If the Senate allows a fair trial...

[Ross Dolan]

You offered nothing, liar. You are locked in two paradoxes and are being irrational.

Very snug.

 

[Ross Dolan]

Thanks, Parrot. That is exactly what Frank is doing.

No, Dog...and you know it.

But let that nut-case speak for you.

He's a gas!

 

[Bigdog]

Thanks for admitting there was No extortion on the phone call, frank.

Glad we cleared that up.

 

[Bigdog]

No, Dog...and you know it.

But let that nut-case speak for you.

He's a gas!

Thanks for admitting there was No extortion on the phone call, frank.

Glad we cleared that up.

 

[Ross Dolan]

Thanks for admitting there was No extortion on the phone call, frank.

Glad we cleared that up.

Yeah, I didn't think you would acknowledge a mistake...or apologize.

Okay...that doesn't make you a jerk.

But...uhhh...continuing to support Trump.

Well...that...ya know.

 

[saltydancin]

I raise you your 800 prosecutors to 800 more! Call that bet, sucker!

And there were only 2 Catholics of Pelosi & Trump playing law & order under that Knights of Columbus one nation under God "man is God" interpretation until it escalated into the national religion jihad crusades building a rock pyramid stairway to the stars where space is the place for the human race trial reasoning.

 

[Bigdog]

Yeah, I didn't think you would acknowledge a mistake...or apologize.

Okay...that doesn't make you a jerk.

But...uhhh...continuing to support Trump.

Well...that...ya know.

You have to see a threat for there to be extortion.

It was a perfect phone call.

Vindman testified that he only presumed that asking for a favor implied an obvious threat.

 

[Ross Dolan]

You have to see a threat for there to be extortion.

It was a perfect phone call.

Vindman testified that he only presumed that asking for a favor implied an obvious threat.

It was far from a perfect phone call. The "fucking moron" as Rex Tillerson described him, is unable to do anything perfect.

In any case, earlier you wrote:

You are the one claiming that an obvious threat was made in the phone call

To which I replied,

I defy you to find any post of mine where I said that an obvious threat was made in the phone call.

I still defy you to do it.

You can't...and apparently you do not have the ethical wherewithal to acknowledge you were wrong. Character is important, Dog. Develop some right here. Or...continue to support a person with none at all, like Trump.

 

[Bigdog]

It was far from a perfect phone call. The "fucking moron" as Rex Tillerson described him, is unable to do anything perfect.

In any case, earlier you wrote:



To which I replied,




I still defy you to do it.

You can't...and apparently you do not have the ethical wherewithal to acknowledge you were wrong. Character is important, Dog. Develop some right here. Or...continue to support a person with none at all, like Trump.

Vindman testified that he only presumed that asking for a favor implied an obvious threat.

You cited "the testimony" that declared an obvious threat was present in the phone call as part of your extortion claim, Frank. That's why you get no apology.

 

[Ross Dolan]

Vindman testified that he only presumed that asking for a favor implied an obvious threat.

You cited "the testimony" that declared an obvious threat was present in the phone call as part of your extortion claim, Frank. That's why you get no apology.

I get no apology because you do not have the character needed to offer it.

You will not acknowledge you were wrong when you claim I did what I did not do...because you do not have the character to do so.

Hey...as I said...that doesn't make you a jerk.

Continuing to support the abomination, Trump...well, that's another story!

 

[Ross Dolan]

Vindman testified that he only presumed that asking for a favor implied an obvious threat.

You cited "the testimony" that declared an obvious threat was present in the phone call as part of your extortion claim, Frank. That's why you get no apology.

By the way...WHERE did I say that "an obvious threat was present in the phone call?"

Huh?

 

[Bigdog]

By the way...WHERE did I say that "an obvious threat was present in the phone call?"

Huh?

You cited "the testimony" as proof of extortion. Vindman testified that asking for a favor implied an obvious threat. So yeah, you said it by doing that. I wasn't quoting you verbatim.

 

[Ross Dolan]

You cited "the testimony" as proof of extortion. Vindman testified that asking for a favor implied an obvious threat. So yeah, you said it by doing that. I wasn't quoting you verbatim.

You are not only NOT QUOTING me verbatim...you are not quoting me accurately.

And Vindman was not the only person testifying.

C'mon. Show some character.

If it were Moi...I would simply say, "I was wrong...you were right. I apologize."

You don't even have to write it out...you can cut and paste it.

