White Libs: Are all 1st world countries Caucasian or Asian?

Walt said:
That would mean there are not independent races, your whole theory just collapsed.
Click to expand...

Why? ... because prehistoric peoples were able to cross barriers you claim are impassable?

It is the Democrat party that does everything based on skin color and what's between your legs. Racism has always been a socialist plank and you support it.
 
Walt said:
The whole "Caucasian" theory really fell apart, so really no one is "Caucasian", but lets pretend that it is reasonable for arguments sake.

Finland, Malta, Israel, Estonia, and Hungary would not be "Caucasian". None speak Indo-European languages. Hungary is not quite a First World nation, but I would say Estonia is. Their First World history is only 30 years old, but it has been a good 30 years, and they are about as well off as Italy. Hungary has a similar number of years, but those years have not been as good.

A Nazi racial "scientist" would guess the Sami/Finland slanted eyes are East Asian, but the genetics are actually held on a completely different part of the DNA. They are superficially similar, but are genetically different.

Finland and Estonia have the best education scores in the world. Hungary has the highest rate of geniuses in Europe. Israel... Well we all know the stereotype about Jews being brilliant. Malta... Malta... Malta is the exception that proves the rule that non-Caucasians are just smarter than Caucasians.

Being in the First World seems to have more to do with what region a country is than its genetics. For instance, East Germany became part of the First World, because the Iron Curtain came down, not because their genetics changed. If anything, West Germany had more immigrants from other parts of the world.



Many months ago, I wrote an incomplete list, that was incomplete. Wow, you caught me being right and saying it was an incomplete list.

So why is Israel and Malta, with their Middle East genetics able to be first world nations? Why are Finland and Estonia, with their Central Asian genetics able to be first world nations?
Click to expand...

Shouldn't expect many Righties on this board to respond to that with anything resembling an answer. Of course the irony in their criticisms is that they derive a false sense of superiority in believing that exactly what you say is true.
 
martin said:
Shouldn't expect many Righties on this board to respond to that with anything resembling an answer. Of course the irony in their criticisms is that they derive a false sense of superiority in believing that exactly what you say is true.
Click to expand...

Walt believes the blond haired, blue eyed Finns are Asian. Isn't that what the National Socialist German Workers party said, too?

So, Are all 1st world countries Caucasian or Asian?
 
Bigdog said:
Walt believes the blond haired, blue eyed Finns are Asian. Isn't that what the National Socialist German Workers party said, too?

So, Are all 1st world countries Caucasian or Asian?
Click to expand...

Obviously not. Not even your own first world country.
 
martin said:
Hispanic is more broadly about culture.
Click to expand...

Really? So, the culture of say, Chile is similar to that of Mexico hum? How about the culture of Bolivia, Cuba, or that of Costa Rica? If you meet people from those places they will emphatically tell you their culture is unique.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Really? So, the culture of say, Chile is similar to that of Mexico hum? How about the culture of Bolivia, Cuba, or that of Costa Rica? If you meet people from those places they will emphatically tell you their culture is unique.
Click to expand...

"The term Hispanic (Spanish: hispano) refers to people, cultures, or countries related to Spain, the Spanish language, or Hispanidad.

The term commonly applies to countries with a cultural and historical link to Spain and to colonies formerly part of the Spanish Empire following the Spanish colonization of the Americas, parts of the Asia-Pacific region and Africa. These are mainly countries of Hispanic America, Philippines, Equatorial Guinea and Western Sahara. In most of these countries Spanish is the predominant or official language and the cultures are derived from Spain to different degrees, combined with the local pre-Hispanic culture or other foreign influences.

Hispanic culture is a set of customs, traditions, beliefs, and art forms (music, literature, dress, architecture, cuisine, or others) that are generally shared by peoples in Hispanic regions, but which can vary considerably from one country or territory to another. The Spanish language is the main cultural element shared by Hispanic peoples.[1]["

Wikipedia (boldface added)

Wiki notes that Spanish is "the main cultural element" but Catalans, who are Spanish, speak a different language from Spanish and have other distinct cultural differences yet are Hispanic.
 
martin said:
"The term Hispanic (Spanish: hispano) refers to people, cultures, or countries related to Spain, the Spanish language, or Hispanidad.

The term commonly applies to countries with a cultural and historical link to Spain and to colonies formerly part of the Spanish Empire following the Spanish colonization of the Americas, parts of the Asia-Pacific region and Africa. These are mainly countries of Hispanic America, Philippines, Equatorial Guinea and Western Sahara. In most of these countries Spanish is the predominant or official language and the cultures are derived from Spain to different degrees, combined with the local pre-Hispanic culture or other foreign influences.

