Covid Cases Now 15% Children- Hello, DeSantis and Abbott?

nope they are poor spreaders, they are mostly asymptomatic

WRONG!

They spread it just as much as adults do.

Every single thing you've ever said about COVID has been wrong.


Bit you cant vaxx them and masks are useless (repeating for the dummies like yourself)

We're not the dummies who are dying of COVID because we didn't wear masks.

But I don't want to correct you here because the only people who are taking you seriously are the people we want to catch COVID and die anyway.
 
Between DeSantis and Abbott, they are going to end up having to shutdown their own economies again. When they have to shut them down by their own state order, and when that happens, there won't be any questions as to who is to blame for it.

Because by the time public and private schools open up to full capacity again in the next couple of weeks, the Delta is going to spread throughout those schools and neighborhoods faster than gossip at a Red Hat Ladies Convention in those two states.

When the school districts have more students sick than not- the states will have no choice but to shut them down! That will cause a chain of shutdowns and quarantines, AND THERE GOES THEIR ECONOMIES AGAIN!

AND THE VOTING AND VOCAL MAJORITY OF PEOPLE IN THOSE STATES ARE GOING TO REALIZE THAT THEIR GOVERNORS ARE TO BLAME FOR THEIR LACK OF CONCERN FOR MITIGATION EFFORTS WHEN THEY HAD A CHANCE TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT- INSTEAD OF STANDING IN THE WAY OF IT FOR POLITICAL PURPOSES!

Both governor's are already treading in pretty rough PURPLE water already.

Both governor's have been playing political suicide with their voting and vocal majorities in their states already.

Both governors are betting the farm on their state's new VOTING SUPPRESSION laws to keep them in power now- BUT even that will not be enough as that is not really a winning strategy! In fact, it will have a reverse effect!

People are just as frustrated and disgusted with TRUMP AND HIS CULT as they are this dangerous virus now threatening the un-vaccinated- including all the children K - 9th grade specifically!

The Trump cult is declining and the Virus is spreading out of control again! DO the math!
 
Last edited:
nope they are poor spreaders, they are mostly asymptomatic
Bit you cant vaxx them and masks are useless (repeating for the dummies like yourself)

But wait there is more!!!! call in the next ten minutes and annata/dukkha will send to you a book on his medical wisdom as endorsed by Sidney Powell, my pillow guy and rand Paul!!!


e52.gif
 
Last edited:
N 95 are basically respirators. not the surgcal blue mask we all wear
which do not stop virus

yes, they do, you are a moron.

What evidence do we have that wearing a mask is effective in preventing COVID-19?
There are several strands of evidence supporting the efficacy of masks.

One category of evidence comes from laboratory studies of respiratory droplets and the ability of various masks to block them. An experiment using high-speed video found that hundreds of droplets ranging from 20 to 500 micrometers were generated when saying a simple phrase, but that nearly all these droplets were blocked when the mouth was covered by a damp washcloth. Another study of people who had influenza or the common cold found that wearing a surgical mask significantly reduced the amount of these respiratory viruses emitted in droplets and aerosols.

But the strongest evidence in favor of masks come from studies of real-world scenarios. “The most important thing are the epidemiologic data,” said Rutherford. Because it would be unethical to assign people to not wear a mask during a pandemic, the epidemiological evidence has come from so-called “experiments of nature.”

A recent study published in Health Affairs, for example, compared the COVID-19 growth rate before and after mask mandates in 15 states and the District of Columbia. It found that mask mandates led to a slowdown in daily COVID-19 growth rate, which became more apparent over time. The first five days after a mandate, the daily growth rate slowed by 0.9 percentage-points compared to the five days prior to the mandate; at three weeks, the daily growth rate had slowed by 2 percentage-points.

Another study looked at coronavirus deaths across 198 countries and found that those with cultural norms or government policies favoring mask-wearing had lower death rates.

Two compelling case reports also suggest that masks can prevent transmission in high-risk scenarios, said Chin-Hong and Rutherford. In one case, a man flew from China to Toronto and subsequently tested positive for COVID-19. He had a dry cough and wore a mask on the flight, and all 25 people closest to him on the flight tested negative for COVID-19. In another case, in late May, two hair stylists in Missouri had close contact with 140 clients while sick with COVID-19. Everyone wore a mask and none of the clients tested positive.

