Former Campaign Manager Testifies Clinton Personally Approved Trump-Russia Lie

archives said:
Provided Russian hackers who to target via algorithms to reinforce the same conspiracies you swallowed to undecided voters, and you saying it was a "personal business deal" is really kind of hilarious
Click to expand...
FB bots?? is that the Russian meddling?? that is pathetic
Do you have any idea what we did in Ukraine to foment a revolution (Euromaidan)..puuuleees

and again Kilimnik was not "Russian intelligence"- the is a Weissmann wet dream
 
dukkha said:
yu are spiningg your ass off this is meaningless
It was the Mother of all Dirty tricks, poisoned US/Russian relations and did not allow Trump
to do a Russian reset as Obama did.
Perhaps if Trump had made a deal with Putin for Crimean recognition in return for getting out of Donbas..
(spitballing)

Trump couldn't even TALK to Putin. Clinton poisoned that well

Nobody cares about 1/6. It doesnt even poll as as issue, and no this isn't some master time plan
Durham has been working on this for a long time -COVID slowed it up

Time you give it up and understand
Clinton is a vile beast with unbounded ambition she would pull crap like this, damn the consequences.
Now we know she personally "did it"
Click to expand...

So now all these conspiracies that have yet to be proven beyond Fox talk shows hurt Trump's chances to reset with Russia? And why would Trump need a reset with Russia when beginning on day one he bowed down to Putin, and is still doing it today

Durham "polls as an issue?"

And no, you believing the innuendos you are fed does not prove she "did it"
 
dukkha said:
FB bots?? is that the Russian meddling?? that is pathetic
Do you have any idea what we did in Ukraine to foment a revolution (Euromaidan)..puuuleees

and again Kilimnik was not "Russian intelligence"- the is a Weissmann wet dream
Click to expand...

Here we go, says it all when we now have to drag in the Ukraine, deflect in another direction, are you going to tell us next that Zelensky is part of the Clinton campaign's effort to do in Trump
 
archives said:
What, so Trump's own hand pick individual at the FBI started the Mueller investigation cause of what some secondary figure in Clinton's campaign supposedly
told the FBI?

Mueller did not conclude that there was no collusion, Billy Barr concluded there was no conclusion, in fact, Mueller was under the idea that his report would be picked up by Congress for further review since he knew Barr believed in the Imperial Presidency bullshit

Two impeachments were based on facts, unfortunately, the world knew with the GOP Senate they weren't going beyond showing the facts, had nothing to do with Pelosi, she already had Trump's number embarrassing him over and over, which is why you hated her

And I could care less about Trump being convicted, history will be his judge, besides, with his army of attorneys and accountants, he'll be dead before any legalities has an effect on him
Click to expand...

THE RUSSIA LIES WERE STARTED AND PUSHED LONG BEFORE THEN.

THERE SHOULD HAVE NEVER BEEN A "MUELLER PROBE"; THE ENTIRE THING WAS MADEUP LIES...


THE SEDITION-O-CRATS, THE LEFTOVER OBAMA INTELL ,AND THE FAKE NEWS LIED FOR THREE+ YEARS TO AMERICANS, SPREADING THE LIES THEY CREATED ABOUT "TRUMP-RUSSIA" TO TRY TO END TRUMP'S PRESIDENCY.


TREASON. CLEAR AND SIMPLE.

AND HILLARY IS IN IT UP TO HER NECK.




 
archives said:
So now all these conspiracies that have yet to be proven beyond Fox talk shows hurt Trump's chances to reset with Russia? And why would Trump need a reset with Russia when beginning on day one he bowed down to Putin, and is still doing it today
Click to expand...
damn when you are dense you are REALLY dense.
the fact of "Russian collusion" lie made Putin poisonous to even talk to by Trump - Trump wanted to try to improve Russian relations (as did Obama). But because of the lies being peddling by Clinton could not.
I hope you get this basic.

