Ivanka & The POTUS: Helping Women

Proving my posit that compassion for one is neglect for another. Would you rather they not help women?

Oh, I guess you'd rather see money go into Ivanaka's cause it's Invanka's cause than making sure others didn't starve to death or die from a preventable disease, guess it's all about the Trumps with you conservatives
 
Oh, I guess you'd rather see money go into Ivanaka's cause it's Invanka's cause than making sure others didn't starve to death or die from a preventable disease, guess it's all about the Trumps with you conservatives

Compassion for one automatically means neglect for another.

Would you rather they did not help women?
 
First off, it is a new program by the World Bank, and the Trump family didn't contribute anything, all the President did was pledge to send fifty million of taxpayers money.

The act would be the equivalent of President Obama contributing US dollars to famine relief and disease control, which was done in his Administration and just about every Administration since the 1950's

No. The act would not be equivalent. It is something completely different. Trump has pledged that all of America contribute to this program. Forward thinker.
 
Proposed budget. Oh. You think it might have something to do with this?

Report: Cash-strapped UN health agency spends about $200 million a year on travel

LONDON -- The World Health Organization routinely spends about $200 million a year on travel -- far more than what it doles out to fight some of the biggest problems in public health including AIDS, tuberculosis or malaria, according to internal documents obtained by The Associated Press.

Malaria: A persistent global killer
China tests malaria drug on an entire African nation

As the cash-strapped U.N. health agency pleads for more money to fund its responses to health crises worldwide, it has also been struggling to get its own travel costs under control. Despite introducing new rules to try to curb its expansive travel budget, senior officials have complained internally that U.N. staffers are breaking the rules by booking perks like business class airplane tickets and rooms in five-star hotels.

Last year, WHO spent about $71 million on AIDS and hepatitis. On malaria, it spent $61 million. And to slow tuberculosis, WHO invested $59 million.

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/world-health-organization-un-agency-spends-big-on-travel-report/

Why do I have to keep educating conservatives?

It is not the UN, rather USAID, a US Government agency, that the President wants to cut 220 million from

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Agency_for_International_Development
 
Why do I have to keep educating conservatives?

It is not the UN, rather USAID, a US Government agency, that the President wants to cut 220 million from

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Agency_for_International_Development

First of Archive, do not flatter yourself. You cannot even educate yourself let alone anyone else. What part of this do you not get? The monies are not getting spent on the people that need it. Generally being wasted by liberals feigning to want to help while they are living it up in 5 star hotels. Even you can grasp this simple, simple proof.
 
First of Archive, do not flatter yourself. You cannot even educate yourself let alone anyone else. What part of this do you not get? The monies are not getting spent on the people that need it. Generally being wasted by liberals feigning to want to help while they are living it up in 5 star hotels. Even you can grasp this simple, simple proof.

See now your just being the stereotype obstinate conservative

You went thru what you believe is the waste of the UN, but the entity I have been discussing, the one the President wants to cut 220 million from, has absolutely nothing to do with the UN or any of its' programs, but you still can't confront that fact, and again regurgitated the same problems you see with the UN and applied it to everything

You people are celebrating the President's pledge of fifty million of Ivanka's cause, showering praised upon both Trumps for the effort, and completely ignoring the two hundred million plus he wants to cut from programs to address famine and disease in the world.
 
Democrats hate those who help blacks and women. It's a brave new world.

And it appears you rather provide aid to others to start a new business while less for those starving or dying from preventable diseases, and your doing it primarily because the President's daughter is involved.

Doesn't seem to quite fit the Judeo Christian values our Nation is supposed to be based upon
 
See now your just being the stereotype obstinate conservative

You went thru what you believe is the waste of the UN, but the entity I have been discussing, the one the President wants to cut 220 million from, has absolutely nothing to do with the UN or any of its' programs, but you still can't confront that fact, and again regurgitated the same problems you see with the UN and applied it to everything

You people are celebrating the President's pledge of fifty million of Ivanka's cause, showering praised upon both Trumps for the effort, and completely ignoring the two hundred million plus he wants to cut from programs to address famine and disease in the world.

I confronted it head-on and you ignored it. The US is still giving plenty to USAID. And now the POTUS and his lovely daughter will be helping women, as well. Let's all celebrate.
 
And it appears you rather provide aid to others to start a new business while less for those starving or dying from preventable diseases, and your doing it primarily because the President's daughter is involved.

Doesn't seem to quite fit the Judeo Christian values our Nation is supposed to be based upon

I see you think it better if the POTUS and his lovely daughter did not help women. I suspected as much.
 
I see you think it better if the POTUS and his lovely daughter did not help women. I suspected as much.

Nah, it's a good idea, but I certainly wouldn't prioritize helping women start a business over people dying from hunger and preventable diseases, but I guess that is just me
 
See now your just being the stereotype obstinate conservative

You went thru what you believe is the waste of the UN, but the entity I have been discussing, the one the President wants to cut 220 million from, has absolutely nothing to do with the UN or any of its' programs, but you still can't confront that fact, and again regurgitated the same problems you see with the UN and applied it to everything

You people are celebrating the President's pledge of fifty million of Ivanka's cause, showering praised upon both Trumps for the effort, and completely ignoring the two hundred million plus he wants to cut from programs to address famine and disease in the world.

Oh. I can see clearly now you do know jack shit about USAID. Care to tell me there "teacher" what vendors and private firms under contract that funding goes through for disbursement? Any idea of the problems with fraud they have been having over the years?
 
Nah, it's a good idea, but I certainly wouldn't prioritize helping women start a business over people dying from hunger and preventable diseases, but I guess that is just me

It is a good idea. This is why we can lay aside our differences and celebrate the man, the myth, the legend, and the First Family. Salud!
 
I confronted it head-on and you ignored it. The US is still giving plenty to USAID. And now the POTUS and his lovely daughter will be helping women, as well. Let's all celebrate.

Oh, now it is "plenty of aid," just 220 million less, 50 million of which they want to give to people to start a business, got to think if you asked the majority of those people who are attempting to start a business if they would rather give their startup money to someone who is actually starving to death they would favor the later
 
Oh, now it is "plenty of aid," just 220 million less, 50 million of which they want to give to people to start a business, got to think if you asked the majority of those people who are attempting to start a business if they would rather give their startup money to someone who is actually starving to death they would favor the later

One can never give to much real aid the truly needy. If the aid actually gets to them and not in someone elses pocket.
 
Back
Top