Latest on Climate Change

The Scientific Method, as you are attempting to describe, relies on empirical evidence and the principle of falsifiability not climate models. I refer you to the truly outstanding lecture entitled Cargo Cult Science given by the inestimable Richard Feynman way back 1974. Without doubt if he were alive today he'd have a field day ripping climate pseudo-science apart.




Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk

Sorry Luddite, but computer
Modeling is now an integral part of all science. You should know this given you pose as a computer expert anonymously online. Stop lying in the name of purity.
 
Here is the greatest living physicist on the subject.

http://bigthink.com/devils-advocate/freeman-dyson-climate-change-predictions-are-absurd

Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk

Here we go again, a Flat Earther finds an opinion and pushes it regardless of the fact that the overwhelming opinion of all Scientists disagree, as if one view cancels all the others

And the Scientist doesn't blanketly negate climate change nor man's contribution

https://www.edge.org/conversation/heretical-thoughts-about-science-and-society
 
Here we go again, a Flat Earther finds an opinion and pushes it regardless of the fact that the overwhelming opinion of all Scientists disagree, as if one view cancels all the others

And the Scientist doesn't blanketly negate climate change nor man's contribution

https://www.edge.org/conversation/heretical-thoughts-about-science-and-society

If one is to appeal to authority he should find an authority. Maybe even one who has actually performed even a single experiment or study of climate science. Better yet one published to peer review and agreed with.

I suppose an old naysaying third base heckler is all he can scrounge off the Internet.
 
Here we go again, a Flat Earther finds an opinion and pushes it regardless of the fact that the overwhelming opinion of all Scientists disagree, as if one view cancels all the others

And the Scientist doesn't blanketly negate climate change nor man's contribution

https://www.edge.org/conversation/heretical-thoughts-about-science-and-society
Nor do many people you ignorant fuckwit. Can you show where I've ever denied an anthropogenic component to CO2 climate sensitivity? Sorry but it is a monumental waste of time talking to idiots like you, I would discuss the science in detail but there is virtually nobody here with even the sketchiest semblance of scientific knowledge. Anyone that resorts to derogatory terms like flat earther and denier is not worthy if any kind of respect.

Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk
 
Nor do many people you ignorant fuckwit. Can you show where I've ever denied an anthropogenic component to CO2 climate sensitivity? Sorry but it is a monumental waste of time talking to idiots like you, I would discuss the science in detail but there is virtually nobody here with even the sketchiest semblance of scientific knowledge. Anyone that resorts to derogatory terms like flat earther and denier is not worthy if any kind of respect.

Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk

Flat earth moron. Go back to performing phrenology on Trumps dick head.
 
Sailor and Aloysius think that you're an ocean going cunt and I agree wholeheartedly.

Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk
Here goes Tom, again, with his grade school tactics! Cracks me up! Next, my dad is better than your dad!
 
Here goes Tom, again, with his grade school tactics! Cracks me up! Next, my dad is better than your dad!

This from the woman that told me to fuck off a week ago, spare me your bullshit Doris. If you don't like me using the word cunt then you might impress me more if you ever took people like Desh to talk for using sexual references constantly. Of course we know that will never happen. I used to wonder why Icedancer called you a hypocrite so much, now I know why.

Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk
 
Again, childish :)
I refer you to the late great Robert Oppenheimer, whose words are so pertinent today. I do find it incredibly odd how the Left is so distrustful of government usually, yet when it comes to climate science they just accept everything without question, mist odd.


“We do not believe any group of men adequate enough or wise enough to operate without scrutiny or without criticism. We know that the only way to avoid error is to detect it, that the only way to detect it is to be free to inquire. We know that in secrecy error undetected will flourish and subvert" –

J Robert Oppenheimer.

Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk
 
I refer you to the late great Robert Oppenheimer, whose words are so pertinent today. I do find it incredibly odd how the Left is so distrustful of government usually, yet when it comes to climate science they just accept everything without question, mist odd.


“We do not believe any group of men adequate enough or wise enough to operate without scrutiny or without criticism. We know that the only way to avoid error is to detect it, that the only way to detect it is to be free to inquire. We know that in secrecy error undetected will flourish and subvert" –

J Robert Oppenheimer.

Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk
This has nothing to do with your school yard antics, which are childish.
 
This has nothing to do with your school yard antics, which are childish.

Really old people sometimes revert to a juvenile state of development. Sad when it happens. It's not his fault. Well, perhaps he doesn't do himself any favors with the whole Korsakoff's deal he is courting.
Prognosis guarded. Offing a fifth of those brown liquor every morning has caught up to him.
 
Nor do many people you ignorant fuckwit. Can you show where I've ever denied an anthropogenic component to CO2 climate sensitivity? Sorry but it is a monumental waste of time talking to idiots like you, I would discuss the science in detail but there is virtually nobody here with even the sketchiest semblance of scientific knowledge. Anyone that resorts to derogatory terms like flat earther and denier is not worthy if any kind of respect.

Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk

That's really kinda humorous, "you ignorant fuckwit," "talking to idiots like you" followed later by "anyone that resorts to derogatory terms .....is not worthy of any kind of respect," beautiful

And you got to love the "I would talk science but you......" You don't talk science, you don't even recognize science, what you and others like you do is find an article, an opinion, a blog, etc., off the Internet, master the semantics involved, and then pound it as gospel. The last thing you do is talk science
 
That's really kinda humorous, "you ignorant fuckwit," "talking to idiots like you" followed later by "anyone that resorts to derogatory terms .....is not worthy of any kind of respect," beautiful

And you got to love the "I would talk science but you......" You don't talk science, you don't even recognize science, what you and others like you do is find an article, an opinion, a blog, etc., off the Internet, master the semantics involved, and then pound it as gospel. The last thing you do is talk science
So I have a 2:1 honours degree in pure chemistry, what are your scientific credentials? I am guessing naff all to bugger all, am I close? Of course, I know that you won't tell me which in itself speaks louder than words.

Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:
Back
Top