Latest on Climate Change

This has nothing to do with your school yard antics, which are childish.
Ok Doris, try dodging the issue again, when have you ever called Desh out for her sexual insults? Oh and by the way, you new hero McAwful has been known to let a few cunts fly from time to time.

Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk
 
Ok Doris, try dodging the issue again, when have you ever called Desh out for her sexual insults? Oh and by the way, you new hero McAwful has been known to let a few cunts fly from time to time.

Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk
Yes, I have, it didn’t help and she doesn’t target me in her comments, you do!
 
Your interest in noted, now fuck off! [emoji8]

Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk
You know, that’s a good idea, back on ignore for awhile, you are rather a broken record these days and a waste of my time!

tata Gladys
 
So I have a 2:1 honours degree in pure chemistry, what are your scientific credentials? I am guessing naff all to bugger all, am I close? Of course, I know that won't tell me which in itself speaks louder than words.

Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk

No I don't have a Science background, but you don't need one to recognize your response pattern, it is pretty predictable among all climate change deniers and especially noticeable with you. It's often called whataboutism

Any time someone posts a climate topic you are going to rebuttal with a piece you found off of a climate denier site which usually isn't related to the specific topic and then ask the other to refute it. If the response is tenfold leaning in the other direction you will continue to ignore such and demand a rebuttal to the specific article you posted. From there it quickly descends to the personal crapola. You don't need Science for that

As I said predictable, and what exactly is "2.1 degree" in anything?
 
Ok Doris, try dodging the issue again, when have you ever called Desh out for her sexual insults? Oh and by the way, you new hero McAwful has been known to let a few cunts fly from time to time.

Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk

Not true.
 
No I don't have a Science background, but you don't need one to recognize your response pattern, it is pretty predictable among all climate change deniers and especially noticeable with you. It's often called whataboutism

Any time someone posts a climate topic you are going to rebuttal with a piece you found off of a climate denier site which usually isn't related to the specific topic and then ask the other to refute it. If the response is tenfold leaning in the other direction you will continue to ignore such and demand a rebuttal to the specific article you posted. From there it quickly descends to the personal crapola. You don't need Science for that

As I said predictable, and what exactly is "2.1 degree" in anything?
Hey genius, haven't you heard of Google? Oh, and by the way, it was patently obvious that you haven't a scientific background.

https://ipfs.io/ipfs/QmXoypizjW3Wkn...tish_undergraduate_degree_classification.html



Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk
 
No I don't have a Science background, but you don't need one to recognize your response pattern, it is pretty predictable among all climate change deniers and especially noticeable with you. It's often called whataboutism

Any time someone posts a climate topic you are going to rebuttal with a piece you found off of a climate denier site which usually isn't related to the specific topic and then ask the other to refute it. If the response is tenfold leaning in the other direction you will continue to ignore such and demand a rebuttal to the specific article you posted. From there it quickly descends to the personal crapola. You don't need Science for that

As I said predictable, and what exactly is "2.1 degree" in anything?

And what the hell is "pure chemistry?" Was his school offering an associates degree in adulterated chemistry? Pompous ass is trying to make his undergrad degree seem exalted. Hey I have an Esq, I guess that makes me a fucking knight of the round table. Pure chemistry. LMFAO
 
And what the hell is "pure chemistry?" Was his school offering an associates degree in adulterated chemistry? Pompous ass is trying to make his undergrad degree seem exalted. Hey I have an Esq, I guess that makes me a fucking knight of the round table. Pure chemistry. LMFAO

Man you truly are an incredibly ignorant cunt!

What Is Pure Chemistry?

Have you ever wondered why water freezes or how nylon is made? Do you like to figure things out just for fun, even if you can't necessarily use the information for anything? You might enjoy pure chemistry.

If we step into the field of chemistry we will see there are two broad categories: applied chemistry and pure chemistry. You can think of each branch as sisters. Although they are related, they have very unique differences. Pure chemistry is the ability to study something for your own knowledge benefit. On the other hand, applied chemistry is the process of using your knowledge for an intended purpose or application.

Let's think of it this way, pure chemistry is our theoretical brain of chemistry. This simply means that, as a pure chemist, you like to investigate the theory or principles of important chemistry topics. Applied chemistry is our practical brain of chemistry. As an applied chemist, you research the different ways to solve real world problems.

But wait a minute; did you know pure chemistry could help its sister, applied chemistry? Yep, it can! Findings from pure chemistry research can provide a great stepping stone for applied chemistry research. There are so many projects created from scientists who were curious about something, which in the end, led to useful discoveries.



http://study.com/academy/lesson/what-is-pure-chemistry-definition-examples.html

Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk
 
Back
Top