Do masks protect the people wearing them or the people around them?
“I think there’s enough evidence to say that the best benefit is for people who have COVID-19 to protect them from giving COVID-19 to other people, but you’re still going to get a benefit from wearing a mask if you don’t have COVID-19,” said Chin-Hong.

Masks may be more effective as a “source control” because they can prevent larger expelled droplets from evaporating into smaller droplets that can travel farther.

https://www.ucsf.edu/news/2020/06/4...s-heres-science-behind-how-face-masks-prevent
 
Between DeSantis and Abbott, they are going to end up having to shutdown their own economies again. When they have to shut them down by their own state order, and when that happens, there won't be any questions as to who is to blame for it.

Because by the time public and private schools open up to full capacity again in the next couple of weeks, the Delta is going to spread throughout those schools and neighborhoods faster than gossip at a Red Hat Ladies Convention in those two states.

When the school districts have more students sick than not- the states will have no choice but to shut them down! That will cause a chain of shutdowns and quarantines, AND THERE GOES THEIR ECONOMIES AGAIN!

AND THE VOTING AND VOCAL MAJORITY OF PEOPLE IN THOSE STATES ARE GOING TO REALIZE THAT THEIR GOVERNORS ARE TO BLAME FOR THEIR LACK OF CONCERN FOR MITIGATION EFFORTS WHEN THEY HAD A CHANCE TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT- INSTEAD OF STANDING IN THE WAY OF IT FOR POLITICAL PURPOSES!

Both governor's are already treading in pretty rough PURPLE water already.

Both governor's have been playing political suicide with their voting and vocal majorities in their states already.

Both governors are betting the farm on their state's new VOTING SUPPRESSION laws to keep them in power now- BUT even that will not be enough as that is not really a winning strategy! In fact, it will have a reverse effect!

People are just as frustrated and disgusted with TRUMP AND HIS CULT as they are this dangerous virus now threatening the un-vaccinated- including all the children K - 9th grade specifically!

The Trump cult is declining and the Virus is spreading out of control again! DO the math!

They're not going to shut anything down...they're just going to continue playing pretend because they know people like Anatta will come along and gaslight everyone into thinking that the plague-ravaged states of Florida and Texas are actually doing better than everywhere else.
 
But wait there is more!!!! call in the next ten minutes and annata/dukkha will send to you a book on his medical wisdom as endorsed by Sidney Powell, my pillow guy and rand Paul!!!


e52.gif

Hey remember when Anatta said that if you took a Lupus drug, you could cure COVID?
 
yes, they do, you are a moron.

What evidence do we have that wearing a mask is effective in preventing COVID-19?
There are several strands of evidence supporting the efficacy of masks.

One category of evidence comes from laboratory studies of respiratory droplets and the ability of various masks to block them. An experiment using high-speed video found that hundreds of droplets ranging from 20 to 500 micrometers were generated when saying a simple phrase, but that nearly all these droplets were blocked when the mouth was covered by a damp washcloth. Another study of people who had influenza or the common cold found that wearing a surgical mask significantly reduced the amount of these respiratory viruses emitted in droplets and aerosols.

But the strongest evidence in favor of masks come from studies of real-world scenarios. “The most important thing are the epidemiologic data,” said Rutherford. Because it would be unethical to assign people to not wear a mask during a pandemic, the epidemiological evidence has come from so-called “experiments of nature.”

A recent study published in Health Affairs, for example, compared the COVID-19 growth rate before and after mask mandates in 15 states and the District of Columbia. It found that mask mandates led to a slowdown in daily COVID-19 growth rate, which became more apparent over time. The first five days after a mandate, the daily growth rate slowed by 0.9 percentage-points compared to the five days prior to the mandate; at three weeks, the daily growth rate had slowed by 2 percentage-points.

Another study looked at coronavirus deaths across 198 countries and found that those with cultural norms or government policies favoring mask-wearing had lower death rates.

