WHAT HAPPENS WHEN THE POST 2020 ELECTION FORSENIC AUDITS PROVE BIDEN CHEATED

[christiefan915]

Remember that it is not you so much seeing this 'minority', it is the press (the national propaganda service) and they are reporting it to you. I seriously doubt you have gone out to discuss this with the bulk of the population of the United States.

There are, however, encouraging signs. You can see it simply in the numbers of people that attended Trump rallies, who they were, and how their enthusiasm came about. Remember the Democrats want to try to quash this...with excuses that it never really happened, they are mindless drones, they're wackjobs, etc.

I submit you are coming from a distorted view. I am not as defeatist as that. The stuff that's happening out there that is never reported in the news is making a difference.

Whether you like Trump or not is immaterial. People viewed him as a man that stands for liberty, the Constitution, and as a patriot.

The still do. They haven't gone anywhere.

^ Appeal to popularity.

 

[Into the Night]

If they found the evidence in one of the six previous audits, why are Republicans doing a seventh audit? Why have they not presented the evidence to the courts, or even to the public?

RQAA. Stop asking the same question over and over mindlessly. They've already been answered.

 

[Into the Night]

For those fools, idiots, and trolls that claim that the courts never heard a single case, let me present a case or two that was clearly heard and Trump lost in court.

https://www.wicourts.gov/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=315395

The court clearly looked at the evidence presented and said the remedy was without merit both in the law and in reason.


Then there is this one where once again, the court clearly looked at the evidence presented and found it lacking.
https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/11/2020AP1930-OAfinal-12-4-20.pdf

You can't wish away the evidence, dude.

 

[Into the Night]

I know, and I didn't say that you had.

Yet you made the pivot fallacy all the same.

 

[Into the Night]

Anybody with an ounce of brains knows that trump grew the swamp and filled it with his corrupt cronies, major donors and other unsuitable hacks. trump didn't give a rat's ass about government and how to run it; all he wanted was absolute loyalty from his selections. Good people didn't want to work for him and bad people stuck around forever. No wonder this country went to hell in a handbasket during his administration; how could it not?

Except it didn't. The nation did well under Trump's administration.

 

[Into the Night]

Texas had no dispute with any of those states. All nine justices found nothing to support the plaintiff. Only two thought the case should be heard because they thought they were obligated to hear cases under its original jurisdiction.

"The State of Texas's motion for leave to file a bill of complaint is denied for lack of standing under Article III of the Constitution. Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections. All other pending motions are dismissed as moot."

Even if the SC had voted to hear the case Texas had no evidence to support their case. The statistical analysis filed to support the case was found to have no credibility, logic, and be statistically incompetent.

You can't wish the evidence away, dude. Texas did have standing.

 

[Into the Night]

^ Appeal to popularity.

That's right. And not a fallacy.

 

[Jarod]

No, that's not right, If Biden won the election through Democrat cheating and this can be clearly demonstrated. What it means is that Biden never was, and is not, a legitimate President. Because that electoral cheating nullified any Constitutionality the Presidential election claimed to have. If Biden et al cheated to win , then Biden is simply not the legitimate President of the United States.




Dachshund



DLM...Dachshund Lives Matter !

Legally, I think you are incorrect. Once Congress has certified the votes, there is no more review. I’m 10,000% certain there was not enough voter fraud to have significantly affected the outcome of this election. In fact I would bet there’s more voter fraud in trumps favor than Biden. THAT BEING SAID, It does not matter even if there was, Congress already certified it. You are delusional.

 

[Flash]

You can't wish the evidence away, dude. Texas did have standing.

You can't wish the evidence away and you can't find any, either.

On the issue of standing for Texas: Supreme Court=9 v. Into the Night=1.

There was no dispute between TX and PA, GA, MI, WI.

You want to take away the right of the states to make their own decisions regarding elections and electoral votes by having a federal court overrule their own court decisions.

 

[Flash]

Legally, I think you are incorrect. Once Congress has certified the votes, there is no more review. I’m 10,000% certain there was not enough voter fraud to have significantly affected the outcome of this election. In fact I would bet there’s more voter fraud in trumps favor than Biden. THAT BEING SAID, It does not matter even if there was, Congress already certified it. You are delusional.

And, there is nothing in the Constitution allowing an election to be nullified.

 

[Legion]

Yet you made the pivot fallacy all the same.

Not my intent. I asked you a question.

 

[Legion]

You can't wish the evidence away and you can't find any, either.

Lack of evidence is not evidence of it not happening.

We need full forensic audits.

 

[Into the Night]

Legally, I think you are incorrect. Once Congress has certified the votes, there is no more review. I’m 10,000% certain there was not enough voter fraud to have significantly affected the outcome of this election. In fact I would bet there’s more voter fraud in trumps favor than Biden. THAT BEING SAID, It does not matter even if there was, Congress already certified it. You are delusional.

There was no election. The election faulted due to election fraud by Democrats.

 

[Into the Night]

You can't wish the evidence away and you can't find any, either.

I already presented it to you idiot. So have others. You can't wish it away. RQAA.

On the issue of standing for Texas: Supreme Court=9 v. Into the Night=1.

Irrelevant.

There was no dispute between TX and PA, GA, MI, WI.

Yes there was.

You want to take away the right of the states to make their own decisions regarding elections and electoral votes by having a federal court overrule their own court decisions.

Courts are not authorized to choose the electors for a State.
No one was asking them to.

 

[Into the Night]

And, there is nothing in the Constitution allowing an election to be nullified.

What election? There was no election. The election faulted due to election fraud by Democrats.

 

[Flash]

What election? There was no election. The election faulted due to election fraud by Democrats.

Where does the concept of a "faulted" election come from. Certainly not in the Constitution or state laws regarding the selection of electors.

You might have a point if you had any evidence of fraud which you have yet to provide. Because some right-wing source claimed there was fraud does not mean you have to believe it. Do some research that doesn't involve YouTube.

 

[Flash]

We need full forensic audits.

The Cyber Ninjas were using lights to look for bamboo residue in AZ. Is that forensic enough?

Most of the recounts (GA) were forensic.

 

[Legion]

Most of the recounts (GA) were forensic.

Who told you that?

What part of "we need full forensic audits" don't you understand?

 

[Jarod]

And, there is nothing in the Constitution allowing an election to be nullified.

Correct

 

[Jarod]

There was no election. The election faulted due to election fraud by Democrats.

Yet Congress certified it!