GOP talking point: if you oppose SCOTUS decision, you're against democracy

Taichiliberal said:
Spare us all that tired lie of "murdering babies", as any doctor will tell you a developing pregnancy is premature under 37 weeks. Any abortion beyond that is illegal by law, unless it's determined that the mother's life is at risk in giving birth.

Now, think....if my previous proposal was to actually become law, then what you stating (which is exaggerated to some degree) would not be an issue, if not a rarity.

It seems that when the shoe is on the other foot, Christo-fascist flunkies make all types of excuses, but have no problem being the Iron Heel to women. Pathetic, but not unexpected.
Click to expand...

Christianity is not fascism.
 
Flash said:
We both know that is BS.
Click to expand...
You don't get to speak for anyone else. You only get to speak for you. Omniscience fallacy.
Flash said:
You want Congress to control immigration (which I do also) but there is no such power in the Constitution
Click to expand...
There is.
Flash said:
so you try to invent such a power by claiming national defense is protecting us from an "invasion" of immigrants.
Click to expand...
It IS an invasion.
Flash said:
At least you have dropped the claim that immigration is included under naturalization.
Click to expand...
It is.
Flash said:
Sometimes court decisions interpreting the Constitution
Click to expand...
No court has authority to interpret the Constitution.
Flash said:
provide needed powers although no text contains that power.
Click to expand...
No court has authority to change the Constitution.
 
gemini104104 said:
The GOP is projecting the fact that it is at war against Democracy
Click to expand...
There is no democracy. The United States was never a democracy.
gemini104104 said:
and defiling SCOTUS with unconstitutionally hacked in repuke approved and seditious so-called justices,
Click to expand...
A justice on the Supreme Court is quite constitutional.
gemini104104 said:
and in 2016 conspiring with foreign enemies to destroy the legitimacy of the 2016 election
Click to expand...
You are describing Democrats. They weren't successful.
gemini104104 said:
in a tRump criminal of the sewer with foreign and domestic enemy's favor that came with a curse against humanity.
Click to expand...
You are describing Biden.
 
Into the Night said:
No court has authority to interpret the Constitution.

No court has authority to change the Constitution.
Click to expand...

The federal courts have had the right to interpret the Constitution since Marbury v. Madison. Your disagreement does ot mean it is not law recognized by all the courts.

Claiming the Constitution gives Congress the power to regulate immigration is an example of a court interpretation.
 
Into the Night said:
Which includes the immigration laws.
Click to expand...

Nope. Immigration laws and naturalization laws are different. The Naturalization Law of 1790 contained no regulation of immigration; nor did the Naturalization Law of 1795. The first federal immigration laws were not passed until the 1880s. Some states passed immigration laws but the SC ruled that was a federal power.
 
Flash said:
It is not semantics when two terms have completely different meanings and intents. The military is allowed certain specified function in assisting immigration and customs. Stopping "invasions" is not one of these.
Click to expand...

Welcome to the insanity of Into the Night.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top