Another 'No Knock' killing.

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

I am familiar with the 2nd. Amendment.

Once again, who do you suggest regulate "we, the people?" And by what regulations?
 
I am familiar with the 2nd. Amendment.

Once again, who do you suggest regulate "we, the people?" And by what regulations?
Are you on the right-wing? You do realize that our Second Article of Amendment to our federal Constitution is not a Constitution unto itself, right?
 
you throw up alot of words yet haven't been able to explain any of them. simply saying it's clear and the law doesn't cut it.
That a well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the proper, natural, and safe defense of a free state, therefore, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed; that standing armies, in time of peace, should be avoided as dangerous to liberty; and that in all cases the military should be under strict subordination to, and governed by, the civil power.
 
Are you on the right-wing? You do realize that our Second Article of Amendment to our federal Constitution is not a Constitution unto itself, right?

It is part of the overwhelming constitution.

For the third time, who do you suggest regulate "we, the people?" And by what regulations?
 
I'm glad I don't live in a city. If they mistakenly no-knocked me I'd be dead because I'd take up arms against folks breaking down my door.
 
It is part of the overwhelming constitution.

For the third time, who do you suggest regulate "we, the people?" And by what regulations?
Isn't actually reading our federal Constitution required reading for the right-wing to try establish any confidence in their sincerity?
 
Isn't actually reading our federal Constitution required reading for the right-wing to try establish any confidence in their sincerity?

Interesting divergence. An insolent interpretation of one's sincerity.

So, you have no answer(s). I should have known.

As I've said, you'll have difficulty mustering a posse to break down my door.
 
Interesting divergence. An insolent interpretation of one's sincerity.

So, you have no answer(s). I should have known.

As I've said, you'll have difficulty mustering a posse to break down my door.
Why do you believe that? I thought gun lovers, loved being able to enforce legality to the laws.
 
Why do you believe that? I thought gun lovers, loved being able to enforce legality to the laws.

Simple. I've broken no laws, so none need enforced.
It is not my job to enforce laws. Vigilantism is illegal, is it not?
Oh, and I don't "love" guns. I respect their capabilities.
Will you volunteer to break down my door? The invitation stands open.
 
Simple. I've broken no laws, so none need enforced.
It is not my job to enforce laws. Vigilantism is illegal, is it not?
Oh, and I don't "love" guns. I respect their capabilities.
Will you volunteer to break down my door? The invitation stands open.
We have a Second Amendment and should have no security problems in our free States.

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
 
Simple. I've broken no laws, so none need enforced.
It is not my job to enforce laws. Vigilantism is illegal, is it not?
Oh, and I don't "love" guns. I respect their capabilities.
Will you volunteer to break down my door? The invitation stands open.
You miss the point. Well regulated militia have recourse to a heavy weapons section. What if I qualify for a mortar team?
 
Back
Top