Airstrip One
Completely Effed
Are you saying that Douchebag Donald could improve his poll numbers by working on a problem that's not even his responsibility to deal with?
Yemen and Sudan starving children thanks to Trump
- Thread starter Micawber
- Start date
Are you saying that Douchebag Donald could improve his poll numbers by working on a problem that's not even his responsibility to deal with?
Cancel 2018.2
Oh, hi
That the OP refuses to answer this question from me and others just proves this a sick troll thread that uses the tragedy of others to push his political agenda.
Where were you for the past year with Obama was president?
Where were you for the past year with Obama was president?
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
Donate it to the CGI.....she has friends everywhere.....
When they bombed the port of Hodeida (Yemen) they disabled the port cranes used for unloading. There still are limited shipments as well as they are flying aid in. Smuggling has been offsetting some of that also.
Trump didn't cause the problem.
That's how the bleeding heart Liberals operate. They demand others do things they support then take credit as if the money came from their own pockets.
Trump didn't create the problem. Here's a solution. If you can't feed your kids, don't have them. It doesn't become someone else's responsibility to feed another person's kids when the person won't do it.
Last edited:
Many more have gone down that same way. Only ONCE is the many times I've made that same offer has anyone actually taken me up on buying them food. The others, and there are too many to count, made some sort of excuse, cursed at me when I told them no, etc. All of them, other than the one person, got the message.
Not Trump's job because he's white to do what the black President failed to do for 8 years. You'd think Obama would want to help his own people.
In other words, you want tax money to do for a personal belief what you aren't willing to do with your own money for that personal belief. Got it.
The parents of those kids are letting their own children starve.
Sure they do. Quit having kid # (fill in the blank) if you can't feed kid(s) # (fill in the blank minus 1).
Same thing applies in this country. If your resources are where you can't afford to feed your own kids and have to rely on food stamps, WIC, free/reduced school lunch, etc., what makes people think that having another one will help the problem? Why should they stop when so many bleeding hearts here expect and demand those of us providing for our own kids be forced to pay for someone else's choice to have more they can't afford.
It's this simple. If I didn't get the pussy the child came out of, it's not my responsibility unless I choose to make it so.
We're tired of your incessant complaining.
Thanks, democrats, for turning your part of America into the biggest bunch of whiners the world has ever had to put up with.
Are you saying it's OK for those that are currently unable to provide for THEIR kids to have more kids for the rest of us to be forced to feed?
What I am saying CFM is that for some circumstances are beyond their control. I am sure, certain, no one has a child with the intention of starving that child for fun. You as a human being should have enough compassion to not take whatever is going on in your mind on innocent children. To clarify that even further, there may in fact come a day that you or someone you know may need help feeding themselves. I sincerely hope for you everyone is not thinking like you should that occur. Or you will feel the real pangs of starvation. And remember this conversation vividly.
It's beyond their control to do what it takes to produce a child or more children they can't afford to feed?
Whether or not that is their intention is irrelevant. That those responsible for feeding what they produce is the relevant part. Didn't say they did it for fun just that they took the action which makes it their responsibility to pay for the choice they made.
I don't lack compassion because I expect those making the choice the choice to pay for the results of it. If I make a choice to buy something for which I cannot pay knowing that there is a distinct possibility that I can't, I don't expect you or anyone else to be forced to do it. In fact, I don't expect you or anyone else to do it at all. That's why I'm careful about the choices I make so the possibility of that happening is little or none. I find it quite amusing that you think you can determine a level of compassion for anyone but yourself. You keep talking about what I should do yet nothing about what you do. If you expect me to be compassionate under your definition of it, start showing it before you start demanding it.
You didn't answer my question. Is it OK for those that are currently unable to provide for THEIR kids to have more kids for the rest of us to be forced to feed?
You might sell that bleeding heart bullshit to someone else but I'm not buying.