Republicans V Democrats: The Difference

I want a society where if you don't have something I do you earn it instead of expecting taxpayers like me to provide it to you. No such thing as a safety net in today's society. It's a hammock for those too fucking lazy to do for themselves to lie in.

You are full of shit if you think a party that overwhelmingly supports affirmative action believes in a meritorious society. When you use race to benefit groups that if it were used to deny those groups something would be considered racist, that's not merit.

You vote Libertarian?
 
You vote Libertarian?

Unlike you, I don't vote bleeding heart Liberal Democrat.

Since I don't expect the government to provide me the things in life I should be providing myself (i.e. - food, clothing, shelter, healthcare coverage, and the like), seems you understand the point of the post.
 
Unlike you, I don't vote bleeding heart Liberal Democrat.

Since I don't expect the government to provide me the things in life I should be providing myself (i.e. - food, clothing, shelter, healthcare coverage, and the like), seems you understand the point of the post.

Nice job of avoiding the question. Why don't you vote libertarian based on what you claim to support here?

We all know you live in a traitor park, didn't have an athletic scholarship on college and can't afford to come to SF
 
Unlike you, I don't vote bleeding heart Liberal Democrat.

Since I don't expect the government to provide me the things in life I should be providing myself (i.e. - food, clothing, shelter, healthcare coverage, and the like), seems you understand the point of the post.

It is what it is. You and TDAK are both racist poors.

Lucky for you God loves everyone
 
Democrats have hearts.

That's a lie; the only thing the Party of the Jackass cares about is suckering low information voters to elect them so their politicians can suckle from the taxpayer teat.

There's nothing heart felt about wanting to create a society of dependent wards of the state.

We care about the poor.

Another lie; the worst and most depressing urban sewers are where Democrats have been ruling the roost for decades. There is nothing caring about turning people into dependent wards of the state.

Republicans have no heart.

Another stupid and false claim; you're quite full of stupid and lies aren't you dimwit? :rofl2:
 
Did he ever do that? I can't think of anything off the top of my head.

Of course you cannot think of anything, there's NOTHING in your head to think with. Forget what's on top of it. Dunce.

The Senate Republican leader says Republicans are ready to work with the president if he's willing to compromise on issues like tax reform and trade agreements.

 
Here's a difference .. ONLY republicans would elect a clown for president. :0) A fucking national embarrassment.

Wrong again asshat; the clown was Obama whom you still illustrate that your head is stuck up his ass.

Here's another difference .. republicans don't have the integrity to accept that democrats are taking a page out of the republican playbook after 8 years of listening those idiots whining about Obama.

Wrong again asshat; we didn't "whine", we proceeded to WIN elections. The Party of the Jackass is continuing to write pages to a playbook that when used against them will cause them to stomp their little feet and cry.

You and your cronies spent 8 years doing everything you could to defeat Obama and Obamacare

What do you think the opposition does you ignorant assclown? Hug the opposition and pass everything their hearts desire? You're not merely an ignoramus, you define the term.

Yep; Obamacare passed on a single party vote with ZERO input from the opposition and now you assclowns demand that the opposition party FIX the mess you morons created. How stupid are you? Don't answer that; it was rhetorical ass the answer is OBVIOUS.

.. and after 8 years, you still haven't accomplished either one. :0) What the fuck are you talking about?

We're just getting started dumbass; but alas, now you are all for obstruction after you were against it. You're not only an ignoramus and prolific lying asshole, but a glaring hypocrite on steroids as well.

Go pound sand asshat.
 
they are both worthless.Is one more worthless then the other? no.

Wrong; one party wants to give you more of your hard earned wealth back and allow businesses to thrive so that Americans can find good paying jobs.

The other side wants to promote massive Big Government solutions on the backs of business and the taxpayers and turn Americans into dependent wards of the state.

If you cannot comprehend the difference, you're just as stupid as the Liberal morons who infest this place with their glaring ignorance and stupidity.
 
LOL
That's lip service. It's right there in the quote. He's not genuine about wanting to work with Obama, he wants to make sure Obama is a one term president.

Yeah dumbfuck; and Democrats are trying to ensure Trump is a two term President; right?

You people aren't merely lying hypocrites, but you are whiney pathetic morons on steroids. Dunce.
 
The difference is that liberalism is an actual ideology,

Wrong again shit-for-brains; Liberalism is an ideology built on lies and false narratives desirous of burning the Constitution and turning Americans into dependent wards of the massive state.

whereas conservatism in America is a hodgepodge of conflicting ideologies (neoconservatism, social conservatism, libertarianism, etc.) -- all of which have been destroyed and absorbed by Trumpism, the philosophy of being a selfish asshole.

