Kavanaugh is about to get the Merick Garland treatment!

The Senate will never confirm a SC justice who has that albatross handing over his neck. It would be suicide come the next elections.

Wrong as usual snowflake; they tried to derail Clarence Thomas with lies as well. He is sitting there and doing a great job....I know, he is an uncle Tom aint he snowflake? Those darn blacks who don't styat on the Democratic Plantation; what to do with them right?
 
While 65 women who knew Kavanaugh in high school have come forward to vouch for his character as a gentleman, Ford's lone word is the only claim against him. Heck, there are more testimonials as to Ford’s alleged insanity than there are regarding Kavanaugh’s alleged impropriety.
 
Oh, don't worry about Republicans. If they have one thing down to an art, it's how to destroy someone's character.

Ironic and stupid; the people who play that game always are the liberal left, the FAKE media and Democratic Party of the Jackass snowflake. STFU, seriously. You have ZERO credibility.
 
Wrong as usual snowflake; they tried to derail Clarence Thomas with lies as well. He is sitting there and doing a great job....I know, he is an uncle Tom aint he snowflake? Those darn blacks who don't styat on the Democratic Plantation; what to do with them right?

In case you haven't notice, the world has changed since Clarence Thomas. Now we have the year of the woman and the me too movement. No Senator will take that lightly.
 
This woman must be taken seriously and given her chance to testify before the Senate. If her story is believable and compelling, he will never be confirmed.

No she doesn't. If she didn't come forward 40 years ago, if she didn't come forward over ten years ago when Kavanaugh was confirmed to the Federal bench, then she doesn't get to slander anyone now with unsupported, less than credible accusations today.
 
How do you know it's a lie?

because I am not a simpleton retard.

But it's immaterial what I think, I am addressing jarods state of mind in this thread. Jarod says he doesn't like what the dems are doing, which implies he doens't believe the woman, because if he did believe her, he'd find the actions of the democrats prudent and necessary. Thus one can only conclude that jarod finds this to be poetic justice in spite of the fact he doesn't believe the accusations and is ok with future allegations of sexual assault/rape/abuse being doubted and undermined for political purposes.
 
How do you know it was rape???????? Let me guess women don't lie! One would think after the Duke lacrosse case you lefties would have learned your lesson.

it seems as though you might have you mind made up already. At lets hear what she has to say
 
It's a single accuser.

Any voter who looks at this, says "darn those Democrats" and bases their vote on it in November should really have their voter registration revoked.

Spoken like a true Fascist snowflake. It is a specious political stunt. Any voter who votes for despicable Democrats should have their voter registration revoked and sent to a mental institution for observation.
 
because I am not a simpleton retard.

But it's immaterial what I think, I am addressing jarods state of mind in this thread. Jarod says he doesn't like what the dems are doing, which implies he doens't believe the woman, because if he did believe her, he'd find the actions prudent and neccesary. Thus one can only conclude that jarod finds this to be poetic justice in spite of the fact he doesn't believe the accusations and is ok with future allegations of sexual assault/rape/abuse being doubted and undermined for political purposes.

Okay. None of that is relevant to the veracity of the accuser.
 
Both sides do this kind of instant character destruction. People who know nothing about her or what happened don't hesitate to call her a liar & all that.

Same thing happened w/ Anita Hill, and there were corroborating stories w/ Thomas.

I think people underestimate what's involved for the accusers to go public w/ this kind of thing. It's hardly something that's easy to do.

This is a LIE and LAME; when have the Republicans ever pulled a stunt like this for a Supreme Court nominee.....name it you laughable clown.
 
Only Fox devotees are making this a party thing.

I don't think it makes Dems look one way or another. Do you have any evidence that this is a "stunt" and that they put her up to it somehow? You are actually the one sounding delusional.

This is really stupid as well; only Fox is accurately reporting this. MSNBC and CNN clowns have already prosecuted Kavanaugh in the court of Low information public opinion.
 
Put aside everything for a second. IF it's true - if someone tried to commit rape, even in high school - you don't think that's relevant, even for consideration? Set aside whether it's a complete disqualifier...you don't think it should even be part of what the committee weighs & considers?

If it came out with absolute proof kavanaugh hard core raped someone, I'd still put him on the bench. Can't take the chance with november coming up. The democrats currently have a 1 in 3 shot to take the senate which is the same chances trump had of winning in 2016. Totally possible. I am not going to let the leftists sabotage the court. The court is everything, and raping chicks doesn't prevent you from interpreting the constitution correctly. The court is everything, no excuses.

I am the only honest person on JPP. I don't care if he murdered someone if he can get away with it. I want originalists on the court, period, because democrats are domestic enemies of the constitution, and this is bigger than any one individual.

Now, if the democrats acted morally and brought this to attention earlier, I would be ok with rescinding his nomination (if it wasn't obvious lies and bullshit) and finding someone else. But now it's too late.
 
Kavanaugh should not only be withdrawn from consideration for SCOTUS, but should also be removed from the Appellate bench as well for lying to Congress.

Typically SCOTUS nominees galvanize the party and consolidate party support. The opposite seems to be the case with Kavanaugh the Rapist.
 
Put aside everything for a second. IF it's true - if someone tried to commit rape, even in high school - you don't think that's relevant, even for consideration? Set aside whether it's a complete disqualifier...you don't think it should even be part of what the committee weighs & considers?

Absent any history of serial abuse, and given the respective ages and circumstances at the time of the alleged incident—I would dismiss it.
 
Back
Top