, their work derided, and themselves libeled as industry stooges, scientific hacks or worse. Consequently, lies about climate change gain credence even when they fly in the face of the science that supposedly is their basis.”

There is no such thing as 'climate science'. Climate cannot change. There is no value associated with climate. The Church of Global Warming routinely discards the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics and the Stefan-Boltzmann law. I've also seen them discard Thenevin's law and the ideal gas law.

.
Professor Nir Shaviv @nshaviv is the chairman of the Racah Institute of Physics at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.

“Science is not a democracy: ‘Even if one hundred per cent of all scientists hold a certain thesis, one person who has good evidence for the counter-thesis can still be right.’”

This is correct. There is no voting bloc in science.

.
"The paper shows that if cosmic rays are included in empirical climate sensitivity analyses,

Climate doesn't have a sensitivity.

.
then one finds that different time scales consistently give a low climate sensitivity. i.e., it supports the idea that cosmic rays affect the climate and that climate sensitivity is low".

Climate doesn't have a sensitivity.

.
Dr. Judith A. Curry is an American climatologist and former chair of the School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at the Georgia Institute of Technology.

There is no branch of science called 'climate'.

.
"I am broadly concerned about the slow death of free speech, but particularly in universities and also with regards to the climate change debate".

What's she been hiding under? A rock?

.
"I am arguing that climate models are not fit for the purpose of detection and attribution of climate change on decadal to multidecadal timescales".

Climate cannot change. There is no value associated with climate.

.
John Christy is a climate scientist

There is no branch of science called 'climate'. Science has no branch about a subjective word.

.
at the University of Alabama in Huntsville whose chief interests are satellite remote sensing of global climate

Climate has no value associated with it. There is nothing to measure. There is no such thing as a global climate.

.
and global climate change.

Climate has no value associated with it. It cannot change.

.
He is best known, jointly with Roy Spencer, for the first successful development of a satellite temperature record

Satellites cannot measure the temperature of the Earth. It is not possible to measure the temperature of the Earth. The emissivity of Earth is unknown and likewise cannot be measured.

.
"I looked at 73 climate models going back to 1979 and every single one predicted more warming than happened in the real world".

There is no data. It is not possible to measure the temperature of the Earth.

.
"it is fairly well agreed that the surface temperature will rise about 1°C as a modest response to a doubling of atmospheric CO2 if the rest of the component processes of the climate system remain independent of this response".

No gas or vapor has the capability to warm the Earth. You cannot create energy from nothing. See the 1st law of thermodynamics.

 

[Into the Night]

So where is the research?

RQAA. Stop asking the same mindless question over and over. It's been answered.

 

[Into the Night]

So where is the research?

RQAA. Stop asking the same mindless question over and over. It's been answered.

 

[AProudLefty]

RQAA. Stop asking the same mindless question over and over. It's been answered.

Lie. Trolling.

 

[Into the Night]

Numerous policies of the lawlessly hacked in pig and tyrant tRump, in particular, almost created a second great global depression

We are in a depression now. Not caused by Trump.

and other unspeakable atrocities on planet Earth.

....such as? Void argument fallacy.

This, until fortunately the blue wave of the unobstructed majority of 2020

The president it not elected by popular vote. There was no election in 2020.

and by the grace of the almighty God ensured that tRump and his lawlessly hacked in team of destroyers got the boot,

You don't like Trump and you have a bad case of TDS. I already knew that.

and regardless of their reaction of waging insurrectionist

Antifa and BLM are supported by Democrats, dude. Not Trump. The silent coup was performed by Democrats, dude. Not Trump.

and other rancid types of seditious repuke war on the fair, secure and lawful 2020 national election proceeding in President Biden's favor.

There was no election in 2020. The election faulted due to election fraud by Democrats.

This includes President Biden being awarded among the majority with the highest vote of any POTUS in history,

Presidents are not elected by popular vote. Biden was not elected. He was installed.

and that crushed tRump and his repukes' efforts to flunk up another election in the devil's favor:

There was no election in 2020.

Trump Is Making The Same Trade Mistake That Started The Great Depression

No. It was Democrats that shut down the economy. Trump is not a Democrat.

We all wonder if Trump’s trade actions are as random as they appear or if there is a broader strategy.

Some of my contacts argue that the relatively strong U.S. economy allows the administration to take a harder line than would normally be advisable.

What strong economy?

The thinking is that we can ride out a trade war better than China can.

Only because China is worse off then the States.

This only works if the U.S. economy keeps growing

It isn't growing.

long enough for the tariffs to make China bend.

You mean the tariffs that Trump implemented? I thought you didn't like Trump.

We can postpone a recession for another year or two if the trade war doesn’t intensify and Europe holds together.

The States are in an economic depression, dude.

The legacy of tRump who as a former imposter,

Trump was never an imposter of Trump.

deserves an approval rating in a rat shit crazy outhouse.

An interesting way of describing government.

 

[gfm7175]

There is no such thing as 'climate physics'.

This buzzword has now been added to The List.

There is no such thing as 'climate science'. There is no branch of science called 'climate'.

This buzzword I already have on The List. It's a rather common one, per my experience.

Science has no position. Science has no agenda.

'Scientific position' and 'scientific agenda' have now been added to The List.

Science does not use consensus. There is no voting bloc in science.

This buzzword is obviously already on The List. It gets used ALL THE TIME...

