Polling Shows That On Health Costs, ObamaCare Was A Massive Failure

Incorrect. Try rereading. I have not said I'm claiming nothing. In fact, I expressly claimed that two ways of analyzing this issue were stupid, and I claimed another way of analyzing the issue wouldn't be. If you want the data, though, here's a start:

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/HLTHSCPCHCSA

We don't have the most recent data, but we do have four years of data following the implementation of Obamacare, and ten years leading up to Obamacare. So, what's the rate of per capita health expenditure growth, annualized, for each period? This is not a difficult math problem, but I'm betting it's one you don't have a clue how to solve.

You keep posting but say nothing and add nothing to the conversation. What is it you are trying to say other than nothing snowflake? You do that a lot. Post a lot of words lacking any point.
 
Um...why would soaring health care costs be identified as the top concern of the American people if the "Affordable" Care Act were lowering costs like it claimed it would rather than exploding them, exactly as conservatives (apparently the only people involved with any kind of basic economic literacy) said would happen from the beginning?

Duh.

GetAttachmentThumbnail

Liberals; they really are THAT fucking dumb. :laugh:
 
There's a lot of "duh" packed into that question, so give me a moment to unpack it for you.

First, obviously, what the top listed political concern at the moment is depends a lot on what other problems there are at the moment. In a year with a big terrorist attack, that'll jump to the top of the list. In a year when we're in a recession, or just coming out of one, that will. If hundreds of American GIs are coming home from wars in body bags, that'll be near the top of the list. Right now, and for the last five years or so, things have been going pretty well, which cuts down on the competition for top political concerns, and allows more focus on things that would be more back-burner items in times of crisis.

Second, again obviously, what topics people are focused on depends a lot on what topics the media are focusing on. Some years, the media will focus a lot on, say, mass shootings, or some other trendy topic. Often that has little to do with what's actually going on, statistically. For example, illegal immigration is down in recent years -- from about 12.2 million unauthorized immigrants in 2006 to somewhere around 10.7 million now (according to the Pew Research Center). Yet immigration has crept up the list of topics people are focusing on, because nativist scaremongers have really focused on it. If Trump were to spend his days tweeting about failing infrastructure, and hyping every deadly accident that could be attributed to poor infrastructure maintenance, the media would follow suit, and infrastructure would rise on the list of things people want Congress to focus on, without any change in the situation to justify the change in priorities. Right now, there are a lot of stories about medical costs, even though they're rising more slowly than normal, so that's risen on the list of things people want Congress to focus on.

As for the idea that Obamacare is "exploding" costs, that's untrue. Turns out healthcare spending has been rising considerably more slowly since Obamacare became law than in the years leading up to it:

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/HLTHSCPCHCSA

Now that you realize that, would you care to revise your opinion?

You must bore a lot of people at parties. Let me simplify the above meaningless post:

giphy.gif
 
Obama never said it would reduce costs overall...he said it would stem the tide of rising costs so that they grow at a lower rate.

Liar; what is it about you idiots on the left and your propensity to spew nothing but lies? Fucking moron; what is he saying here:

Obama Promises To Lower Health Insurance Premiums by $2,500 Per Year

He did lower the out-of-pocket costs for many families because they qualify for subsidies.

So let me understand this liberal math; so everyone is paying HIGHER costs except those who get care on the backs of taxpayers. SHUT UP! :laugh:

If you want to actually lower health care costs, you have to get rid of private insurance companies first, and then you have to let the single payer bargain for cheaper drug costs.

What a stupid and moronic claim. It is obvious you don't know what you are talking about. Insurance companies INSURE by pooling costs. You have low use insured and high use insured. They also use their membership POWER to negotiate rates with the providers of health care.

Now, if you want to place all that into the hands of incompetent politicians and government bureaucrats who will lower costs by LIMITING care and having long wait times, then you will LOVE living in Kanukistan. You're a LIAR and a FOOL.
 
I've given you a link that proved my point on cost.

Wrong; you gave me a partisan blog attempting to make the moronic argument that Government managed systems are less costly. That is a LIE.

If you can't at least begin by accepting that then I'm wasting my time with you and there's no need for me to get into all the 'if's, 'ands', or 'buts', you will raise. About all I will say or need to say is that ours is rated as better than the US system. Have a nice day.

Yes, you are definitely wasting your time trying to lie and make the case for Government managed anything with me. I'm not a low IQ dupe like you who has been brain washed into thinking that becoming a ward of the State is an awesome idea.

