GOP talking point: if you oppose SCOTUS decision, you're against democracy

[Into the Night]

You are just unable to locate it. It is like abortion which is protected by the right to privacy--clearly there although no one can find it.

RQAA. You don't get to speak for everyone. You only get to speak for you. Omniscience fallacy. You are not everyone.

 

[Into the Night]

The federal courts have had the right to interpret the Constitution since Marbury v. Madison. Your disagreement does ot mean it is not law recognized by all the courts.

Claiming the Constitution gives Congress the power to regulate immigration is an example of a court interpretation.

No court has the authority to interpret the Constitution. No court has authority to change the Constitution, not even by attempting to usurp it. Marbury v Madison does NOT give the court any additional power or authority. False authority fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

Nope. Immigration laws and naturalization laws are different.

No, they aren't.

The Naturalization Law of 1790 contained no regulation of immigration; nor did the Naturalization Law of 1795. The first federal immigration laws were not passed until the 1880s.

Semantics fallacies.

Some states passed immigration laws but the SC ruled that was a federal power.

It is.

 

[Into the Night]

It is not semantics when two terms have completely different meanings and intents.

Semantics fallacy.

The military is allowed certain specified function in assisting immigration and customs. Stopping "invasions" is not one of these.

It is. Semantics fallacies.

 

[Into the Night]

Nope.

Yup. Immigration is part of naturalization.

 

[Into the Night]

Welcome to the insanity of Into the Night.

Psychoquackery. No argument presented.

 

[Into the Night]

Into the Night/Smarter than You/ and gfm7175

Psychoquackery. Insult fallacies. No argument presented.

 

[AProudLefty]

Mockery. Denial of logic. Inversion fallacy.

Argument of the stone fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

Argument of the stone fallacy.

Mockery. Fallacy fallacy.

 

[AProudLefty]

Mockery. Fallacy fallacy.

Argument of the stone fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

Argument of the stone fallacy.

Mockery. Fallacy fallacy.

 

[AProudLefty]

Mockery. Fallacy fallacy.

Mockery. Argument of the stone fallacy.

 

[Sirthinksalot]

Because he refused to allow PRESIDENT Obama appoint a SCOTUS member



That was unconstitutional

Obama was able to APPOINT Merrick Garland, the turtle did nothing to stop him from APPOINTING Garland. The turtle did not allow him to be CONFIRMED. Idiot.

 

[Flash]

Psychoquackery. Insult fallacies. No argument presented.

I think everybody understand what is being said with this post. No argument needed since we have seen the evidence in many different posts.

 

[Flash]

Yup. Immigration is part of naturalization.

Yet, you cannot find any connection. It certainly is not in the Constitution--must be legislating from the bench to invent powers we want government to exercise.

 

[Flash]

Semantics fallacy.

It is. Semantics fallacies.

Invaders are not apprehended by immigration officials. They are prisoners of war, not asylum/refugee seekers.

 

[Flash]

RQAA. You don't get to speak for everyone. You only get to speak for you. Omniscience fallacy. You are not everyone.

Endless repetition of the same points.

 

[Taichiliberal]

Mockery. Argument of the stone fallacy.

Now, now .... it's not nice to tease the mentally infirm.

 

[Taichiliberal]

Yet, you cannot find any connection. It certainly is not in the Constitution--must be legislating from the bench to invent powers we want government to exercise.

And he never will....nor will he admit to such. Essentially, he'll just squawk the SOS of nonsensical mantras until doomsday. I suspect he's one brick shy of a load, which is why I have him on permanent ignore.

 

[AProudLefty]

Now, now .... it's not nice to tease the mentally infirm.

But but but I am also mentally ill????