Trump Policies Sent U.S. Tumbling in a Climate Ranking

This is another reason to keep Trump or anything like him out of the white-house again too?!! I like clean air and water and really concerned about the droughts, forest fires, floods and heat waves!!? It not only here but world-wide too?!!

[FONT=&]For four years under President Donald Trump, the United States all but stopped trying to combat climate change at the federal level. Trump is no longer in office, but his presidency left the country far behind in a race that was already difficult to win.
[/FONT]

[FONT=&]A new report from researchers at Yale and Columbia universities shows that the United States’ environmental performance has tumbled in relation to other countries — a reflection of the fact that, while the United States squandered nearly half a decade, many of its peers moved deliberately.
[/FONT]

[FONT=&]But, underscoring the profound obstacles to cutting greenhouse gas emissions rapidly enough to prevent the worst effects of climate change, even that movement was insufficient. The report’s sobering bottom line is that, while almost every country has pledged by 2050 to reach net-zero emissions (the point where their activities no longer add greenhouse gases to the atmosphere), almost none are on track to do it.
[/FONT]

[FONT=&]The report, called the Environmental Performance Index, or EPI, found that, based on their trajectories from 2010 through 2019, only Denmark and Britain were on a sustainable path to eliminate emissions by midcentury.
[/FONT]

[FONT=&]Namibia and Botswana appeared to be on track with caveats: They had stronger records than their peers in sub-Saharan Africa, but their emissions were minimal to begin with, and the researchers did not characterize their progress as sustainable because it was not clear that current policies would suffice as their economies develop.
[/FONT]

[FONT=&]The 176 other nations in the report were poised to fall short of net-zero goals, some by large margins. China, India, the United States and Russia were on track to account for more than half of global emissions in 2050. But even countries like Germany that have enacted more comprehensive climate policies are not doing enough.
[/FONT]

[FONT=&]“We think this report’s going to be a wake-up call to a wide range of countries, a number of whom might have imagined themselves to be doing what they needed to do and not many of whom really are,” said Daniel C. Esty, the director of the Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy, which produces the EPI every two years.

A United Nations report this year found that there is still time, but not much, for countries to change course and meet their targets. The case of the United States shows how gravely a few years of inaction can fling a country off course, steepening the slope of emissions reductions required to get back on.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-policies-sent-u-tumbling-115459618.html
[/FONT]

trump_climate_change_denial__steve_greenberg.jpg



climate28s.jpg

The thing is, trump would have been fine with regulations being the way they are, he didn't do it to "help business". He just did it to troll Democats. trump is such an evil fk.
 
Who cares? Gorebal Warming is bullshit. Climate change happens, but not for the reasons the Left is pandering...

_vpUa.qR4e-small-AOCs-says-world-will-end-in.jpg


We have about 8 years left then we all die, at least according to the likes of AOC...

LOL. Sure. It's only all scientists who disagree with you. Keep it up, sport :)
 
Kenny, you and United Nations can blow it out your ass. Take your pissing and moaning to India and China.

All scientists disagree with you but don't let that stop you, beautiful :)

And just because I know you love it when I do this: Zero for three :)
 
Some people will believe anything they are told, they have zero capacity to think for themselves.

Its a very sad story.
 
This is another reason to keep Trump or anything like him out of the white-house again too?!! I like clean air and water and really concerned about the droughts, forest fires, floods and heat waves!!? It not only here but world-wide too?!!

[FONT=&]For four years under President Donald Trump, the United States all but stopped trying to combat climate change at the federal level. Trump is no longer in office, but his presidency left the country far behind in a race that was already difficult to win.
[/FONT]

[FONT=&]A new report from researchers at Yale and Columbia universities shows that the United States’ environmental performance has tumbled in relation to other countries — a reflection of the fact that, while the United States squandered nearly half a decade, many of its peers moved deliberately.
[/FONT]

[FONT=&]But, underscoring the profound obstacles to cutting greenhouse gas emissions rapidly enough to prevent the worst effects of climate change, even that movement was insufficient. The report’s sobering bottom line is that, while almost every country has pledged by 2050 to reach net-zero emissions (the point where their activities no longer add greenhouse gases to the atmosphere), almost none are on track to do it.
[/FONT]

[FONT=&]The report, called the Environmental Performance Index, or EPI, found that, based on their trajectories from 2010 through 2019, only Denmark and Britain were on a sustainable path to eliminate emissions by midcentury.
[/FONT]

[FONT=&]Namibia and Botswana appeared to be on track with caveats: They had stronger records than their peers in sub-Saharan Africa, but their emissions were minimal to begin with, and the researchers did not characterize their progress as sustainable because it was not clear that current policies would suffice as their economies develop.
[/FONT]

[FONT=&]The 176 other nations in the report were poised to fall short of net-zero goals, some by large margins. China, India, the United States and Russia were on track to account for more than half of global emissions in 2050. But even countries like Germany that have enacted more comprehensive climate policies are not doing enough.
[/FONT]

[FONT=&]“We think this report’s going to be a wake-up call to a wide range of countries, a number of whom might have imagined themselves to be doing what they needed to do and not many of whom really are,” said Daniel C. Esty, the director of the Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy, which produces the EPI every two years.

