Hillary vindicated, they are deplorable!

archives said:
That 500 represented a segment of the President's support, and it was that segment she was pointing out when she said some of his supporters were deplorable, yesterday proved her correct
Click to expand...

Ding ding ding you win!
 
Damocles said:
I was going to say this... but then somebody else already has.

The "neo-nazi" idiots are disgusting. But unfortunately, that wasn't what HillBillary was talking about.

My vote against Hillary's dangerous policy had nothing to do with this.
Click to expand...

Did she say all Rump voters are deplorables? NO!
 
Jarod said:
Did she say all Rump voters are deplorables? NO!
Click to expand...

Half are deplorable. That's about 30 million people. So these 500 people really represent 30 million people?

Sure thing Jarod. Good thing you are sooo progressive though
 
cawacko said:
He has multiple times and it shows your projection to be false. There were several million Trump voters who voted Obama. Explain that one.

See I'm a Republican who didn't vote for Trump and who hates Trump. But what liberals such as yourself are doing is transparent by trying to label all Republicans as racist etc. That's why your holier than thou sh*t don't fly
Click to expand...

Right wing lies.
 
Amadeus said:
Why did he vote for Trump? You could have saved us both some time.



Van Jones did a mini-documentary on this for CNN. The voters who voted for Obama, and then Trump, absolutely said they looked they other way (regarding racism) out of self interest.
Click to expand...

Not to mention the right exploits the number of those who went from Obama to dump.

They think they are slick.
 
Thing1 said:
Hillary said half of Trump's supporters.

Probably still an overestimate - but he does rely on a core group of racists and xenophobes. And he knows it; it's why he's afraid to condemn their actions & philosophy.
Click to expand...

why should he have to take ownership ONE guy that rammed his car into people. Did obama disavow a black guy anytime he killed somebody? The implication is he has to disavow because "obviously such people are on his team" or w/e, which is a lose/lose situation to be put in by the opposition. He doesn't have to disavow anything. It should be readily apparent he's not in favor of car ramming.
 
Thing1 said:
Hillary said half of Trump's supporters.

Probably still an overestimate - but he does rely on a core group of racists and xenophobes. And he knows it; it's why he's afraid to condemn their actions & philosophy.
Click to expand...

I don't think so, its underestimated.
 
cawacko said:
Half are deplorable. That's about 30 million people. So these 500 people really represent 30 million people?

Sure thing Jarod. Good thing you are sooo progressive though
Click to expand...

She later said half was an over estimate.

You think those 500 represent all of the Nazi's and Alt-Right ?
 
TTQ64 said:
I don't think so, its underestimated.
Click to expand...

I would agree with this. Anti-minority stereotypes have been pumped into society for so long I think it has impacted culture in very subversive ways -- such that it becomes easy to throw others under the bus. Most of us have cultural biases, some of them negative. I don't fault people for having negative perceptions of people they don't know. I fault people for surrendering to these views, refusing to change, and punishing others for their own ignorance.

Being a selfish asshole is easy. Trump is an asshole, and it fits his personality because he's notoriously lazy (both intellectually and professionally).

Being a good person takes hard work over a lifetime.
 
Literal Vampire Potbelly Goblin said:
why should he have to take ownership ONE guy that rammed his car into people. Did obama disavow a black guy anytime he killed somebody? The implication is he has to disavow because "obviously such people are on his team" or w/e, which is a lose/lose situation to be put in by the opposition. He doesn't have to disavow anything. It should be readily apparent he's not in favor of car ramming.
Click to expand...

He does the exact same thing w/ individual actions when it's a Muslim.

All he has to do is disavow racism & white supremacy. He has a hard time doing so in strong terms.
 
Literal Vampire Potbelly Goblin said:
why should he have to take ownership ONE guy that rammed his car into people. Did obama disavow a black guy anytime he killed somebody? The implication is he has to disavow because "obviously such people are on his team" or w/e, which is a lose/lose situation to be put in by the opposition. He doesn't have to disavow anything. It should be readily apparent he's not in favor of car ramming.
Click to expand...

Given the events that were occurring this act was domestic terrorism. And Trump has never been afraid to call out people by name in the past. He should have called out these Nazi-White Supremists by name and he should have said this was domestic terrorism.

Obama did suck but that's not justification for Trump's non actions here.
 
Literal Vampire Potbelly Goblin said:
why should he have to take ownership ONE guy that rammed his car into people. Did obama disavow a black guy anytime he killed somebody? The implication is he has to disavow because "obviously such people are on his team" or w/e, which is a lose/lose situation to be put in by the opposition. He doesn't have to disavow anything. It should be readily apparent he's not in favor of car ramming.
Click to expand...

He doesn't have to take ownership, but he should condemn him and call out his group for the hatred they spew.
 
Jarod said:
She later said half was an over estimate.

You think those 500 represent all of the Nazi's and Alt-Right ?
Click to expand...

Yeah, after she got the blowback she did for it.

I think the alt right is a small group that presents themselves as much bigger than they are.

But it's in your playbook to label all people you disagree with as racist. Just read this board
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top