Two compelling case reports also suggest that masks can prevent transmission in high-risk scenarios, said Chin-Hong and Rutherford. In one case, a man flew from China to Toronto and subsequently tested positive for COVID-19. He had a dry cough and wore a mask on the flight, and all 25 people closest to him on the flight tested negative for COVID-19. In another case, in late May, two hair stylists in Missouri had close contact with 140 clients while sick with COVID-19. Everyone wore a mask and none of the clients tested positive.

Do masks protect the people wearing them or the people around them?
“I think there’s enough evidence to say that the best benefit is for people who have COVID-19 to protect them from giving COVID-19 to other people, but you’re still going to get a benefit from wearing a mask if you don’t have COVID-19,” said Chin-Hong.

Masks may be more effective as a “source control” because they can prevent larger expelled droplets from evaporating into smaller droplets that can travel farther.

https://www.ucsf.edu/news/2020/06/4...s-heres-science-behind-how-face-masks-prevent
bunch of anecdotal, and non-supported stats. Lockdowns and masks dont stop the spread
Once the virus is out it's out,and all you can do is get vaxxed and stay healthy

for those compromised -they serious need social distancing -masks are not going to do it
Every place has had the 2 waves (that i know of) , and now lambda will do it's thing

Yes they prevent droplets EXPELLED -but once it's aerosol, blue surgical masks are an affectation of protection
for the wearer

You should put some of this energy protesting Biden's million+ super-spreader at the border instead of banging on and on about masks
 
bunch of anecdotal, and non-supported stats. Lockdowns and masks dont stop the spread
Once the virus is out it'sout,and allyou can do is get vaxxed and stay healthy

Wait a second, because last year at this time, you were saying that we could achieve herd immunity without a vaccine.

So is this another Anatta flip-flop?
 
Yes they prevent droplets EXPELLED -but once it's aerosol, blue surgical masks are an affectation of protection
for the wearer

Keep saying shit like this because the only people listening to you are the people we want to die of COVID so they can't vote in next year's midterms.
 
you are a moron.
No, YOU are... as evidenced below by your outsourcing of your thinking to USA Today, a source which I do not accept btw.

But the physics involved don’t work like that at all.
Yes, it does.

The COVID-19 particle is indeed around 0.1 microns in size, but it is always bonded to something larger.
No, it isn't.

“There is never a naked virus floating in the air or released by people,” said Linsey Marr, a professor of civil and environmental engineering at Virginia Tech who specializes in airborne transmission of viruses.
Yes, there is. Linsey Marr is wrong. He also seems to not realize that droplets/aerosols can and do evaporate.

The virus attaches to water droplets or aerosols (i.e. really small droplets) that are generated by breathing, talking, coughing, etc.
Not always the case...

These consist of water, mucus protein and other biological material and are all larger than 1 micron.
No, not all of them.

“Breathing and talking generate particles around 1 micron in size, which will be collected by N95 respirator filters with very high efficiency,” said Lisa Brosseau, a retired professor of environmental and occupational health sciences who spent her career researching respiratory protection.
Sure, an N95 will capture a good number of larger particles, but not all of them. It will capture basically no viruses though, as they are smaller than the pores of such a mask. Additionally, the vast majority of people are not wearing those masks to begin with; they are wearing masks with much larger pores in them (which won't even filter out the larger particles).

Size matters, but not how you think
But that’s not the only logical flaw in this claim.
I've already explained how your outsourced thinkers are wrong.

The N95 filter indeed is physically around the 0.3 micron size. But that doesn’t mean it can only stop particles larger than that.
Yes, it does... and it doesn't even stop all particles of that size.

The masks are actually best for particles either larger or smaller than that 0.3 micron threshold.
Not smaller... only larger.

“N95 have the worst filtration efficiency for particles around 0.3,” Marr said. “If you’re smaller than that those are actually collected even better. It’s counterintuitive because masks do not work like sieving out larger particles. It’s not like pasta in a colander, and small ones don’t get through.”
Lies. You cannot stop a mosquito with a chain link fence.

N95 masks actually have that name because they are 95% efficient at stopping particles in their least efficient particle size range — in this case those around 0.3 microns.
95% at 0.3 micron is NOT 100% at 0.1 micron. A 0.1 micron object will go through a 0.3 micron hole like it is candy going through a child's open mouth.