 

[Bigdog]

You are not only NOT QUOTING me verbatim...you are not quoting me accurately.

And Vindman was not the only person testifying.

C'mon. Show some character.

If it were Moi...I would simply say, "I was wrong...you were right. I apologize."

You don't even have to write it out...you can cut and paste it.

I paraphrased your position, Frank.

Are you now asking me to exclude Vindman's testimony because you disagree with it?

 

[Ross Dolan]

I paraphrased your position, Frank.

You did not paraphrase me in any reasonable way.

Quote me.

Are you now asking me to exclude Vindman's testimony because you disagree with it?

I am not. I am asking you two things.

One...include the totality of the testimony...which is the only thing that makes sense. To me...the totality of the testimony indicates that Trump attempted to shake Zelensky down...to extort him.

Two...to acknowledge that you were wrong when you asserted that I had claimed that an obvious threat was made in the phone call.

Care to do either of those things?

 

[Bigdog]

You did not paraphrase me in any reasonable way.
uote me.
I am not. I am asking you two things.

One...include the totality of the testimony...which is the only thing that makes sense. To me...the totality of the testimony indicates that Trump attempted to shake Zelensky down...to extort him.

Two...to acknowledge that you were wrong when you asserted that I had claimed that an obvious threat was made in the phone call.

Care to do either of those things?

It is becoming clear you are trying to bullshit your way thru this thread without really knowing the testimony. You should always factchcek those twitter memes you like to parrot, Frank. That way you won't get burned like you did on this thread.

I did include the totality. It is you that wants to exclude V's testimony, not me. Vindman's and Sondland's testimony are the only two really important ones. And you disagree with Vindman.

 

[Ross Dolan]

It is becoming clear you are trying to bullshit your way thru this thread without really knowing the testimony. You should always factchcek those twitter memes you like to parrot, Frank. That way you won't get burned like you did on this thread.

I did include the totality. It is you that wants to exclude V's testimony, not me. Vindman's and Sondland's testimony are the only two really important ones. And you disagree with Vindman.

Dog...you are full of shit...and apparently do not have the strength of character or moral fiber to acknowledge you are wrong.

I suspect that it is at the foundation of EVERY Trump supporter. They simply CANNOT acknowledge being wrong, so they continue to support a disgusting abomination rather than do so.

Okay. That is your right. At least it is for now.

The cement-headed Germans who supported Hitler were well within their right to do so also...IN THE BEGINNING. Then...not so much.

I hope this disgusting piece of garbage is removed from the White House before we get to that point.

 

[Bigdog]

Dog...you are full of shit...and apparently do not have the strength of character or moral fiber to acknowledge you are wrong.

I suspect that it is at the foundation of EVERY Trump supporter. They simply CANNOT acknowledge being wrong, so they continue to support a disgusting abomination rather than do so.

Okay. That is your right. At least it is for now.

The cement-headed Germans who supported Hitler were well within their right to do so also...IN THE BEGINNING. Then...not so much.

I hope this disgusting piece of garbage is removed from the White House before we get to that point.

I have you boxed in, Frank.

If you disagree with Vindman, you destroy 1/2 the main testimony. If you agree with Vindman, you owe me an apology.

What's it gonna be Frank. More whining like a bitch, or will you take a stand like a man.

 

[Ross Dolan]

I have you boxed in, Frank.

If you disagree with Vindman, you destroy 1/2 the main testimony. If you agree with Vindman, you owe me an apology.

What's it gonna be Frank. More whining like a bitch, or will you take a stand like a man.

The only one you have "boxed in", Dog...is yourself. And you are doing a hell of a job of it.

What you want to do is to move all over the place rather than deal with the major item brought up...and that is your totally incorrect assertion.

You wrote: "You are the one claiming that an obvious threat was made in the phone call."

I defied you to find any post of mine where I said an obvious threat was made in the phone call.

You have not met that challenge, mostly because I never said it.

And now you are contorting yourself trying to pretend I did by proxy of some sort...because you do not have the strength of character or moral fiber to acknowledge you are wrong.

So be it. You are a Trump supporter...and I do not expect any Trump supporter to have strength of character or moral fiber.

Deal with it.

 

[Bigdog]

The only one you have "boxed in", Dog...is yourself. And you are doing a hell of a job of it.

What you want to do is to move all over the place rather than deal with the major item brought up...and that is your totally incorrect assertion.

So whine like a bitch it is.

If your going to cite "the testimony" as your position, you should know what's in it, first. Hope you learned your lesson.