Something wonderful is happening. And liberals are furious about it.

I see she's given up following Frank around the forum and scolding him and latched on to you. It's like having a piece of used toilet paper stuck to your shoe all day.

It's always funny to watch a racist stalker claim that she is "caring" and "humane." But then she has also claimed to be an ex-teacher. A "teacher" who refers to "inner city" students as "thugs."

Of little to no consequence.
Just another self absorbed Trumptard psychopath.
We have several here. I'm sure you noticed.
 
I'll be happy to comment on how Trump is saving Americans tons of money (he isn't, you know*), as soon as you can show some data verifying your claim.

* http://www.usdebtclock.org/

* Look at the upper left hand corner -- U.S. National Debt, then scan just to its right at U.S. Federal Tax Revenue. Tell us which one is growing faster than the other.

Funny Bowel you never worried about the US debt during the 8 years of Obama, why is that? Oh liberal debt is better than conservative debt. GOT IT.
 
Funny Bowel you never worried about the US debt during the 8 years of Obama, why is that? Oh liberal debt is better than conservative debt. GOT IT.

Isn't the debt and deficit spending an existential cornerstone of conservative principals, Grampy?
 
Funny Bowel you never worried about the US debt during the 8 years of Obama, why is that? Oh liberal debt is better than conservative debt. GOT IT.

Debt is never a good thing but let’s add a little historical perspective.

Obama had the stimulus spending bonanza that began shortly after he came into office. I wasn’t here at the time but I’m confident there wasn’t a peep from Owl or other JPP lefties about the debt lol.

Regarding the economy generally, the recovery began in 2009, prior to the stimulus. Obama got help from the Federal Reserve and there’s nothing wrong with that—except for the fact Obama can’t take credit for Federal Reserve actions. Another point that gets lost is that market economies rebound by their very nature: when Obama came into office the economy was at rock bottom and there was only one way for it to go—it went up.

But subtract the Feds actions and the only conclusion one can fairly draw is that Obama’s *policies* led to the weakest recovery of the last 50 years or better. We could have had the ‘Trump economy’ well before the end of Obama’s first term—but for Obama’s policies.

That Obama would try and take credit for it now is both laughable and predictable.
 
Debt is never a good thing but let’s add a little historical perspective.

Obama had the stimulus spending bonanza that began shortly after he came into office. I wasn’t here at the time but I’m confident there wasn’t a peep from Owl or other JPP lefties about the debt lol.

Regarding the economy generally, the recovery began in 2009, prior to the stimulus. Obama got help from the Federal Reserve and there’s nothing wrong with that—except for the fact Obama can’t take credit for Federal Reserve actions. Another point that gets lost is that market economies rebound by their very nature: when Obama came into office the economy was at rock bottom and there was only one way for it to go—it went up.

But subtract the Feds actions and the only conclusion one can fairly draw is that Obama’s *policies* led to the weakest recovery of the last 50 years or better. We could have had the ‘Trump economy’ well before the end of Obama’s first term—but for Obama’s policies.

That Obama would try and take credit for it now is both laughable and predictable.
So , you must be really angry at Trump helping bail out the farmers because of his tariffs.

If Obama and Congress hadn’t bailed out industries where do you think we would be today?
 
So , you must be really angry at Trump helping bail out the farmers because of his tariffs.

If Obama and Congress hadn’t bailed out industries where do you think we would be today?

He didn’t bail out an industry—he bailed out weak competitors.

But I’ll grant it’s an interesting question.
 
Isn't the debt and deficit spending an existential cornerstone of conservative principals, Grampy?

Then why weren't you lefties whining about the debt under Obama? Debt is either good or bad, you can't have it both ways.
 
Last edited:
Then why are you lefties whining about the debt under Trump? Debt is either good or bad, you can't have it both ways.

Debt is bad lol.

But, Trump inherited a bunch of it from his immediate predecessors. He’s only into his second year of office and he [his policies, actually] deserves a chance to alleviate it. It’s not going to go away over night. The new tax laws are just now beginning to take effect, for example.

I’ll give it another year, at least, before I’ll get on him about it.
 
Debt is bad lol.

But, Trump inherited a bunch of it from his immediate predecessors. He’s only into his second year of office and he [his policies, actually] deserves a chance to alleviate it. It’s not going to go away over night. The new tax laws are just now beginning to take effect, for example.

