School lunch shaming will now be against the law in California

Let’s put this lie by the left to bed.

Not one post on this thread says to punish the children...not one.

Irresponsibility has been addressed...many times.

One wonders how many of these “compassionate” posters practice what they preach.
 
https://www.wlwt.com/article/school...w-be-against-the-law-in-california-1/29450743

read this and then comment.

You seriously want little kids emotionally scarred for want of $40 in a food account? You want them malnourished?
The fiscal impact of paying for school lunches for poor parent's kids has got to be nil. And you, sitting judgment
in tumbleweed connection in Kansas have a problem if OUR duly elected governor and legislature decide NOT
to be assholes? You think that is any of your business. You want to dictate ASSHOLENESS for California? Die quickly,
deplorable Trumptards.

What are foodstamps for if not to see that poor people are able to eat ?
 
Let’s put this lie by the left to bed.

Not one post on this thread says to punish the children...not one.

Irresponsibility has been addressed...many times.

One wonders how many of these “compassionate” posters practice what they preach.

Since their compassion comes from thinking paying taxes is the same as voluntary doing it on your own without being told, none.
 
Scarecrows love their strawmen. :rolleyes:

I know, in leftist dumbfuck land, turning them into indoctrinated dependent wards of the state is a better outcome. :rolleyes:

Isn't is safe to say that irresponsible parents teaching their kids that it's OK to force someone else to feed them capable of doing far more harm to those kids than holding their irresponsible parents accountable for their failures?

Maybe Micawber thinks creating multi-generational welfare leeches is better than teaching them it's not OK to be one.
 
Many of those on food stamps (EBT) also have kids that qualify for free school lunch. Redundancy seems to be a problem. If the family is receiving funds through food stamps to buy food, why are they also receiving free lunch?

Exactly. How many times do they have to buy that vote ?
 
CFM considers his 2 cents of property taxes allocated for school lunches for poor kids to be punishment.
You should consider it a privilege, hate shit.

Scarecrows not only love their strawmen, but continue to not grasp the point being made. Do you believe that not addressing the core issues that are the cause is a good idea?

If people cannot even afford to feed their children, why are they having them? If we ignore why they are having them, we will create more dependency and subsequent poverty.

But I get it; the Democratic Party of the Jackass can only survive if it race hustles, divides our nation and creates a dependency class of ignorant voters who demand Government services.
 
Scarecrows not only love their strawmen, but continue to not grasp the point being made. Do you believe that not addressing the core issues that are the cause is a good idea?

If people cannot even afford to feed their children, why are they having them? If we ignore why they are having them, we will create more dependency and subsequent poverty.

But I get it; the Democratic Party of the Jackass can only survive if it race hustles, divides our nation and creates a dependency class of ignorant voters who demand Government services.

He made two big mistakes in his post. First, he has no clue how much I pay in taxes and secondly, he still thinks it's about the amount.
 
This nation is the most charitable nation on earth.

Not only do we feed our own, we feed people around the world and provide security and aid for nations around the world.

America is always there in time of natural disasters and need,
 
I for one have no problem with the school system providing lunch for children. We have been doing it for decades why get your panties in a wad now?

The school system isn't providing it. The TAXPAYERS are.

What makes you think that now is the only time it's been addressed? Are you OK with freeloading, irresponsible parents not doing the job of feeding THEIR kids?
 
https://www.wlwt.com/article/school...w-be-against-the-law-in-california-1/29450743

read this and then comment.

You seriously want little kids emotionally scarred for want of $40 in a food account? You want them malnourished?
The fiscal impact of paying for school lunches for poor parent's kids has got to be nil. And you, sitting judgment
in tumbleweed connection in Kansas have a problem if OUR duly elected governor and legislature decide NOT
to be assholes? You think that is any of your business. You want to dictate ASSHOLENESS for California? Die quickly,
deplorable Trumptards.

Strawman; why do you think your can lie to support your Fascistic world view? Any child born to parents who cannot afford to even feed them is already going to be emotionally scarred. Why do you make excuses for irresponsible people who have children out of wedlock so that they can go on welfare?
 
I for one have no problem with the school system providing lunch for children. We have been doing it for decades why get your panties in a wad now?

It's not about the school system providing lunch; we have always had school lunch rooms. The issue now is forcing taxpayers to fund others school lunches.

What is responsible about having kids if you can't even afford the $2.50 for their lunch? Why should the Government be in the job of ensuring kids eat?
 
Back
Top