White Libs: Are all 1st world countries Caucasian or Asian?

Bigdog said:
Ask the gov't.

And who divided Caucasians into Hispanic Whites and Non Hispanic Whites? You're an expert on race so you should be able to answer, right?
Click to expand...

Wrong. But I do know that Hispanic is a language not a race. For example, is someone who's Black and born in Brazil "Hispanic?" How about someone of Japanese origin living in Peru like this guy...

alberto-fujimori-3.jpg


He was born in Peru, his name is Alberto Fujimori, former President of Peru, he speaks Spanish as his native language. Is he "Hispanic?"

So, whoever came up with "Hispanic" as a racial minority was a fucking retard. Hell, by the standard set, all one has to have is ancestors that lived in a "Hispanic" nation to be Hispanic. My own ancestors on my mother's side immigrated from Europe to Texas when it was part of Mexico. That makes them Mexican citizens, which they initially were--until they revolted and formed the Republic of Texas as a separate nation...
 
archives said:
You now telling us Trump is a "Liberal?"

"Trump calls US third world country"

https://economictimes.indiatimes.co...ofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst

https://economictimes.indiatimes.co...ofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst
Click to expand...

No, he's a successful politician and real estate developer that doesn't realize the hole he fell into here created by liberals.

There is only one Earth. There is no 1st, 2nd, or 3rd world countries. Just one Earth, and all nations are upon it.
 
Bigdog said:
I don't know there is an agreed upon definition for first world.

"Arab immigrants from modern-day Syria and Lebanon, who were considered Asian, successfully fought to be classified as white and thus eligible for citizenship. That classification was cemented in the late 1970s when the Office of Management and Budget listed all Middle Easterners as white."Mar 28, 2019

https://www.latimes.com › projects › la-me-census-mid..
Click to expand...

The terms are used to divide and insult.
 
Walt said:
The "No True Scotsman" argument. Any country that is successful is apparently Caucasian, and any that is a failure is not. It is amazing how the genetics of a country can change in a few years.
Click to expand...

Define 'successful'.
If a nation exists, it's successful. It exists.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Wrong. But I do know that Hispanic is a language not a race. For example, is someone who's Black and born in Brazil "Hispanic?" How about someone of Japanese origin living in Peru like this guy...

alberto-fujimori-3.jpg


He was born in Peru, his name is Alberto Fujimori, former President of Peru, he speaks Spanish as his native language. Is he "Hispanic?"

So, whoever came up with "Hispanic" as a racial minority was a fucking retard. Hell, by the standard set, all one has to have is ancestors that lived in a "Hispanic" nation to be Hispanic. My own ancestors on my mother's side immigrated from Europe to Texas when it was part of Mexico. That makes them Mexican citizens, which they initially were--until they revolted and formed the Republic of Texas as a separate nation...
Click to expand...

Hispanic is not a language. It refers to people who speak Spanish or are the descendants of Spanish speaking people.

And ...

"How does the US Census define Hispanic?
OMB defines "Hispanic or Latino" as a person of Cuban, Mexican, Puerto Rican, South or Central American, or other Spanish culture or origin regardless of race.Dec 3, 2021

https://www.census.gov › topics › hispanic-origin › about
 
Bigdog said:
Hispanic is not a language. It refers to people who speak Spanish or are the descendants of Spanish speaking people.

And ...

"How does the US Census define Hispanic?
OMB defines "Hispanic or Latino" as a person of Cuban, Mexican, Puerto Rican, South or Central American, or other Spanish culture or origin regardless of race.Dec 3, 2021

https://www.census.gov › topics › hispanic-origin › about
Click to expand...

You proved my point. Hispanic is about language. It makes a language into the equivalent of a race for all intents. I also guess Brazilians aren't "Hispanic" then...
 
T. A. Gardner said:
You proved my point. Hispanic is about language. It makes a language into the equivalent of a race for all intents. I also guess Brazilians aren't "Hispanic" then...
Click to expand...

No, I schooled you.

The gov't equates Hispanic and Latino which is incorrect.
 
Bigdog said:
No, I schooled you.

The gov't equates Hispanic and Latino which is incorrect.
Click to expand...

