Trump didn’t incite it and he didn’t condone it.
That’s speculation which goes beyond the evidence and that’s been the problem all along. If that evidence exists where is the criminal indictment?
This makes the second impeachment House Democrats embarked on knowing they didn’t have the votes in the Senate. And no, it’s not because of cowardly republicans. There are enough Senate republicans that would be happy to be rid of Trump BUT they aren’t going to take a politically risky vote without compelling evidence.
They know the evidence in both proceedings was thin and they didn’t want to go back and try and defend their vote in front of constituents that knew it was thin, as well. That’s not the way to get re-elected.
Democrats may have inflicted political damage on a Trump with these misguided impeachments but they have damaged themselves in the process.
They now own an 0-2 conviction record—against the same president.
That’s historical but it’s not good history.
As a loyal Trumper it's surprising you have this backwards. The point is Trump did incite and condone it and that's fine. Time to move on. You need to remember your marching orders.