I’ll give it another year, at least, before I’ll get on him about it.

I'm not getting on Trump for the debt the lefties are. In fact the debt dropped 100 billion in Trumps first year. But the left will give the credit to Obama.
 
I'm not getting on Trump for the debt the lefties are. In fact the debt dropped 100 billion in Trumps first year. But the left will give the credit to Obama.

I was trying not to be ‘situational’ about debt lol.

Trump’s approach is right: get the economy fired up first then go after the debt. If more people are working that means there are less people on food stamps and government assistance. At some point spending will need to be addressed but not before the economy has had time to fully recover.
 
He didn’t bail out an industry—he bailed out weak competitors.

But I’ll grant it’s an interesting question.
Sorry, I disagree, if you think recovery was slow with the bailout, it would have been no recovery without it. It’s hilarious us you all think recovery was slow under Obama but humming along under Trump when statistics show that isn’t true.
 
Sorry, I disagree, if you think recovery was slow with the bailout, it would have been no recovery without it. It’s hilarious us you all think recovery was slow under Obama but humming along under Trump when statistics show that isn’t true.

What’s hilarious is a president trying to claim the economy of the next president—two years after leaving office lol!

I knew Obama wouldn’t stay gone, btw. The subtle narcissist that he is.
 
What’s hilarious is a president trying to claim the economy of the next president—two years after leaving office lol!

I knew Obama wouldn’t stay gone, btw. The subtle narcissist that he is.
It started under Obama, but your so dishonest you won’t give him credit, all you Trumpeteers cried about the economy till it became Trump’s, then suddenly it became amazing. It just shows how bad your cranial inversion is.
 
It started under Obama, but your so dishonest you won’t give him credit, all you Trumpeteers cried about the economy till it became Trump’s, then suddenly it became amazing. It just shows how bad your cranial inversion is.

Take Obama out of the equation.

We have a market economy that crashes and it hits rock bottom. *Left on its own* the economy is going to recover to whatever extent. Presidents have a limited ability to affect the economy. It’s a great partisan talking point, but Bush II didn’t single handedly cause the Great Recession lol. Bush has plenty of help from democrats and from factors beyond anyone’s control.

As mentioned, Obama got help from the Feds. Which is fine, the Feds need to step in from time to time—but Obama can’t take credit for actions on the Feds part. Obama and congress get credit for the stimulus [assuming one thinks stimulus bills are a good thing] but it’s goofy to think a ten year old stimulus package is helping Trump’s economy lol.

And whatever benefit derived from the stimulus spending was mitigated by Obama’s addiction to regulatory measures. That’s why the recovery was so sluggish—it should have rebounded much faster. The media was doing its best to tell people how well they were doing in Obama’s economy but many voters weren’t buying it.

It’s a big reason Trump won the election.
 
Your probably months away from prison.
Enjoy your freedom while you have it, Jesus freak.

Prison wouldn't bother me one bit. They can put me in prison, torture me, even kill me. I'll have the last laugh. I'll be in Heaven with my Father. And YOU will still be on your way to the lake of fire. You poor fool.
 
Take Obama out of the equation.

We have a market economy that crashes and it hits rock bottom. *Left on its own* the economy is going to recover to whatever extent. Presidents have a limited ability to affect the economy. It’s a great partisan talking point, but Bush II didn’t single handedly cause the Great Recession lol. Bush has plenty of help from democrats and from factors beyond anyone’s control.

As mentioned, Obama got help from the Feds. Which is fine, the Feds need to step in from time to time—but Obama can’t take credit for actions on the Feds part. Obama and congress get credit for the stimulus [assuming one thinks stimulus bills are a good thing] but it’s goofy to think a ten year old stimulus package is helping Trump’s economy lol.

And whatever benefit derived from the stimulus spending was mitigated by Obama’s addiction to regulatory measures. That’s why the recovery was so sluggish—it should have rebounded much faster. The media was doing its best to tell people how well they were doing in Obama’s economy but many voters weren’t buying it.

It’s a big reason Trump won the election.
Lol, you can’t take Obama out of the equation. His policies started the recovery, now Trumps trying to wreck it. That’s what Republicans do.
 
Back
Top