As for "ands' and "buts"; that' coming from idiots like you who think living under the thumb of Government regulations is awesome.
 
Let's look at some FACTS about the vaunted awesome Canadian system Montgomery loves so much and wants to make America just as shitty as his:

Canada's single-payer healthcare system forced over 1 million patients to wait for necessary medical treatments last year. That's an all-time record.
Those long wait times were more than just a nuisance; they cost patients $1.9 billion in lost wages, according to a new report by the Fraser Institute, a Vancouver-based think-tank.
Lengthy treatment delays are the norm in Canada and other single-payer nations, which ration care to keep costs down. Yet more and more Democratic leaders are pushing for a single-payer system -- and more and more voters are clamoring for one.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/sallyp...e-waiting-for-medical-treatment/#1a02fb63e7d5

I am betting those moron propaganda blogs don't account for this cost do they?

MORE:

By his own admission, Sen. Sanders' "Medicare for All" bill is modeled on Canada's healthcare system. On a fact-finding trip to Canada last fall, Sanders praised the country for "guaranteeing health care to all people," noting that "there is so much to be learned" from the Canadian system.

The only thing Canadian patients are "guaranteed" is a spot on a waitlist. As the Fraser report notes, in 2017, more than 173,000 patients waited for an ophthalmology procedure. Another 91,000 lined up for some form of general surgery, while more than 40,000 waited for a urology procedure.

All told, nearly 3 percent of Canada's population was waiting for some kind of medical care at the end of last year.

Those delays were excruciatingly long. After receiving a referral from a general practitioner, the typical patient waited more than 21 weeks to receive treatment from a specialist. That was the longest average waiting period on record -- and more than double the median wait in 1993.
 
You are aware that just saying things doesn't make them true, right? They actually need to match something in reality.

Step 1: Impose an illegal, trillion-dollar health care takeover designed to obliterate insurance companies and leave nothing standing but the nanny state to pick up the pieces.

Step 2: When the train wreck you created begins, blame everything on "not enough government."

Hence:

-you couldn't keep your doctor (happened before the GOP took over)
-skyrocketing costs (happened before the GOP took over)
-you couldn't keep your insurance (happened before the GOP took over)
-illegal immigrants got taxpayer-funded Obamacare coverage, just as conservatives were crucified for warning against (happened before the GOP took over)
-astronomical explosion of debt (happened before the GOP took over)
-Obamacare really did fund abortions, contrary to everything we were told (happened before the GOP took over)

...and on, and on.

Please stop lying about this.

GetAttachmentThumbnail

ROFL!!

Even though I explained WHY certain things happened regarding the ACA, you immediately begin whining about how I'm saying things that aren't true.

Then you turn right around and do just what you told me not do do!

Here you are, saying things that aren't true:

-you couldn't keep your doctor (happened before the GOP took over)
-skyrocketing costs (happened before the GOP took over)
-you couldn't keep your insurance (happened before the GOP took over)
-illegal immigrants got taxpayer-funded Obamacare coverage, just as conservatives were crucified for warning against (happened before the GOP took over)
-astronomical explosion of debt (happened before the GOP took over)
-Obamacare really did fund abortions, contrary to everything we were told (happened before the GOP took over)

Typical GOP hypocrisy.
 
Wrong; you gave me a partisan blog attempting to make the moronic argument that Government managed systems are less costly. That is a LIE.



Yes, you are definitely wasting your time trying to lie and make the case for Government managed anything with me. I'm not a low IQ dupe like you who has been brain washed into thinking that becoming a ward of the State is an awesome idea.

As for "ands' and "buts"; that' coming from idiots like you who think living under the thumb of Government regulations is awesome.

I like your spirit! You're like a felled tree that is refusing to fall because it's entangled in the branches of the other trees. You're just different because you are entangled in the brainwashing to accept 'The American Way'.

Yes, the facts that can be ascertained on hundreds of websites that look at statistics are just partisan blog lies!

We're done.
 
Nah. I'm considered charming. So, have you figured out how to solve the simple math problem I posed yet?

I haven't seen that; I see a boorish person prone to blathering and who has a misplaced high self opinion. You must arrive after everyone has passed out. :laugh:
 
ROFL!!
Even though I explained WHY certain things happened regarding the ACA, you immediately begin whining about how I'm saying things that aren't true.
Then you turn right around and do just what you told me not do do!
Here you are, saying things that aren't true:
Typical GOP hypocrisy.

