Sins of the father... don't punish the kid
What kids are being punished? Scarecrows love their strawmen.
Sins of the father... don't punish the kid
What kids are being punished? Scarecrows love their strawmen.![]()
https://www.wlwt.com/article/school...w-be-against-the-law-in-california-1/29450743
read this and then comment.
You seriously want little kids emotionally scarred for want of $40 in a food account? You want them malnourished?
The fiscal impact of paying for school lunches for poor parent's kids has got to be nil. And you, sitting judgment
in tumbleweed connection in Kansas have a problem if OUR duly elected governor and legislature decide NOT
to be assholes? You think that is any of your business. You want to dictate ASSHOLENESS for California? Die quickly,
deplorable Trumptards.
Let’s put this lie by the left to bed.
Not one post on this thread says to punish the children...not one.
Irresponsibility has been addressed...many times.
One wonders how many of these “compassionate” posters practice what they preach.
What are foodstamps for if not to see that poor people are able to eat ?
It wants them malnourished so they can't compete in life.
Scarecrows love their strawmen.![]()
I know, in leftist dumbfuck land, turning them into indoctrinated dependent wards of the state is a better outcome.![]()
Many of those on food stamps (EBT) also have kids that qualify for free school lunch. Redundancy seems to be a problem. If the family is receiving funds through food stamps to buy food, why are they also receiving free lunch?
Exactly. How many times do they have to buy that vote ?
CFM considers his 2 cents of property taxes allocated for school lunches for poor kids to be punishment.
You should consider it a privilege, hate shit.
Scarecrows not only love their strawmen, but continue to not grasp the point being made. Do you believe that not addressing the core issues that are the cause is a good idea?
If people cannot even afford to feed their children, why are they having them? If we ignore why they are having them, we will create more dependency and subsequent poverty.
But I get it; the Democratic Party of the Jackass can only survive if it race hustles, divides our nation and creates a dependency class of ignorant voters who demand Government services.
I your world, handjob, if the parents commit a crime, we send their children to jail.
Have you no decency?
I for one have no problem with the school system providing lunch for children. We have been doing it for decades why get your panties in a wad now?
What is decent about creating a Government dependent class of citizens on the backs of those who work?
https://www.wlwt.com/article/school...w-be-against-the-law-in-california-1/29450743
read this and then comment.
You seriously want little kids emotionally scarred for want of $40 in a food account? You want them malnourished?
The fiscal impact of paying for school lunches for poor parent's kids has got to be nil. And you, sitting judgment
in tumbleweed connection in Kansas have a problem if OUR duly elected governor and legislature decide NOT
to be assholes? You think that is any of your business. You want to dictate ASSHOLENESS for California? Die quickly,
deplorable Trumptards.
I for one have no problem with the school system providing lunch for children. We have been doing it for decades why get your panties in a wad now?
If they are poor they qualify for free groceries.
I agree schools should drop cafeterias altogether. Needless expense.