Durham "polls as an issue?"
Click to expand...
not at all.but your/Dem reliance on 1/6 as some kind of game changer is a laugher -especially since the FBI saif there was no plot - no Trump "gotcha"

And no, you believing the innuendos you are fed does not prove she "did it"
Click to expand...
not innuendo my friend. Straight from Mooks (Clinton campaign manger) mouth
 
archives said:
Mueller did not conclude that there was no collusion, Billy Barr concluded there was no conclusion, in fact, Mueller was under the idea that his report would be picked up by Congress for further review since he knew Barr believed in the Imperial Presidency bullshit
Click to expand...
incorrect. Weissmann concluded no proof of collusion - that is exoneration in our legal system
Weissman wanted Congress to look at Obstruction (even though Trump gave his minions full access)
- but collusion was cleared
 
archives said:
Here we go, says it all when we now have to drag in the Ukraine, deflect in another direction, are you going to tell us next that Zelensky is part of the Clinton campaign's effort to do in Trump
Click to expand...
Im putting it in context. FB bots is absolutely nothing in terms of "meddling" compared to what we do
 
remember Bill Clinton and "Clinton did it?" -that was over a lie about sex.
It was nothing and still got him impeached

"Hillary did it" is a vast LW conspiracy that used all the levers of power and conspired to hide it all
to take out a president.
Hillary is now disgraced
 
archives said:
wait a minute, "paying someone to dig up dirt" is different than "paying someone to dig up dirt and lying" exactly about what? Durham hasn't proven anyone lied to the FBI, and if he did, the lie would be that the guy didn't say he was also representing someone else, not about what was in the details

And if you actually paid attention to what was going on rather than what Fox tells you you would know that today the Clinton people Durham called to take the stand confirmed that the last entity they would take anything to was the FBI given the number Comey did on Clinton just a few months earlier
Click to expand...
dude, Mueller determined the details were lies years ago.......now we're getting to who lied and why.....and the FBI WAS the last entity they took the false info to.....
 
archives said:
Mueller did not conclude that there was no collusion
Click to expand...

except, he literally concluded there was no collusion......

Two impeachments were based on facts
Click to expand...

true.....both impeachments were based on the fact that the mindfucked lib'ruls could not stand the fact Trump got elected........next question?.....

And I could care less about Trump being convicted
Click to expand...

wise decision, given that you will never find any evidence of anything he could be convicted of.......doesn't it bother you that everything you think about DJT is actually based on the lies the Clinton campaign passed on to the FBI?......
 
PostmodernProphet said:
except, he literally concluded there was no collusion......



true.....both impeachments were based on the fact that the mindfucked lib'ruls could not stand the fact Trump got elected........next question?.....



wise decision, given that you will never find any evidence of anything he could be convicted of.......doesn't it bother you that everything you think about DJT is actually based on the lies the Clinton campaign passed on to the FBI?......
Click to expand...

To OVERTURN AN ELECTION NO LESS; INSURRECTION. TREASON.

Take your pick.
 
Grokmaster said:
Yeah, who would consider paying a foreign agent to makeup complete lies about one's political opponent with his Kremlin-linked buiddies, then lying to the FISA court about the paid for lies, to illegally spy upon said opponent, continuing INTO HIS PRESIDENCY, in an attempt to UNDO HIS ELECTION, a "scandal"?

It's only TREASON.
Click to expand...

Indeed.
 
Grokmaster said:
Bu-bu-but I thought she didn't know anything about it.


it's only TREASON, that's all.




Former Campaign Manager Testifies Clinton Personally Approved Spreading Trump-Russia Lie



The corrupt Clinton campaign is accused of paying operatives to dig up false information, which was then provided to the FBI in a false police report, that ultimately led to a warrant so the FBI could spy on the Trump campaign.

Former Clinton campaign manager Robby Mook testified that Hillary Clinton personally approved the dissemination of materials alleging a covert communications channel between the Trump Organization and Russia’s Alfa Bank to the media.

Clinton spread this lie despite campaign officials not being “totally confident” in whether the data was authentic.


Former FBI General Counsel James Baker also testified that the FBI investigated the data and found that “there was nothing there.” Clinton falsely alleged that Trump was connected to the Kremlin-linked bank.

Government prosecutor Andrew DeFillippis asked Mook about the campaign’s understanding of the Alfa Bank allegations against Trump.


“I don’t remember the substance of the conversation, but notionally, the discussion was, hey, we have this and we want to share it with a reporter,” Mook added.

When asked if Clinton approved “the dissemination” of the data to the media, Mook testified, “She agreed.”






https://www.analyzingamerica.org/2022/05/657343/?utm_source=mcotr


200.gif




heads-will-roll_o_957608.jpg
Click to expand...
They said nothing about in during Mueller investigation....strange.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top