GOP talking point: if you oppose SCOTUS decision, you're against democracy

Flash said:
Naturalization and immigration are not the same thing as ruled by the Supreme Court and recognized by Congress in passing separate laws dealing with the two topics.

There is no text in the Constitution regarding immigration. There are many powers the courts have granted the federal government that have no constitutional basis or text to support them--immigration is one.

You are confusing naturalization and immigration. confusion fallacy.
Click to expand...

The Supreme Court has NO authority to change the Constitution.
 
gemini104104 said:
The un-American GQP talking point is to counsel in the sewer to conspire more ways to wage war on Democracy, society and anything else of a civilized nature on Earth, with tRump, in particular, as their head leader among the trash and stench of the sewer of sub-human damnation and a moral failure on humanity too.
Click to expand...

The United States was not organized as a democracy. It never was a democracy.
 
Taichiliberal said:
CHOICE is democracy. Laws are to maintain fairness, protect the weak, prevent chicanery and corruption, GIVE THE PEOPLE CHOICE AS TO WHERE TO LIVE, TO OWN OR NOT OWN A GUN, TO ATTEND WHATEVER SCHOOL THEY WANT, TO WORSHIP ANY GOD THEY WANT. Laws guarantee decent food, water, medical attention (or at least they should). Laws guarantee privacy (or at least they should).

Telling a woman she has to have a child conceived by rape or incest is not democracy....it is either theocracy or monarchy or autocracy.
Click to expand...

Choice is choice. You are free to choose. You are NOT free of the consequences of that choice.
The United States was never a democracy. It was never organized as a democracy.
 
Taichiliberal said:
This means that the "law" exists within the wording of the Constitution. But hey, until it's a Congress drafted "law", let's repeal it along with every blessed SCOTUS decision that is not base solely and directly on Congress passed law.

Be careful what you wish for.
Click to expand...

The Supreme Court has no authority to change the Constitution or write law.
 
Taichiliberal said:
Rape and incest are not voluntary actions on the part of the woman. That's a major part of the "pro-life" agenda at this point. That's fucking sick.
Click to expand...

Abortions for convenience is the issue here. You cannot pivot away from that and get away with it. Abortion for convenience is murder.
Incest is voluntary.
 
Taichiliberal said:
Since you need two people involved for a woman to get pregnant, why not have men have mandatory vasectomies when they hit 17 or 18 until their financially and emotionally ready to support a kid(s)? Vasectomies are reversible.
Click to expand...

Not always. You cannot convict someone for what they MIGHT do. Only for what they HAVE done.
Discard of the Constitution of the United States.
 
Defender of Honor said:
We're at war with ourselves!
Click to expand...


Seven out of 198 nations allow elective abortions after 20 weeks of pregnancy - Canada, China, Netherlands, North Korea, Singapore, the United States and Vietnam.

Most of America does not actually agree with that late of an elective abortion
 
Last edited:
Taichiliberal said:
Rape and incest are not voluntary actions on the part of the woman. That's a major part of the "pro-life" agenda at this point. That's fucking sick.
Click to expand...
Rape is not voluntary, but incest IS.

Attempt to divert away from 'abortions for convenience', which is the issue here. You condone the murder of innocent living humans. That's fucking sick.
 
Taichiliberal said:
Since you need two people involved for a woman to get pregnant, why not have men have mandatory vasectomies when they hit 17 or 18 until their financially and emotionally ready to support a kid(s)? Vasectomies are reversible.
Click to expand...

Men are already under legal obligation to financially support any child they sire and they get no say whatsoever regarding abortion or adoption. Women can use birth control just like men and should be held responsible for the consequences of their actions just like men, murdering babies is not birth control.
 
Taichiliberal said:
Rape and incest are not voluntary actions on the part of the woman. That's a major part of the "pro-life" agenda at this point. That's fucking sick.
Click to expand...

Incest is voluntary, I'd be willing to bend on statutory rape and rape which only accounts for 1.5% of abortions, but the Democrats won't even support bans on late term abortions they want abortions on demand right up until the point of birth.
 
Taichiliberal said:
Since you need two people involved for a woman to get pregnant, why not have men have mandatory vasectomies when they hit 17 or 18 until their financially and emotionally ready to support a kid(s)? Vasectomies are reversible.
Click to expand...

have you always been misogynistic? why are you implying that women are incapable of saying no, or using contraceptives, or accepting responsibility for not doing either?
 
No egg becomes a baby without sperm



Women RARELY RAPE anyone


Men are the ones who do far more raping

Men should not be allowed to produce sperm for any other reason than to have an agreed upon child with a willing woman
 
You want women to be the one to say no

Then you need to accept No


The way you can prove how moral and responsible you men are?



Step up and get snipped

Don’t force all the responsibility on Just one gender
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top