Irony considering that it happens to be the Party of the Jackass that is a hodgepodge of failed ideas and who has been losing elections for the last two decades.
 
Republicans worked with Clinton because Clinton was center-right, and white. I don't think McConnell is racist, or even most serving Republicans, but they do serve a base with those tenancies.

Wrong; Clinton worked with Republicans because he was smart enough to realize Democrats had lost the House and the Senate and wanted to remain elected. Obama has illustrated he lacks the intelligence to comprehend the OBVIOUS.

I do wish you had a brain. But then, you wouldn't be the ignorant low information DNC shill that we know you to be.
 
Yet he failed.

The one thing tspuke points to as a GOP success actually failed and Obama was re-elected.

This is perfect example of tspuke's M.O.; make a false premise then use that as proof for a whole bunch of faulty assumptions.

Then , the rambling, nearly incoherent.

What a stupid little child you are, tspuke. Go fuck yourself.

Dear brain dead idiot on steroids; Obama and the Party of the Jackass lost the House, then the Senate and now the White House because Obama was an arrogant moron who was tone deaf.

The Party of the Jackass lost all of the special elections as well. I know, you're an idiot and moronically think that Democrats are winning and that making Trump the centerpiece of your political strategy will gain you the House and Senate in the midterms....nothing could be dumber.
 
View attachment 4371

https://tsukesthoughts.wordpress.com/2017/07/06/republicans-v-democrats-the-difference/

Republicans V Democrats: The Difference

One of the most interesting things to see is the difference between the reactions of Democrats and Republicans to Trump and Obama. The reaction shows why one side has been successful, managing to reduce the Democrats to their lowest level of power since the 1920s, and the other side has been flailing. *

Republicans

The republican reaction can be exemplified with the famous quote of Mitch McConnell. He said he would make sure that Obama would be a one term president. Liberals and Democrats hated that but in reality Republicans are supposed to help other Republicans win. This is doubly true for the majority leader who is supposed to increase the size of his coalition.

By acknowledging that Obama would be a one term president Republicans acknowledged their loss and prepared for the next election. They did an autopsy to find out what was wrong and attempted to win enough other races in other levels to increase the size of their coalitions. Please note that the autopsy was dumb and came to all the wrong conclusions but at the very least the attempt was made. A defeat for the Republicans would have been the Democrats winning the elections 4 and 8 years after Obama was elected.

There was a small faction of Republicans, which Trump was part of, which did not accept the loss and tried to have Obama removed before his time with the birther issue. The fact is they were a small faction without any political power. The ones who were actually planning the strategy of the party had accepted the loss.

Democrats

Democrats have still not accepted their loss to Trump. Having been told their whole lives that demographics is destiny and that Republicans would never win again without cheating they have not been able to emotionally process losing to President Trump. This prevents them from looking at the events of 2016 objectively and creating an autopsy like the Republicans did. Since they have not accepted the loss they focus on short term objectives like removing Trump from power as opposed to long term ones like restoring their party to power.*

We are not talking about a small faction like the birthers in the Republican party but rather the entire party. This means that all political strategy only looks at short term effects. Every scandal has to be played up as the one that will finally impeach Trump exhausting the populace and the credibility of the media. A loss for Democrats is if Trump makes it to the next election as the President. The danger is that by next election the Democrats would have exhausted their outrage machine by so much that no one will listen to them.*

One side uses cold calculation and logic while the other uses mass hysterics and we can see the results.

On Thanksgiving, a Democrat can't really enjoy the gluttony of their Thanksgiving dinner because there are people starving elsewhere in the world...
A republican can't really enjoy the gluttony of their Thanksgiving dinner UNLESS there are people starving elsewhere in the world.

That difference sums it up perfectly.
 
On Thanksgiving, a Democrat can't really enjoy the gluttony of their Thanksgiving dinner because there are people starving elsewhere in the world...
A republican can't really enjoy the gluttony of their Thanksgiving dinner UNLESS there are people starving elsewhere in the world.

That difference sums it up perfectly.

Another massive pile of stupid; you seldom disappoint there BucklyTard.
 
On Thanksgiving, a Democrat can't really enjoy the gluttony of their Thanksgiving dinner because there are people starving elsewhere in the world...
A republican can't really enjoy the gluttony of their Thanksgiving dinner UNLESS there are people starving elsewhere in the world.

That difference sums it up perfectly.

Then why aren't Democrats personally feeding all those hungry people instead of finding ways to force others to do it if they care?
 
Back
Top