Hispanic culture is a set of customs, traditions, beliefs, and art forms (music, literature, dress, architecture, cuisine, or others) that are generally shared by peoples in Hispanic regions, but which can vary considerably from one country or territory to another. The Spanish language is the main cultural element shared by Hispanic peoples.[1]["

Wikipedia (boldface added)

Wiki notes that Spanish is "the main cultural element" but Catalans, who are Spanish, speak a different language from Spanish and have other distinct cultural differences yet are Hispanic.
Click to expand...

Tagalog and English predominate in the Philippines. Spanish is hardly present any more. Brazil is Portuguese so it isn't Hispanic either. The whole Hispanic thing is a canard in any case.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Tagalog and English predominate in the Philippines. Spanish is hardly present any more. Brazil is Portuguese so it isn't Hispanic either. The whole Hispanic thing is a canard in any case.
Click to expand...

So is Caucasian, in the U.S. anyway. In the last census around 25 million people self described as mixed race. The actual number probably is at least twice that.
 
Last edited:
Bigdog said:
Hispanic is not a language. It refers to people who speak Spanish or are the descendants of Spanish speaking people.

And ...

"How does the US Census define Hispanic?
OMB defines "Hispanic or Latino" as a person of Cuban, Mexican, Puerto Rican, South or Central American, or other Spanish culture or origin regardless of race.Dec 3, 2021

https://www.census.gov › topics › hispanic-origin › about
Click to expand...

"You're not supposed to call them Mexican anymore Beavis,you're supposed to call them ah,ah,ah Hi spandex!"
 
Bigdog said:
According to typical white lib, WALT, they are.

Walt posted:
"Name all the First World nations? Well, I will give an incomplete list:

Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Luxembourg, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Portugal, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom"
Click to expand...

Also consider the following detail you trolling ignoramus:

Poorest Asian countries 2022

Top 13 poorest countries in Asia (World Bank, by 2020 GDP per capita, current US$)*
Afghanistan ($508.80)
North Korea ($642.00 [estimated])
Yemen ($824.12)
Tajikstan ($859.13)
Syria ($870.00 [estimated])
Nepal ($1155.14)
Kyrgyzstan ($1173.61)
Pakistan ($1193.73)
Timor-Leste ($1381.17)
Myanmar ($1400.21)
Cambodia ($1512.72)
Uzbekistan ($1685.76)
India ($1900.71)
*For comparison: United States ($63,543.60)
https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/poorest-asian-countries

Top 10 Poorest Countries in Europe (by 2020 GNI per capita, Atlas method, current US$)*
Ukraine - $3,540
Georgia - $4,290
Kosovo (partially recognized) - $4,440
Moldova - $4,570
Albania - $5,210
North Macedonia - $5,720
Bosnia And Herzegovina - $6,090
Belarus - $6,330
Serbia - $7,400
Montenegro - $7,900
*If counted as European countries rather than Asian countries, the transcontinental countries Armenia ($4,220) and Azerbaijan ($4,450) would also appear on the above list."

https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/poorest-countries-in-europe

African American market growth
In 2020, African American economic clout energized the U.S. consumer market as never before. The buying power of African Americans rose to $1.6 trillion, or 9% of the nation’s total buying power.

In 2020, the 10 states with the larg*est African American markets are Texas ($149 billion), New York ($141 billion), Georgia ($118 billion), Califor*nia ($118 billion), Florida ($116 billion), Maryland ($86 billion), North Carolina ($75 billion), Virginia ($67 billion), Il*linois ($63 billion) and New Jersey ($57 billion).

The states with the fastest growth in Black buying power between 2010-2020 are North Dakota (316%), South Dakota (146%), Hawaii (113%), Idaho (109%), Washington (104%), New Hampshire (104%), Oregon (103%), Wyoming (103%), Arizona (103%) and Nevada (101%).

https://news.uga.edu/selig-multicultural-economy-report-2021/
 
Bigdog said:
Why? ... because prehistoric peoples were able to cross barriers you claim are impassable?
Click to expand...

The theory you have is that there are three "races" that are separated by impenetrable barriers. What are the impenetrable barriers keeping Europe separate? What is the magical divide between Europe and Asia?

But even that falls apart when you use the word Caucasian, which is the theory that Europeans come from Asia... Oops.
 
martin said:
Shouldn't expect many Righties on this board to respond to that with anything resembling an answer. Of course the irony in their criticisms is that they derive a false sense of superiority in believing that exactly what you say is true.
Click to expand...

First they claim their "scientific racism" is proven by science. Then they claim it is proven by what they can see. Finally, they are claiming it is all about what they can feel.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top