A United Nations report this year found that there is still time, but not much, for countries to change course and meet their targets. The case of the United States shows how gravely a few years of inaction can fling a country off course, steepening the slope of emissions reductions required to get back on.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-policies-sent-u-tumbling-115459618.html
[/FONT]

trump_climate_change_denial__steve_greenberg.jpg



climate28s.jpg

tRump's policies as a lawlessly hacked in swine against humanity amounts to a policy of shit.
 
This is another reason to keep Trump or anything like him out of the white-house again too?!! I like clean air and water and really concerned about the droughts, forest fires, floods and heat waves!!? It not only here but world-wide too?!!

[FONT=&]For four years under President Donald Trump, the United States all but stopped trying to combat climate change at the federal level. Trump is no longer in office, but his presidency left the country far behind in a race that was already difficult to win.
[/FONT]

[FONT=&]A new report from researchers at Yale and Columbia universities shows that the United States’ environmental performance has tumbled in relation to other countries — a reflection of the fact that, while the United States squandered nearly half a decade, many of its peers moved deliberately.
[/FONT]

[FONT=&]But, underscoring the profound obstacles to cutting greenhouse gas emissions rapidly enough to prevent the worst effects of climate change, even that movement was insufficient. The report’s sobering bottom line is that, while almost every country has pledged by 2050 to reach net-zero emissions (the point where their activities no longer add greenhouse gases to the atmosphere), almost none are on track to do it.
[/FONT]

[FONT=&]The report, called the Environmental Performance Index, or EPI, found that, based on their trajectories from 2010 through 2019, only Denmark and Britain were on a sustainable path to eliminate emissions by midcentury.
[/FONT]

[FONT=&]Namibia and Botswana appeared to be on track with caveats: They had stronger records than their peers in sub-Saharan Africa, but their emissions were minimal to begin with, and the researchers did not characterize their progress as sustainable because it was not clear that current policies would suffice as their economies develop.
[/FONT]

[FONT=&]The 176 other nations in the report were poised to fall short of net-zero goals, some by large margins. China, India, the United States and Russia were on track to account for more than half of global emissions in 2050. But even countries like Germany that have enacted more comprehensive climate policies are not doing enough.
[/FONT]

[FONT=&]“We think this report’s going to be a wake-up call to a wide range of countries, a number of whom might have imagined themselves to be doing what they needed to do and not many of whom really are,” said Daniel C. Esty, the director of the Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy, which produces the EPI every two years.

A United Nations report this year found that there is still time, but not much, for countries to change course and meet their targets. The case of the United States shows how gravely a few years of inaction can fling a country off course, steepening the slope of emissions reductions required to get back on.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-policies-sent-u-tumbling-115459618.html
[/FONT]

trump_climate_change_denial__steve_greenberg.jpg



climate28s.jpg

Actually, the climate pretty much would be greater should tRump and his fellow un-American and insidious repukes who are at war against democracy and the soul of humanity on Earth in league with their foreign connection of the gutter would suddenly vanish into thin air!
 
Would you please post a test ,using SCIENTIFIC METHOD, proving the THERMAL RETENTION PROPERTIES OF .0004 atmospheric concentrations of CO2 ??

Not some bullshit Climatista OPINION PIECE making UNSUBSTANTIATED CLAIMS.


AN ACTUAL CHEMICAL/THERMAL TEST....doing what I specified.

tRump was lawlessly hacked in there among his cabinet of the sewer to wage war on the U.S. and anything else of a civilized nature on Earth to do the bidding of the external and enemy form within for the following atrocious reasons why:

15 ways the Trump administration has changed environmental policies
For the past three years, National Geographic has been tracking how this administration's decisions will influence air, water, and wildlife.

Since the Trump administration took office, it has been fighting what they call an “anti-growth” agenda put in place by the Obama administration. Regulations that required businesses to spend time and money to meet the former administration's environmental standards were swiftly reviewed and, in many cases, rolled back.

National Geographic has been tracking the decisions that will impact America's land, water, air, and wildlife. What started with curtailing information when the president took office in 2017 has evolved into actions like executive orders that open public land for business.