Yea, sure...
It refers to people who speak Spanish or are the descendants of Spanish speaking people
Click to expand...
. You said it, I only confirmed it.

It's about the language, not some racial feature.

My question also stands: Is someone from Brazil "Hispanic?"
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Yea, sure... . You said it, I only confirmed it.

It's about the language, not some racial feature.

My question also stands: Is someone from Brazil "Hispanic?"
Click to expand...

I repeat, Hispanic is NOT a language. You were wrong. Man up.

I know they speak Portuguese in Brazil. I've given you the info needed to make your own decision on the matter.
 
Bigdog said:
I repeat, Hispanic is NOT a language. You were wrong. Man up.

I know they speak Portuguese in Brazil. I've given you the info needed to make your own decision on the matter.
Click to expand...

I have. Hispanic is based on language, not race. Brazil is included in "Hispanic" even as it isn't Hispanic. The whole thing is utter nonsense and always has been. Like I said, if I wanted to, my ancestors under the current definition of "Hispanic" could be counted as Hispanic because they were at one point citizens of Mexico. That in turn would make me Hispanic too.

That's utter bullshit!
 
Bigdog said:
^^^
Typical racist anti science, white lib.

But you have no problemo with Asian/Mongoloid. :palm:
Click to expand...

Your word order is wrong. I am anti-racist "science".

The three race theory fell apart almost a hundred years ago. No scientist has used "Mongoloid" to refer to a racial group in almost a hundred years. It is extremely problematic.

The rest of racial "science" fell apart a little later. Race is a social construct, so really is not scientific.

At least "East Asian" can be used to refer to a region of origin. Asian is so vague as to be useless. The Jews come from Israel/Judea which is part of Asia, does that make Jews Asians? Asian usually means East Asian in America, it means South Asian in England, and it means white Siberian in Russia. So it has radically different definitions.
 
Walt said:
I saw this coming from the beginning. The term "Caucasian" simply does not work.
Click to expand...

ONLY IF ONE IS AS IGNORANT AS YOU.


ACTUAL GENETIC ANTHROPOLOGISTS CAN EASILY ID THE DNA MARKERS OF CAUCASIANS, WHICH ARE NOT THE SAME AS MONGOLOQAIDS AND /OR NEGROIDS.


I LOVE HOW YOU WALLOW IN IGNORANCE, WHILE FEINGING "KNOWLEDGE".


ONCE AGAIN...READ, ( HAVE ONE OF THE GROWNUPS READ IT TO YOU ) ,LEARN, AND STOP BLUBBERING YOUR INGNORAMUS NONSENSE: :laugh:




Genic variation within and between the three major races of man, Caucasoids, Negroids, and Mongoloids.






https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1762596/





WHAT A FUCKING MORON.
 
Last edited:
guno said:
What is it that you and yours most look forward to on becoming a minority :)
Click to expand...

Caucasians have always been a global minority, junior. :palm:

Why do you ban poor Black children from going to your schools, demoncrat.
 
Walt said:
Your word order is wrong. I am anti-racist "science".

The three race theory fell apart almost a hundred years ago. No scientist has used "Mongoloid" to refer to a racial group in almost a hundred years. It is extremely problematic.

The rest of racial "science" fell apart a little later. Race is a social construct, so really is not scientific.

At least "East Asian" can be used to refer to a region of origin. Asian is so vague as to be useless. The Jews come from Israel/Judea which is part of Asia, does that make Jews Asians? Asian usually means East Asian in America, it means South Asian in England, and it means white Siberian in Russia. So it has radically different definitions.
Click to expand...

Which is why you have to put your big boy pants on and learn to use big words, big sciencey words. :palm:

Wheter gentic or social construct, doesn't matter to the white lib dem media... so what's your point? :dunno:
 
Bigdog said:
Caucasians have always been a global minority, junior. :palm:
Click to expand...

I guess it all depends on how you define the term. If you include all Europeans, Middle Easterners, South Asians, and Latin Americans origins, you start looking at a possible bare majority. If you are willing to go back a few thousand years, and you have a solid majority.

But again, Caucasian is a problematic term, which does not have a good definition. It is hard to get solid numbers out of something that does not have a good definition.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top