GOP talking point: if you oppose SCOTUS decision, you're against democracy

[evince]

Incest is voluntary, I'd be willing to bend on statutory rape and rape which only accounts for 1.5% of abortions, but the Democrats won't even support bans on late term abortions they want abortions on demand right up until the point of birth.

Prove it


A brother fucking his little sister is voluntary?


Prove that with some facts

 

[evince]

Men are already under legal obligation to financially support any child they sire and they get no say whatsoever regarding abortion or adoption. Women can use birth control just like men and should be held responsible for the consequences of their actions just like men, murdering babies is not birth control.

That is not what Americans decided huh


They still don’t agree with you


Why should everyone do what YOU want?

 

[Into the Night]

Incest is voluntary, I'd be willing to bend on statutory rape and rape which only accounts for 1.5% of abortions, but the Democrats won't even support bans on late term abortions they want abortions on demand right up until the point of birth.

Even PAST the point of birth.

 

[Into the Night]

Because he refused to allow PRESIDENT Obama appoint a SCOTUS member



That was unconstitutional

Completely constitutional. The President has no authority to appoint a SCOTUS member. See Articles I, II and III of the Constitution of the United States.

 

[Into the Night]

No sperm

No pregnancy


Let’s control sperm instead of eggs

Why control either??

 

[Into the Night]

No egg becomes a baby without sperm

So?

Women RARELY RAPE anyone

It actually happens fairly often.

Men are the ones who do far more raping

So?

Men should not be allowed to produce sperm for any other reason than to have an agreed upon child with a willing woman

Not practical or legal.

 

[Into the Night]

Prove it


A brother fucking his little sister is voluntary?


Prove that with some facts

Yes.
Learn what 'fact' means. It does not mean 'proof'.

 

[Melchizedek = Michael]

but rape and incest are voluntary actions of men??????

Depends! Men get raped too.

 

[Melchizedek = Michael]

You want women to be the one to say no

Then you need to accept No


The way you can prove how moral and responsible you men are?



Step up and get snipped

Don’t force all the responsibility on Just one gender

Out dated ,now that "gender" is a choice! Depending on what gender you intensify as.

 

[Taichiliberal]

Quote

Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
Rape and incest are not voluntary actions on the part of the woman. That's a major part of the "pro-life" agenda at this point. That's fucking sick.

Incest is voluntary, I'd be willing to bend on statutory rape and rape which only accounts for 1.5% of abortions, but the Democrats won't even support bans on late term abortions they want abortions on demand right up until the point of birth.

Holy Mother of God! YOU just stated that incest is voluntary!

Who told you this? The creeps who did it to their own child? What they tell you, that she knew what was going on and wanted it? So any pedophile is okay by you, right?

Man, you are one disgusting individual who would even venture this bilge just to support some twisted Christo-fascist agenda. You must really have issues with women. My previous assessment of folk like you stands, and you just validated it.

 

[Taichiliberal]

Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
Since you need two people involved for a woman to get pregnant, why not have men have mandatory vasectomies when they hit 17 or 18 until their financially and emotionally ready to support a kid(s)? Vasectomies are reversible.

Men are already under legal obligation to financially support any child they sire and they get no say whatsoever regarding abortion or adoption. Women can use birth control just like men and should be held responsible for the consequences of their actions just like men, murdering babies is not birth control.

Spare us all that tired lie of "murdering babies", as any doctor will tell you a developing pregnancy is premature under 37 weeks. Any abortion beyond that is illegal by law, unless it's determined that the mother's life is at risk in giving birth.

Now, think....if my previous proposal was to actually become law, then what you stating (which is exaggerated to some degree) would not be an issue, if not a rarity.

It seems that when the shoe is on the other foot, Christo-fascist flunkies make all types of excuses, but have no problem being the Iron Heel to women. Pathetic, but not unexpected.

 

[Flash]

The Supreme Court has NO authority to change the Constitution.

Does that mean it has no power to create a power of Congress to regulate immigration although there is no such power in the Constitution?

 

[Flash]

Immigration is invasion, dumbass.

We both know that is BS. You want Congress to control immigration (which I do also) but there is no such power in the Constitution so you try to invent such a power by claiming national defense is protecting us from an "invasion" of immigrants. At least you have dropped the claim that immigration is included under naturalization.

Sometimes court decisions interpreting the Constitution provide needed powers although no text contains that power.

 

[Flash]

Immigration is part of naturalization, dumbass.

Where does the Constitution say that? Certainly it is not in Article I or other passages you cited. Are you telling us the government has some powers not contained in the Constitution?

 

[Flash]

Illegal immigration (e.g. migrant caravans) IS invasion, dude.

The Federal Government under the installed Biden Regime are failing to do their Article IV Section 4 constitutional duty to protect the States from invasion. They are instead, for the most part, leaving the individual States to fend for themselves against this invasion meanwhile sending $40+ billion to subsidize the Ukrainian government and to continue feeding the war machine that they stoked up over there.

It is not illegal when they enter the country seeking asylum or refugee status because that is provided by law. What is the purpose of an "invasion"?

 

[Flash]

How does one become naturalized (as opposed to born) in the United States?

By following the naturalization laws set by Congress.

 

[Flash]

they USURPED that power, they weren't given that power. We the people wrote the Constitution and are, therefore, the final arbiter on what it means.

The people have obviously ceded that power to the Supreme Court. Just like the president has usurped the power to issue executive orders, send troops into war, impose tariffs.....

 

[gemini104104]

Because, hey - now the VOTERS get to decide if a woman has rights nor not. Why would anyone be opposed to that? Don't you trust voters to do the right thing?

I've already heard it a half dozen times in the past day. If you oppose overturning a 50+ year old precedent and what has been the law of the land for a generation, you're against democracy. You're against Americans.

They really play us all for fools.

The GOP is projecting the fact that it is at war against Democracy and defiling SCOTUS with unconstitutionally hacked in repuke approved and seditious so-called justices, and in 2016 conspiring with foreign enemies to destroy the legitimacy of the 2016 election in a tRump criminal of the sewer with foreign and domestic enemy's favor that came with a curse against humanity.

 

[gfm7175]

It is not illegal when they enter the country seeking asylum or refugee status because that is provided by law. What is the purpose of an "invasion"?

It is illegal for aliens to enter the country without first undergoing naturalization, which is the situation that is being discussed here. A word to describe such a situation is 'invasion'. Quit pivoting.

 

[gfm7175]

By following the naturalization laws set by Congress.

Is this something that someone who was born inside the States would do, or is this something that someone who was born outside the States would do?