White Libs: Are all 1st world countries Caucasian or Asian?

Bigdog said:
Which is why you have to put your big boy pants on and learn to use big words, big sciencey words.
Click to expand...

Caucasian, Mongoloid, and Negroid are not not words used by modern science. At best they would be called obsolete.
 
Bigdog said:
According to typical white lib, WALT, they are.

Walt posted:
"Name all the First World nations? Well, I will give an incomplete list:

Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Luxembourg, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Portugal, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom"
Click to expand...

bs. That should be so-called white lib ignoramuses if you completely believe this load of a false sense of superiority complex and delusional fiction you crapped out on here at playing a idiot for a idiot to fall for your misconstrued crap.

The U.S., European Union and China are the greatest investors in Africa:

https://www.reuters.com/world/africa/eu-earmarks-150-billion-euros-investment-africa-2022-02-10/

DAKAR, Feb 10 (Reuters) - The European Union has earmarked over 150 billion euros ($170 billion) for investments in Africa under a global fund launched to offer an alternative to Chinese money, the European Commission said on Thursday.

China is still the largest investor in Africa over the last 10 years.
The US is the second-largest investor in Africa, followed by France in third place.
https://africa.businessinsider.com/...is still the largest,by France in third place.

Africa’s Fabulous Mineral Wealth that isn’t ALL there
Africa is the richest continent in the world, in terms of its natural and mineral resources…Africa supplies up to 31 percent of the world’s demand for bauxite, cobalt, gold, manganese, phosphate and uranium.
https://africanarguments.org/2012/0..., in terms,, manganese, phosphate and uranium.

The Emerging Markets Of Africa
The global economic meltdown has highlighted Africa’s status as the next big market poised for unprecedented growth in the the coming years...
Which countries are emerging markets in Africa?
The growth in sub-Saharan Africa can also be gauged by the fact that the IMF upgraded many countries in the region – Botswana, Ghana, Kenya, Mozambique, Nigeria, Tanzania, Uganda and Zambia – to the rank of "emerging markets."
https://www.africa-business.com/features/africa-emerging-business.html

List of African-American inventors and scientists
This list of African Americans inventors and scientists documents many of the African-Americans who have invented a multitude of items or made discoveries in the course of their lives. These have ranged from practical everyday devices to applications and scientific discoveries in diverse fields, including physics, biology, math, and medicine.

African-Americans have been the victims of oppression, discrimination and persecution throughout American history, with an impact on African-American innovation. A 2014 study by economist Lisa D. Cook linked violence towards African-Americans and lack of legal protections over the period 1870–1940 to lower innovation.[1] Despite this, many black innovators have been responsible for a large number of major inventions.

Among the earliest was George Washington Carver, whose reputation was based on his research into and promotion of alternative crops to cotton, which aided in nutrition for farm families. He wanted poor farmers to grow alternative crops both as a source of their own food and as a source of other products to improve their way of life. The most popular of his 44 practical bulletins for farmers contained 105 food recipes using peanuts.[2] He also developed and promoted about 100 products made from peanuts that were useful for the house and farm. He received numerous honors for his work, including the Spingarn Medal of the NAACP.

A later renowned scientist was Percy Lavon Julian, a research chemist and a pioneer in the chemical synthesis of medicinal drugs from plants. He was the first to synthesize the natural product physostigmine, and a pioneer in the industrial large-scale chemical synthesis of the human hormones, steroids, progesterone, and testosterone, from plant sterols such as stigmasterol and sitosterol. His work would lay the foundation for the steroid drug industry's production of cortisone, other corticosteroids, and birth control pills.[3]

A contemporary example of a modern-day inventor is Lonnie George Johnson, an engineer. Johnson invented the Super Soaker water gun, which was the top-selling toy in the United States from 1991 to 1992. In 1980 Johnson formed his own law firm and licensed the Super Soaker water gun to Larami Corporation. Two years later, the Super Soaker generated over $200 million in retail sales and became the best selling toy in America. Larami Corporation was eventually purchased by Hasbro, the second largest toy manufacturer in the world. Over the years, Super Soaker sales have totaled close to one billion dollars. Johnson reinvested a majority of his earnings from the Super Soaker into research and development for his energy technology companies – "It's who I am, it's what I do."[4] As of 2019, Johnson holds over 120 patents, with more pending, and is the author of several publications on spacecraft power systems."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_African-American_inventors_and_scientists
 
Last edited:
Walt said:
I guess it all depends on how you define the term. If you include all Europeans, Middle Easterners, South Asians, and Latin Americans origins, you start looking at a possible bare majority. If you are willing to go back a few thousand years, and you have a solid majority.

