Can Republicans show me the part of the Constitution that requires publishing?

Stop complaining about an ounce of prevention. Better contraceptives at lower cost! And, it is more immoral for right wingers to complain about Taxes for social services for the naturally born kids y'all insist on.

Why would the cost of someone else's contraceptives matter to me. It's not my responsibility to provide an ounce or 10 tons of prevention to someone that claims her body, her choice.

It's immoral to claim your body, your choice then demand someone else you told to butt out fund it for you.
 
Why would the cost of someone else's contraceptives matter to me. It's not my responsibility to provide an ounce or 10 tons of prevention to someone that claims her body, her choice.

It's immoral to claim your body, your choice then demand someone else you told to butt out fund it for you.
Not if they are in poverty or simply Poor under our form of Capitalism. Promoting the general welfare means finding solutions that provide for it.
 
Not if they are in poverty or simply Poor under our form of Capitalism. Promoting the general welfare means finding solutions that provide for it.

If they failed under capitalism, it's not the responsibility of someone else to take care of them. They caused their failure. They made their choice with their body. Let them pay or let them do without regardless of the results.

I found a solution. You don't like it. You make the choice, you pay the price. If you can't, tough shit. Make better choices.
 
While freedom of speech is one of the most sacrosanct freedoms in American history, there are a variety of exceptions to the general principle that speech is protected under the First Amendment.

- Incitement

- Fighting Words

- Obscenity

- Defamation

- Commercial Speech

- Cases in which freedom of speech is outweighed by an even more compelling interest
 
Why would the cost of someone else's contraceptives matter to me. It's not my responsibility to provide an ounce or 10 tons of prevention to someone that claims her body, her choice.

It's immoral to claim your body, your choice then demand someone else you told to butt out fund it for you.
Your line of reasoning seems very disingenuous, at best. It is immoral to complain about the Cost of social services and the Taxes you have to pay for naturally born citizens of our Republic, y'all insist on.
 
If they failed under capitalism, it's not the responsibility of someone else to take care of them.

Yes, it is. You are being disingenuous to a fault and being an immoral hypocrite when Corporate Welfare is alive and well and has even paid multimillion dollar bonuses. Right wingers only seem to complain about the Poor while seeming to be cronies for the Rich.
 
Which is what I said. Hate speech is protected. And you are correct about future SCOTUS decisions though they have yet to rule against free speech.

It's not exactly what you said. There are state statutes against hate speech which have to this point not been struck down.
 
LYING MOTHERFUCKER; NO ONE HAS EVER MADE THAT CLAIM.

jLzOLje.png
 
There is no right to platform morals on a for-profit basis; Capitalists are supposed to be maximizing profits not their alleged morals.

there's no right to gay cake. but if you sell cake you have to make it gay if someone wants a gay cake.

if you're in the platform business, you're in the platform business. free speech as a corollary must be added to 230, or it should be abandoned all together.
 
there's no right to gay cake. but if you sell cake you have to make it gay if someone wants a gay cake.

if you're in the platform business, you're in the platform business. free speech as a corollary must be added to 230, or it should be abandoned all together.
right wing bigotry is not very profitable. only lousy Capitalists engage in it on a for-profit basis.
 
Republicans have recently claimed that the Constitution allows the government to force publishers to publish things. The publishers also have to pay politician book authors large amounts of money for these books.

I always thought one of the freedoms of the press was the freedom not to publish something. If a book publisher does not want to publish a book, they are free to not publish the book. They do have to pay the contractual obligations, but not the full advance. Likewise, Twitter does not have to publish trump's anti-American tweets.

There are more possible internet addresses than there are atoms in the universe. You want to setup your own servers, go ahead and do it.

Data scientist Rebekah Jones did just that. First Republicans tried to get her deplatformed, but she had her own server. Then they tried to get internet service cutoff to her home, but could not do that legally. Finally, they sent police into her home to threaten her family, and steal her server... And she bought new server. A server costs less than a thousand dollars.
I dont believe you. You lefties will stop at nothing. You would hang your own granny.
 
rebeka jones = unrelated to big tech censorship.

Have you turned in STY to the FBI yet? Or are you afraid he'd hurt you for even thinking about it?

If I were you, I'd document everything you have; names, addresses, contacts, etc and keep it in a safe place only to be opened in the event of your death, "suicide" or murder.

Make it so that you can't touch it or retrieve it even if tortured or they threaten family members. That becomes your insurance policy against RW terrorists. Usually this involves a fucking lawyer.
 
Have you turned in STY to the FBI yet? Or are you afraid he'd hurt you for even thinking about it?

If I were you, I'd document everything you have; names, addresses, contacts, etc and keep it in a safe place only to be opened in the event of your death, "suicide" or murder.

stfu, tard.

:tardthoughts:
 
Back
Top