WHAT HAPPENS WHEN THE POST 2020 ELECTION FORSENIC AUDITS PROVE BIDEN CHEATED

What mathematical law are you referring to?

There is no mathematical law that shows Biden lost the election. There is proof that RWers don't know shit about math when they make such a claim about mathematical laws. Following the evidence would mean that one counts the votes instead of relying on some made up math that claims that a vote count has to follow a certain pattern or it is invalid. Such a claim about math is complete nonsense since it ignores so many mathematical principles that it would actually be a violation of math laws.

Denial of probability mathematics. Denial of history. You can't wish the evidence away, dude.
 
You gave me links with no remarks



I looked at them and they supported the real facts and not your lie filled pile of turds


You prove what you claim they say


That is how a real discussion happens between real humans you ass slimed Russian bot hole

insult fallacies. Argument of the stone fallacies. Bigotry. You can't wish the evidence away, dude.
 
LOL, he's referring to the 'mathematical impossibility' of Biden overcoming Trumps 'lead' in various states. Simple minded people are persuaded by this argument because of it's simplicity. It assumes that votes are counted in a random order. They are not, therefore the whole thing is bullshit.

Want a mathematical certainty? In Pennsylvania, for example, when Trump had only a half million vote lead after same day voting was counted, it was a mathematical certainty that he would lose the state. It was inevitable. Why? Because a huge majority of Biden votes had yet to be counted, assuming that mail in ballots returned by Democrats would be a vote for Biden. It's math. Arminus flunked math.

Inversion fallacy. Denial of probability mathematics. Denial of history. Divisional error fallacy.
 
Trump and his allies filed more than 40 lawsuits challenging the 2020 election results. All of them failed.

Jacob Shamsian and Sonam Sheth Feb 22, 2021, 5:03 PM


Trump and allies filed dozens of lawsuits in an effort to contest the results of the 2020 election.
His campaign filed lawsuits and motions to intervene in cases in several swing states.
They've notched zero victories.
Visit the Business section of Insider for more stories.

After losing the 2020 election to a man he spent months hammering as corrupt, doddering, and mentally deficient, President Donald Trump went on the offense, spreading lies and conspiracy theories about a "rigged" election marred by "major fraud" from Democrats.

Before the Capitol insurrection on January 6, Trump's claims alternated between demanding that some states stop counting ballots, which he didn't have the power to do, and saying that others should keep counting, which they were doing anyway.

To that end, the Trump campaign, Republican allies, and Trump himself had mounted at least 42 legal challenges since Election Day.

They've won zero. President Joe Biden was inaugurated on January 20.


The lawsuits argued that states and counties violated election laws, playing into Trump's political strategy to discredit the results of the 2020 election. The House impeached him a second time in January, charging him with inciting an insurrection, and the Senate acquitted him on February 13.

Republicans filed the lawsuits in local, state, and federal courts in Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, and Pennsylvania — all states that Biden won. They also filed direct appeals to the Supreme Court, all of which also failed.

The Trump campaign initially had a single win, when a Pennsylvania judge ruled on November 12 that first-time voters were supposed to confirm their IDs with county boards of election by November 9, rather than November 12. The decision opened the door to disqualify the ballots of people who didn't verify their IDs in time. But the state Supreme Court later overturned that decision.

Here's what happened with all of Trump's election lawsuits.


Here's a list of the lawsuits and where they stand
Direct appeals to the Supreme Court — 3 losses

Several Republican politicians, led by Rep. Mike Kelly, asked the US Supreme Court to block the certification of Pennsylvania's election results. The court turned down the case.
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton sued Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin in the US Supreme Court seeking to overturn their election results. The Supreme Court rejected the case.
The Trump campaign asked the US Supreme Court to overturn three decisions from the Pennsylvania Supreme Court over various technical rules regarding absentee and mail-in ballots. The court rejected the case on

The Pennsylvania State court is guilty of contempt of a federal court. There was no valid election results for Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, or Wisconsin. The legislature of a State are the ONLY ones that can choose the electors for a State. See Article II.

I already know you do not recognize the Constitution of the United States nor any State constitution.
 
Direct appeals to the Supreme Court — 3 losses

Several Republican politicians, led by Rep. Mike Kelly, asked the US Supreme Court to block the certification of Pennsylvania's election results. The court turned down the case.
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton sued Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin in the US Supreme Court seeking to overturn

The Supreme Court does not choose electors for anyone. Only State legislatures have that authority. There were no valid election results. The election faulted due to election fraud by Democrats.
 
You never did with your claimed proof you little Hitler boy


What’s the matter


You too busy killing Jews you nazi?

Hitler was a socialist. Fascism is a form of socialism. Democrats WANT fascism. They also want communism, that other form of socialism.
 
You didnt give that level of proof


I did



You are in a political cult


So your brain is obviously malfunctioning


I thank you for helping repeat the actual facts OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER



while you prove you are not

human


Again


Thanks bro

Circular argument fallacy. Attempted proof by assertion. Attempted proof by contextomy.
You can't wish the evidence away, dude.
 
Without comment


So the Russo bot hole asks me to post their statements



This is Russian bot hole tactics folks


They exist to cause confusion and consternation


Let’s just keep posting the facts as often as possible


It dissolves the bots

Bigotry. Bury it.
 
Back
Top