But again, Caucasian is a problematic term, which does not have a good definition. It is hard to get solid numbers out of something that does not have a good definition.
Click to expand...

Apparently, archaeology, biology and anthropology are sciences that you have zero interest in. Do you like any of the sciences at all?

While there is not a super accurate count, current very rough estimates worldwide are ...

60% Mongoloid
20% Caucasian
20% Negroid
 
gemini104104 said:
bs. That should be so-called white lib ignoramuses
Click to expand...

America is the only majority white nation to elect a Black president, send Black astronauts into space, and give Blacks the right to legally own firearms.

You also forgot to mention Hannibal or the Kushites.

Fucking virtual signaling hypocrite white libs. :palm:
 
Bigdog said:
Apparently, archaeology, biology and anthropology are sciences that you have zero interest in. Do you like any of the sciences at all?
Click to expand...

None of the current sciences use Mongoloid, Caucasian, or Negroid, because the terms simply do not work.


Bigdog said:
While there is not a super accurate count, current very rough estimates worldwide are ...
60% Mongoloid
20% Caucasian
20% Negroid
Click to expand...

South Asians cannot logically be called either Mongoloid or Negroid, so that leaves Caucasian. They alone make up 25% of the world's population. The Americas have another 13.2%, with Europe having 9.8%. North Africa and the West Africa is not Negroid, mostly Arabic, and makes up 3.6% and 3.1%. That is a total of 54.7%, and we have not even touched some of the smaller regions. You may say there are some East Asians in all those regions, but surprising few. India is not known for its Chinese immigrants. In much of the world, if you say someone is Asian, they assume South Asian.

But lets look at the 60% of the world that you claim is of East Asian origin. East Asian's alone make up 22% of the population, that is a lot, but no where close to 60%. In fact, it is a smaller number than from South Asia (25%).

But there are also Southeast Asians, most could be generally defined as Mongoloid, but they only add 8.6%. You have only hit 30.6%, a good long distance from 60%. Even if you assume the entire population of Europe and North America has been replaced by Chinese people, you still are only at 48%. We know that has not happened, because Chinese are still a small minority on both continents, but even with that, we cannot get to half of humanity.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_continents_and_continental_subregions_by_population
 
Bigdog said:
Apparently, archaeology, biology and anthropology are sciences that you have zero interest in. Do you like any of the sciences at all?

While there is not a super accurate count, current very rough estimates worldwide are ...

60% Mongoloid
20% Caucasian
20% Negroid
Click to expand...

Consider the following details and facts as in the reality of it all:

African American Workers Built America

Black labor has been foundational to the growth of America and our economy. Enslaved people built the country’s early infrastructure and produced lucrative commodities such as cotton and tobacco. After emancipation, African American labor was crucial in industry, agriculture, and service. Yet the federal Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), which was established in 1884, only started gathering consistent data on African American workers in 1972. For nearly a century, African American workers did not appear even as data points let alone in meaningful policies or labor legislation.

This Black History Month, we celebrate Black workers, their achievements, and their dedication to work (a trait often attributed to white workers). We also must consider the steep challenges and structural inequities Black workers continue to face. Understanding that history contextualizes today’s fight to improve and expand African Americans’ access to higher paying jobs and economic success.

Black workers have endured a long history of discrimination, including restrictions from unions. Companies used Black workers as strike breakers to misdirect white workers’ anger and frustration. New Deal programs excluded Black agricultural and domestic workers. And 1930s “progressive” public benefits legislation such as the Social Security Act was actually pro-white legislation that neglects Black workers, especially women.

Historically, African Americans—especially women—have propped up the labor market, despite discrimination and hostility. As far back as 1870, 50 percent of Black women were in the labor force compared to just 16.5 percent of white women. Therefore, the famous wave of women entering the workforce in the 1970s applied only to white women. Black women who’ve always worked have been invisible to policymakers.

