Eagle_Eye
Well-known member
Why dont you go with the excuse, that every one does it, so its no big deal? That should be all you need!
Because the truth is teen age boys will always try to get laid.
Why dont you go with the excuse, that every one does it, so its no big deal? That should be all you need!
dumbass Trump chumps thought they had Kav in the bag
nope, send the shameful piece of shit home on a bus
now, stop putting everything else aside and ask yourself.........why isn't it obvious to you that it isn't likely to be true?......
Let her testify, if it helps her heal. She's apparently suffered all these years....
It shouldn't impact the confirmation though....should it?
Because the truth is teen age boys will always try to get laid.
if you gotta make this into politics, think of it as a pay back for Merrick Garland.
How does this affect Democrats? It's a single accuser.
deoends on how much money the DNC is willing to spend to hire them......
I guess you don't know what "concluded to be lies" means.
Whatever happens, the Buffoon's behaviour has ensured that the Republican Party is finished as a principled political group. The only real question is whether the fatman will bring down American democracy with it.
so basically you are saying that since the demmycrats didn't have the votes to actually give payback for Garland they had to make up some shit at the last minute like they did with Moore?......
Teen age boys will always get laid without raping a woman
Maybe its not true, let hear what this woman has to say. I am sure there will be several versions of her testimony
Exactly..but I say let her be "interviewed"....it should be very interesting....Why didn't she come forth when he was nominated and sent to the Federal bench? Are liberals saying that it is okay for the Federal Courts just not for the Supreme Court? What a load of partisan crapola.
She doesn't deserve to be heard now, ten years ago or even thirty. If she was so egregiously treated, she should have come forward then.
I am sorry, but women do not have the right to throw around unsubstantiated/uncorroborated claims for political purposes 10, 20, 30 or 50 years later.
I couldn't care less what you and your kind believe.
not if she's carefully rehearsed.......
not if she's carefully rehearsed.......
I swear - stuff like this brings out the worst in the......
Ms. Ford contacted the Washington Post back in July when Kavanaugh's name first came up as a nominee for SCOTUS. Apparently she was reluctant though to give an on-the-record interview at that time. As others have pointed out, obviously Kavanaugh and his handlers were aware of *something* as they had time to track down former h.s. classmates -- dozens of them -- to testify that he was just the greatest guy ever.
https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/16/politics/christine-blasey-ford-brett-kavanaugh/index.html