States, municipalities, and NGOs have responded to these changes by filing lawsuits to block the administration. Some, like lawsuits against the Keystone XL pipeline, have successfully kept public land closed to additional development."

https://www.nationalgeographic.com/...ays-trump-administration-impacted-environment

Yet at recovering from atrocities associated with the former lawlessly hacked in tRump un-American influence on humanity, President Biden has implemented efforts to correct atrocities left behind by the tRump insurgency of rot:

President Biden, EPA Announce $1 Billion Investment from the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law Will Significantly Accelerate Cleanup and Restoration of Great Lakes
EPA Projects Work to Be Completed at 22 of 25 Remaining Great Lakes “Areas of Concern” by 2030

WASHINGTON (Feb. 17, 2021) – Today, President Biden and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Michael S. Regan will announce that as a direct result of the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, EPA will make significant progress in the clean-up and restoration of the Great Lakes’ most environmentally degraded sites, securing clean water and a better environment for millions of Americans in the Great Lakes region. The agency will use the bulk of the $1 billion investment in the Great Lakes from the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law to clean up and restore severely degraded sites, known as “Areas of Concern” or AOCs. This will allow for a major acceleration of progress that will deliver significant environmental, economic, health, and recreational benefits for communities throughout the Great Lakes region.

“The Great Lakes are a vital economic engine and an irreplaceable environmental wonder, supplying drinking water for more than 40 million people, supporting more than 1.3 million jobs, and sustaining life for thousands of species. Through the investments from President Biden’s Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, we will make unprecedented progress in our efforts to restore and protect the waters and the communities of the Great Lakes basin,” said EPA Administrator Michael S. Regan. “Building a better America means investing in our natural resources and the communities they support.”

https://www.epa.gov/newsreleases/pr...investment-bipartisan-infrastructure-law-will
 
Last edited:
Bad analogy. It's more like a bunch of "scientists" are mostly paid money to study 'climate change' and to find out whether CO2 is causing it or not. These "scientists" then "discover" that CO2 is doing this because that will get them more funding to continue studying CO2. It's as much a sham as it is a business.

If suddenly the money were on studying aircraft contrails and whether these caused Gorebal Warming, they would become the new hot topic because that's were the money is.

One proof of this being a scam is that those perpetrating it haven't been able to win lawsuits brought against those denying the supposed research those supporting it have been doing. For all intents, all you are doing is making an argument from repetition and little more using an appeal to authority as its basis.

So present your research. End the hoax once and for all. What are you waiting for?
 
The thing is, trump would have been fine with regulations being the way they are, he didn't do it to "help business". He just did it to troll Democats. trump is such an evil fk.
Trump is going to base his energy policy to troll? :rolleyes:
actually that sounds like Biden who simply must undo every single executive order trump wrote.
The truth is less regulations /costs of compliance and taxes all favor business growth
 
Trump is going to base his energy policy to troll? :rolleyes:

Trump HAD NO POLICIES, YOU SILLY PERSON! So absolutely, he was just doing it to be a dick.

actually that sounds like Biden who simply must undo every single executive order trump wrote.

You MAGA hypocrites are hilarious the way you lick your own ass in front of everyone. You shitheads bitch for years about Obama's Executive orders. Trump signs a million of them, holding each one up like an elementary kid holding up art project and NOW you have a problem with executive actions.

It's amazing how you guys can't see what losers you are.


The truth is less regulations /costs of compliance and taxes all favor business growth

The truth is, kiss my ass, loser.
 
Trump is going to base his energy policy to troll? :rolleyes:
actually that sounds like Biden who simply must undo every single executive order trump wrote.
The truth is less regulations /costs of compliance and taxes all favor business growth

He's seriously unhinged, looks like DP are using JPP to offload its flotsam and jetsam.
 
He's seriously unhinged, looks like DP are using JPP to offload its flotsam and jetsam.

You are so fortunate to have me. You want me to go somewhere else, my friend. Just say so. There are a lot of discussion boards out there and I'm positive this one can be outdone.

Just let me know, bitch. I will not stay where I am not wanted.

Go ahead. Pull the trigger. We're waiting, sunshine.
 
Oh, really?

Reefs are dying, we've lost a huge amount of habitat, more droughts & stronger storms, less clean air, more polluted water, increased melting at the poles, increased sea levels...oh, and we're in the middle of a mass extinction event.

Yeah. Just a bunch of fearmongers.

given the fact that most of that is not true and the rest greatly exaggerated, obviously yes......you are literally a fear monger.......

reefs are actually improving at this time.....if by habitat you mean land is being converted from animal habitat to human habitat - then true.....droughts and storms are actually not stronger......the air is cleaner than it was fifty years ago.......the poles are actually freezing up at the moment, the sea levels have not increased significantly despite the fear mongering you idiots engaged in......your extinction cannot come quickly enough.......

now, ocean pollution......the good news is that the lib'ruls on the east and west coast are no longer dumping their garbage in the ocean......the bad news is that despite lib'ruls being in control of Washington the only people spending any money removing islands of plastic from the ocean are private charities..........
 
Last edited:
Back
Top