Black workers’ high labor force participation has propelled American economic growth, often at extremely low pay. As the 1619 Project documents, Black slaves enduring brutal conditions for two centuries in Southern plantation and Northern industries to build the booming American economy. In the early 1900s, over one million African Americans joined the “Great Migration” to fill jobs in the steel, automobile, shipbuilding, and other heavy industries. W.E.B. DuBois described this pivotal moment of American capitalism: The giant forces of water and of steam were harnessed to do the world’s work, and the black workers of America bent at the bottom of a growing pyramid of commerce and industry. White employers underpaid and segregated Black workers, subjecting them to discrimination and hostility. We must recognize their labor—whether caring for children or turning out machines in a factory—as important parts of America’s growth."

https://www.clasp.org/blog/african-american-workers-built-america/
 
Walt said:
None of the current sciences use Mongoloid, Caucasian, or Negroid, because the terms simply do not work.




South Asians cannot logically be called either Mongoloid or Negroid, so that leaves Caucasian. They alone make up 25% of the world's population. The Americas have another 13.2%, with Europe having 9.8%. North Africa and the West Africa is not Negroid, mostly Arabic, and makes up 3.6% and 3.1%. That is a total of 54.7%, and we have not even touched some of the smaller regions. You may say there are some East Asians in all those regions, but surprising few. India is not known for its Chinese immigrants. In much of the world, if you say someone is Asian, they assume South Asian.

But lets look at the 60% of the world that you claim is of East Asian origin. East Asian's alone make up 22% of the population, that is a lot, but no where close to 60%. In fact, it is a smaller number than from South Asia (25%).

But there are also Southeast Asians, most could be generally defined as Mongoloid, but they only add 8.6%. You have only hit 30.6%, a good long distance from 60%. Even if you assume the entire population of Europe and North America has been replaced by Chinese people, you still are only at 48%. We know that has not happened, because Chinese are still a small minority on both continents, but even with that, we cannot get to half of humanity.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_continents_and_continental_subregions_by_population
Click to expand...

According to big gov't bureaucrats, the official definition is ...

Asian – A person having origins in any of the original peoples of the Far East, Southeast Asia, or the Indian subcontinent including, for example, Cambodia, China, India, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Pakistan, the Philippine Islands, Thailand, and Vietnam.

https://www.census.gov/topics/population/race/about.html

The slanted eyes you talked about is not a requirement.

And from your own link ...

World population by continent, 2018

Asia (59.8%)
Africa (16.7%)
Europe (9.8%)
North America (7.6%)
South America (5.6%)
Oceania (0.5%)
 
Walt said:
So now you are claiming that being "Mongoloid" is not genetic, but merely about passing through Asia. OK, well that has all your theories fall apart.
Click to expand...

Just because some Asians lack the protective eyelids that evolve on windy open plains, doesn't mean they are Not all more closely related to each other than they are to other races.. :palm:
 
Last edited:
Bigdog said:
Just because some Asians lack the protective eyelids that evolve on windy open plains, doesn't mean they are Not all more closely related to each other than they are to other races.. :palm:
Click to expand...

The Caucuses are part of Asia, so under your theory Caucasians would be Mongoloids.

In the real world, Indians are not closely related to Chinese, and in fact are closer in relations to Europeans.
 
Walt said:
The Caucuses are part of Asia, so under your theory Caucasians would be Mongoloids.

In the real world, Indians are not closely related to Chinese, and in fact are closer in relations to Europeans.
Click to expand...

Ummm ... China is adjacent to India.

Here, let me show you ...

s-l1600.jpg
 
Walt said:
There are these huge mountains in-between, much like there are a desert and small sea in-between Sub-Sahara Africa and Europe.
Click to expand...

So how did primitive man ever get into China, Cracka Lib? :palm:

The Rockies are TWICE as long and Twice as wide as the Himalayas and it didn't stop Asians from migrating all over America.

Hannibal took a primitive army across the Alps.

The Kushites ruled Egypt for a 100 years. How could they possibly have gotten there, oh my! Cracka Lib.

Homo Sapiens originated in Africa. So everyone was negroid, there were no whites or Asians at all at the time. :palm:

Primitive tribes were nomads, experts at walking, at crossing mountains, deserts, and jungles.

And of course, cracka libs believe all negroid tribes in Africa look alike. :palm:
 
Walt said:
There are these huge mountains in-between, much like there are a desert and small sea in-between Sub-Sahara Africa and Europe.
Click to expand...

Cracka lib fantasyland is not reality. :palm: These things did not stop prehistoric peoples.
 
Last edited:
The premise is basically true. The temperate climate zone is where most of the 1st world exists.
We'll be the exception soon enough, the way we're going.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top