It isn't, and she wasn't Secretary of State at the time and if paying some one to dig up dirt on a political opponent is a crime I think that you'll find half of all politicians guilty
Former Campaign Manager Testifies Clinton Personally Approved Trump-Russia Lie
- Thread starter Grokmaster
- Start date
It isn't, and she wasn't Secretary of State at the time and if paying some one to dig up dirt on a political opponent is a crime I think that you'll find half of all politicians guilty
No, if you are thinking the Muller Report, he documented over a hundred and twenty direct contacts between the Trump campaign and Russians. If you are referencing the two impeachments, they documented exactly what Trump did, and, the January 6th Committee at this point appears to have Trump directly connected to attempting to subvert the election of 2020
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
paying someone to dig up dirt is different from paying someone to make up dirt and lie about it to the FBI..........
Outstanding.
Oh, I see, you still believe they met to discuss adoptions in Russia, that Junior got all excited to meet with Russians to discuss adoptions, okie dokie
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
sorry.....your lies are old and no longer carry any weight.....the Mueller report, which was instigated on the basis of the lies Sussman told the FBI, concluded there was no collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russians......the two impeachments were based upon the fact Pelosi had a bee up her ass.......and so far you're hopes and dreams for a Trump conviction are about as likely as inflation going down under a Biden presidency......
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
nope......I believe they met to get dirt on Clinton and found out there wasn't any so they moved on.......something you cunts will never be able to do........
wait a minute, "paying someone to dig up dirt" is different than "paying someone to dig up dirt and lying" exactly about what? Durham hasn't proven anyone lied to the FBI, and if he did, the lie would be that the guy didn't say he was also representing someone else, not about what was in the details
And if you actually paid attention to what was going on rather than what Fox tells you you would know that today the Clinton people Durham called to take the stand confirmed that the last entity they would take anything to was the FBI given the number Comey did on Clinton just a few months earlier
Hillary Clinton has dirty hands.. maybe she'll finally STFU
What, so Trump's own hand pick individual at the FBI started the Mueller investigation cause of what some secondary figure in Clinton's campaign supposedly
told the FBI?
Mueller did not conclude that there was no collusion, Billy Barr concluded there was no conclusion, in fact, Mueller was under the idea that his report would be picked up by Congress for further review since he knew Barr believed in the Imperial Presidency bullshit
Two impeachments were based on facts, unfortunately, the world knew with the GOP Senate they weren't going beyond showing the facts, had nothing to do with Pelosi, she already had Trump's number embarrassing him over and over, which is why you hated her
And I could care less about Trump being convicted, history will be his judge, besides, with his army of attorneys and accountants, he'll be dead before any legalities has an effect on him
no the details were a lie as well. they had no evidence of alpha-bank connection
"tech #1 Joffe and Elias ( i think it was ) simply cooked it up
Clinton also passed the Steele dossier on, when warned it was fake
Then the Fake FISA'a at teh FBI,and the fake Special Counsel appointed despite Page sayng there was no evidence at the time of Russian collusion
the Clinton campaign, lied about everything.. wise up..The FBI was crooked as well
Clinton campaign DNC fined by FEC for lying about Steele dossier payments
https://nypost.com/2022/03/30/clint...-fec-for-lying-about-steele-dossier-payments/
Right, and Manford sharing polling data with Russians was just a coincidence
At Brookings, Danchenko worked with Fiona Hill, later a member of President Trump’s National Security Council (and a key witness in the first Trump impeachment over the unrelated Ukraine controversy). It was through Hill that Danchenko became acquainted with Steele, who ran a London-based intelligence firm upon leaving MI-6, the British spy service.
Durham’s indictment alleges that Danchenko lied about two major points.
John DurhamJohn DurhamU.S. Department of Justice via AP, File
First, he fabricated the claim that the president of the Russian-American Chamber of Commerce informed him that, during the 2016 presidential campaign, Trump was involved in a well-developed “conspiracy of cooperation” with the regime of Russian President Vladimir Putin. In reality, the indictment says, this conversation never happened.