ZappasTard Translator:

giphy.gif
 
I like your spirit! You're like a felled tree that is refusing to fall because it's entangled in the branches of the other trees. You're just different because you are entangled in the brainwashing to accept 'The American Way'.

Yes, the facts that can be ascertained on hundreds of websites that look at statistics are just partisan blog lies!

We're done.

You don't come armed with facts; you came with propaganda and denial. Cry harder bitch. :laugh:
 
So far, from your article, I haven't seen ONE thing where Trump or the Congress have prevented anyone from enrolling. Perhaps you could cut and paste the exact passage that says Republicans are preventing enrollment. I can't seem to find it.

By the way, did you know that Chuck Smith-Dewey is a leftist cartoonist with ZERO experience working in, around or on healthcare industry things other than his personal Opinions and that this is his BLOG? If this is your source, it is less than credible and laughably stupid. He is also a major campaign donor to the Democratic Party; Al Franken in particular.

Who does Dewey support?

SMITH-DEWEY, CHUCK R LAKEVILLE, MN
55044 Healthinsurance.Org/Ceo $5 08/17/2016 P AL FRANKEN FOR SENATE - Democrat
SMITH-DEWEY, CHUCK R LAKEVILLE, MN
55044 Healthinsurance.Org/Ceo $5 08/17/2016 P AL FRANKEN FOR SENATE - Democrat
SMITH-DEWEY, CHUCK LAKEVILLE, MN
55044 Healthinsurance.Org Llc/Ceo And Founder $2,000 08/14/2016 P MINNESOTA DEMOCRATIC-FARMER-LABOR PARTY - Democrat Farm Labor
SMITH-DEWEY, CHUCK R LAKEVILLE, MN
55044 Healthinsurance.Org/Ceo $5 08/14/2016 P AL FRANKEN FOR SENATE - Democrat
SMITH-DEWEY, CHUCK R LAKEVILLE, MN
55044 Healthinsurance.Org/Ceo $50 07/25/2016 P AL FRANKEN FOR SENATE - Democrat
SMITH-DEWEY, CHUCK LAKEVILLE, MN
55044 Pounce/Ceo $2,700 10/27/2015 P ACTBLUE
SMITH-DEWEY, CHUCK LAKEVILLE, MN
55044 Self/Web Developer $2,700 10/27/2015 G ANGIE CRAIG FOR CONGRESS - Democrat
SMITH-DEWEY, CHUCK LAKEVILLE, MN
55044 Pounce/Artist $1,690 08/26/2015 P HILLARY FOR AMERICA - Democrat
SMITH-DEWEY, CHUCK LAKEVILLE, MN
55044 Pounce/Artist $1,000 08/26/2015 P HILLARY FOR AMERICA - Democrat
SMITH-DEWEY, CHUCK LAKEVILLE, MN
55044 Pounce/Artist $1,010 08/26/2015 G HILLARY FOR AMERICA - Democrat
SMITH-DEWEY, CHUCK LAKEVILLE, MN
55044 Pounce/Ceo $2,700 06/24/2015 P ACTBLUE
SMITH-DEWEY, CHUCK LAKEVILLE, MN
55044 Self/Web Developer $2,700 06/24/2015 P ANGIE CRAIG FOR CONGRESS - Democrat




Would you take a source of mine seriously if it was a right wing blogger with ZERO experience in the particular industry we are debating? I doubt it. So stop the little bitch act.

Would you take a source of mine seriously if it was a right wing blogger with ZERO experience in the particular industry we are debating? I doubt it. So stop the little bitch act.[/QUOTE]

I certainly called it when I said you'd NEVER accept the truths in the article I cited.

The article clearly spells out how the GOP controlled congress year after year attempted to derail the ACA, and yet you claim you can't see one thing they did.

There truly are none so blind as those who refuse to see.
 
Liberals want us to be like Canada?

Waiting Your Turn: Wait Times for Health Care in Canada, 2017 Report

Waiting for treatment has become a defining characteristic of Canadian health care. In order to document the lengthy queues for visits to specialists and for diagnostic and surgical procedures in the country, the Fraser Institute has—for over two decades—surveyed specialist physicians across 12 specialties and 10 provinces.

https://www.fraserinstitute.org/studies/waiting-your-turn-wait-times-for-health-care-in-canada-2017
 
Back
Top