Climate doesn't have a sensitivity.

Climate doesn't have a sensitivity.

Already on The List.

Climate has no value associated with it. There is nothing to measure. There is no such thing as a global climate.

'Global climate sensing' is now on The List.


I'm sure it's quite obvious to you by now just how fast this list can grow (and does grow!), even via manual entry. 300 is very rapidly approaching.

 

[Into the Night]

Roy Spencer is a principal research scientist at the UAH and the team leader for the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer (AMSR-E) on NASA's Aqua satellite. He has served as senior scientist for climate studies at NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center.

There is no branch of science called 'climate'.

Al Gore likes to say that mankind puts 70 million tons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere every day.

So? Al Gore likes to make up numbers.

What he probably doesn't know is that Mother Nature puts 24,000 times that amount of our main greenhouse gas-water vapor

Argument from randU fallacy. You are also making up numbers. You are no better than Al Gore in this. No gas or vapor has the capability to warm the Earth. See the 1st law of thermodynamics.

-into the atmosphere every day and removes about the same amount every day. While this does not 'prove' that global warming

It is not possible to measure the temperature of the Earth.

is not man-made, it shows that weather systems have by far the greatest control over the Earth's greenhouse effect,

No such thing. No gas or vapor has the capability to warm the Earth. You cannot create energy out of nothing.

which is dominated by water vapor and clouds.

Not gas or vapor means NO GAS OR VAPOR.

I would wager that my job has helped save our economy from the economic ravages of out-of-control environmental extremism. I view my job a little like a legislator, supported by the taxpayer, to protect the interests of the taxpayer and to minimize the role of government.

If this is true, good for you.

It is well known that strong to violent tornado activity in the US has decreased markedly since statistics began in the 1950s,

You are making up numbers again. It is not possible to measure total tornado activity. The data that we do have does not show any increase or decrease.

which has also been a period of average warming.

It is not possible to measure the temperature of the United States or of Earth.

So, if anything, global warming causes FEWER tornado outbreaks...not more.

Conclusion based on random numbers. Circular argument fallacy (fundamentalism).

In other words, more violent tornados would, if anything, be a sign of 'global cooling,' not 'global warming.'

No.

A tornado forms because of unstable air. That is air that has a greater temperature difference between the surface and upper air that is greater than usual. It does not show global warming, cooling, or anything else about the temperature of the Earth.
It is not possible to measure the temperature of the Earth.

 

[Into the Night]

According to his Harvard transcript, he earned a D in natural science in his sophomore year.

So what? Science is not a course in a university nor a university itself, nor a grade.
Making up numbers and using them as data have nothing to do with science.

 

[Into the Night]

Crazy Night is back claiming insulation is impossible, and therefore not just house insulation, but also something as simple as a winter coat, is impossible.

Word stuffing. I never insulation was impossible. These devices simply reduce heat.

Science moved past him, a few hundred thousand years ago.

Science has no age.

The reality is the atmosphere can hold in more or less heat.

No, it can't. Heat is not contained in anything. See the 2nd law of thermodynamics.

 

[Into the Night]

This buzzword has now been added to The List.


This buzzword I already have on The List. It's a rather common one, per my experience.


'Scientific position' and 'scientific agenda' have now been added to The List.


This buzzword is obviously already on The List. It gets used ALL THE TIME...


Already on The List.


'Global climate sensing' is now on The List.


I'm sure it's quite obvious to you by now just how fast this list can grow (and does grow!), even via manual entry. 300 is very rapidly approaching.

Wow. All from a single post.

 

[Walt]

I never insulation was impossible....Heat is not contained in anything.

Make up your mind.

 

[Into the Night]

Make up your mind.

?

 

[Into the Night]

Make up your mind.

?

 

[T. A. Gardner]

Word stuffing. I never insulation was impossible. These devices simply reduce heat.

No, insulation reduces the rate at which heat is transferred between two points.

No, it can't. Heat is not contained in anything. See the 2nd law of thermodynamics.

The amount of heat the Earth's atmosphere can hold is variable depending on what sources are heating it and how well it either reflects heat or absorbs it. See albedo for example.

 

[cancel2 2022]

No, insulation reduces the rate at which heat is transferred between two points.



The amount of heat the Earth's atmosphere can hold is variable depending on what sources are heating it and how well it either reflects heat or absorbs it. See albedo for example.

Sadly ITN is stuck in the 19th century regarding physics. It's as if the 20th century, Planck, Schrodinger, Heisenberg and de Broglie never existed.

 

[cancel2 2022]

So what? Science is not a course in a university nor a university itself, nor a grade.
Making up numbers and using them as data have nothing to do with science.

You belong in an institution, a mental one!

 

[cancel2 2022]

Wow. All from a single post.

Good to see you've resurrected your feathered butt kisser who parrots your every word.

 

[Into the Night]

No, insulation reduces the rate at which heat is transferred between two points.

Heat is not transferred or transferable. Heat is not contained in anything.

The amount of heat the Earth's atmosphere can hold

Heat is not contained in anything.

is variable depending on what sources are heating it and how well it either reflects heat or absorbs it.

Heat is not reflected or absorbed. Heat is not light.

See albedo for example.

This buzzword again? Obviously you are confusing heat with light, and you are also denying the 0th and 2nd law of thermodynamics and the Stefan-Boltzmann law.