Danchenko is also alleged to have concealed that one of his sources for the information he provided to Steele was a longtime Democratic Party operative who was close to the Clintons — having worked on both of Bill Clinton’s successful presidential campaigns and Hillary Clinton’s unsuccessful 2008 presidential campaign. This source was revealed on Thursday to be Chuck Dolan, a public relations executive who had Russian contacts, and referred to as “PR Executive-1” in the indictment.
Durham theorizes that the Trump-Russia collusion narrative was a political attack manufactured by the Clinton campaign. Relying on Danchenko, Steele compiled the reports for Glenn Simpson, co-founder of intelligence firm Fusion-GPS, which specializes in digging up political dirt. Fusion-GPS was retained for the Trump project by Perkins-Coie, the Clinton campaign’s law firm.
Durham’s charging instruments suggest that the Clinton campaign used its agents to peddle the Trump-Russia rumors to the government and the media, then used the fact that Trump was being investigated as part of its campaign messaging.
https://nypost.com/2021/11/04/arres...was-political-dirty-trick-by-hillary-clinton/
Durham’s indictment alleges that Danchenko lied about two major points.
John DurhamJohn DurhamU.S. Department of Justice via AP, File
First, he fabricated the claim that the president of the Russian-American Chamber of Commerce informed him that, during the 2016 presidential campaign, Trump was involved in a well-developed “conspiracy of cooperation” with the regime of Russian President Vladimir Putin. In reality, the indictment says, this conversation never happened.
Danchenko is also alleged to have concealed that one of his sources for the information he provided to Steele was a longtime Democratic Party operative who was close to the Clintons — having worked on both of Bill Clinton’s successful presidential campaigns and Hillary Clinton’s unsuccessful 2008 presidential campaign. This source was revealed on Thursday to be Chuck Dolan, a public relations executive who had Russian contacts, and referred to as “PR Executive-1” in the indictment.
Durham theorizes that the Trump-Russia collusion narrative was a political attack manufactured by the Clinton campaign. Relying on Danchenko, Steele compiled the reports for Glenn Simpson, co-founder of intelligence firm Fusion-GPS, which specializes in digging up political dirt. Fusion-GPS was retained for the Trump project by Perkins-Coie, the Clinton campaign’s law firm.
Durham’s charging instruments suggest that the Clinton campaign used its agents to peddle the Trump-Russia rumors to the government and the media, then used the fact that Trump was being investigated as part of its campaign messaging.
https://nypost.com/2021/11/04/arres...was-political-dirty-trick-by-hillary-clinton/
No, you people are so gullible, the whole Durham charade, after three years, is only in the news now to serve as a counterweight in anticipation of the January 6th's report due out in this summer, to give the right wing media a whataboutism and material for innuendo, it has no other reason, did you actually think America gives a rat's ass about events of six years ago, especially when they are nothing more than more conspiracies and unproven plots
Put down the Kool Aid and get out more
it wasnt the Russians. Kilimnik was trained in Russia but was working for Ukraine RW groups.
I think it was a personal business deal - what good does pollng data do the Russians?
Enough already, all you are doing is regurgitating conspiracies and scenarios none of which have been proven beyond innuendo and are only echoed by Murdoch to sell, make money, we have been listening to the same Clinton bullshit for decades now, put down the Kool Aid and move on
yu are spiningg your ass off this is meaningless
It was the Mother of all Dirty tricks, poisoned US/Russian relations and did not allow Trump
to do a Russian reset as Obama did.
Perhaps if Trump had made a deal with Putin for Crimean recognition in return for getting out of Donbas..
(spitballing)
Trump couldn't even TALK to Putin. Clinton poisoned that well
Nobody cares about 1/6. It doesnt even poll as as issue, and no this isn't some master time plan
Durham has been working on this for a long time -COVID slowed it up
Time you give it up and understand
Clinton is a vile beast with unbounded ambition she would pull crap like this, damn the consequences.
Now we know she personally "did it"
Provided Russian hackers who to target via algorithms to reinforce the same conspiracies you swallowed to undecided voters, and you saying it was a "personal business deal" is really kind of hilarious
LMAO you aren't even trying.. I told YOU this was ALL BULLSHIT from day 1
it fucked up diplomatic relations, made Trump look like a traitor, meaning he had a difficult time getting personnel
and caused attempts to undermine a duly elected POTUS