I suggest that you stop allowing USA Today to do your thinking for you. Obviously, USA Today is not very good at it, which is why I do not accept it as a source.
 
do you even understand acquired immunity?

I don't believe that you do.

I think you just say whatever you think will save face at any given time, because your track record when it comes to COVID is pretty fucking poor.

You said it was a hoax.

You said it was "no worse than the flu".

You said it would "disappear in the Spring".

You said kids couldn't catch it or spread it.

You said to drink bleach.

You said to shine a lightbulb up your ass.

You said to take a Lupus drug.

You said social distancing didn't work, then you did, then you didn't.

You said masks didn't work, then you did, then you didn't.

You tried to give Trump credit for vaccines when he waited 6 months to expedite approvals.

You said the warm weather would kill it.

You brag about Trump's travel ban but can't account for the 40,000 COVID-exposed people Trump literally brought into the country and then spread all around in Feb-Mar 2020.

Every single fucking thing you have uttered about COVID has been completely fucking wrong...and that's why the only people really dying of COVID now are your "very fine people" who actually believed the shit you've been saying the last 20 months.
 
Hello Darth,

Google the Covid mortality rate for healthy kids and get back with us, Genius.

That was actually a good piece Anatta linked for a couple reasons: one is it illustrated how democrats are hell bent on cynically using the CCP bug as a political weapon.

OK, stop right there.

Trump made the pandemic political.

He had a chance to step up to the plate and hit a home run in responding to the pandemic. He whiffed. 3 strikes he was voted out. The mighty Trump had struck out. He could have been virtually assured a second term but he blew it.
 
They're not going to shut anything down...they're just going to continue playing pretend because they know people like Anatta will come along and gaslight everyone into thinking that the plague-ravaged states of Florida and Texas are actually doing better than everywhere else.

I don't think they will have the choice to keep them open. I believe the school districts will sue the states to protect their best interests of the children and the public.
 
No, YOU are... as evidenced below by your outsourcing of your thinking to USA Today, a source which I do not accept btw.


Yes, it does.


No, it isn't.


Yes, there is. Linsey Marr is wrong. He also seems to not realize that droplets/aerosols can and do evaporate.


Not always the case...


No, not all of them.


Sure, an N95 will capture a good number of larger particles, but not all of them. It will capture basically no viruses though, as they are smaller than the pores of such a mask. Additionally, the vast majority of people are not wearing those masks to begin with; they are wearing masks with much larger pores in them (which won't even filter out the larger particles).


I've already explained how your outsourced thinkers are wrong.


Yes, it does... and it doesn't even stop all particles of that size.


Not smaller... only larger.


Lies. You cannot stop a mosquito with a chain link fence.


95% at 0.3 micron is NOT 100% at 0.1 micron. A 0.1 micron object will go through a 0.3 micron hole like it is candy going through a child's open mouth.


I suggest that you stop allowing USA Today to do your thinking for you. Obviously, USA Today is not very good at it, which is why I do not accept it as a source.
They keep saying "droplets" - but virus can attach to even humidity ( which are also water vapor droplets)
in essence virus can just ride airborn - it doesnt need "biological material)

and the bad part about masks, is people touch the masks then touch their face
Kids are even worse
 
Google the Covid mortality rate for healthy kids and get back with us, Genius.

Downplaying COVID isn't going to win you anything.


hat was actually a good piece Anatta linked for a couple reasons: one is it illustrated how democrats are hell bent on cynically using the CCP bug as a political weapon.

"I always wanted to play it down."
-Donald Trump, February 7th, 2020
 
The other reason is that the article exposes the weakness in the democrats argument. FL is more than Covid. Obviously, a trite statement but democrats have forced us into making them. FL has the jobs and economy *precisely because* DeSantis and his rebellion against the ‘one size fits all’ method of warding off the Bat Lady’s CCP bug. And it’s worked. People either know it or they don’t fret over the Bug enough to keep them from going to FL.

There is no better place in the world right now to catch COVID than in Florida.

"I always wanted to downplay it."
-Donald Trump, February 7th, 2020
 
Back
Top