Ethical Question: Cloning Neanderthal

CFM said:
Does that include states like Kentucky, Missouri, Maryland, Delaware that were part of the Union.

My family never owned slaves. That would have been impossible. Wanna guess why?

You don't have to agree with my statement. That's never has been nor ever will be a requirement for it to be correct.

Strange that the very people that claim slavery has a lot to do with why they fall behind the rest of society today continue to support a party that keeps them on the "plantation" doing Lyndon Johnson's bidding. It's bad enough Johnson said what he said related to voting. What's worse is the blacks obliged him and did it. What's worse than that is they don't realize that they do it.
Click to expand...

Who jumped ship first?

I forgot good ol' Strom Thurmond. Your family just loved him, didn't they?
 
domer76 said:
Right. They were afraid they couldn't own their niggers anymore, so they jumped ship.

Pussies (like you), to boot.
Click to expand...

Actually they could. The US Supreme Court said so. And it took a Constitutional Amendment to change that.

So, they weren't doing anything illegal.
 
CFM said:
It's not the white people on welfare in the South. There are 63 congressional district nationwide where more than 1 in 5 people use food stamps. Some of them come closer to 30% than 20%. Alabama, NC, SC, and Georgia have 7 of those 63 (11%). Of those 7, 6 have elected Democrats to Congress. In 5 of those 6, there is a significant black majority and a black representative. Nothing like a built in minority majority to guarantee someone that would otherwise not get elected will win.
Click to expand...

There are more of your precious crackers on welfare than there are blacks.
 
CFM said:
It has a history of following the Constitution and taking a stand when dickheads like you abused their power on the national level. It depends on how you look at it. Nothing racist about wanting to uphold the Constitution as it's written rather than what you would want it to say.
Click to expand...

South Carolina has never upheld the Constitution. Before it seceded from America, it advocated nullification during the Jackson Administration, which is unconstitutional. Jackson promptly put the fuckers in their place. After it seceded from America, South Carolina was no longer attempting to live under the Constitution, and therefore could not champion it. Instead, it attempted to seize an American fort. People like you always seem to think that it would have been a good idea for Lincoln to show weakness toward an enemy, and just give the Confederates whatever they asked for, because you love a foreign government more than you do America. You would have cheered when Chamberlain gave Germany the Sudetenland.
 
Pocahontas said:
South Carolina has never upheld the Constitution. Before it seceded from America, it advocated nullification during the Jackson Administration, which is unconstitutional. Jackson promptly put the fuckers in their place. After it seceded from America, South Carolina was no longer attempting to live under the Constitution, and therefore could not champion it. Instead, it attempted to seize an American fort. People like you always seem to think that it would have been a good idea for Lincoln to show weakness toward an enemy, and just give the Confederates whatever they asked for, because you love a foreign government more than you do America. You would have cheered when Chamberlain gave Germany the Sudetenland.
Click to expand...

Maybe I missed it, but I never saw him say he was a Confederate sympathizer.

Secession itself was not an Unconstitutional act at the time. They had asked the Federal government to vacate Ft. Sumter, which Lincoln refused to do.

And we know the rest of that history.

I think today even most Confederate sympathizers are glad the Confederacy lost. Other than a Hank Williams Jr. song about 30 years ago, I don't think I've ever heard anybody say recently a Confederate victory would have been a good thing.
 
Taft2016 said:
Maybe I missed it, but I never saw him say he was a Confederate sympathizer.

Secession itself was not an Unconstitutional act at the time. They had asked the Federal government to vacate Ft. Sumter, which Lincoln refused to do.

And we know the rest of that history.

I think today even most Confederate sympathizers are glad the Confederacy lost. Other than a Hank Williams Jr. song about 30 years ago, I don't think I've ever heard anybody say recently a Confederate victory would have been a good thing.
Click to expand...

I think if you ask your average southern resident today, that's the case. But the people who aggressively defend the CSA and attack Lincoln on this site and elsewhere clearly wish that America had been defeated. Americans were mixed about the constitutionality of secession at the time. If it is unconstitutional now, though, then it was at the time, as the Constitution has not been physically altered in response to secession.
 
Pocahontas said:
I think if you ask your average southern resident today, that's the case. But the people who aggressively defend the CSA and attack Lincoln on this site and elsewhere clearly wish that America had been defeated. Americans were mixed about the constitutionality of secession at the time. If it is unconstitutional now, though, then it was at the time, as the Constitution has not been physically altered in response to secession.
Click to expand...

Lincoln was a great leader. So was Robert E. Lee.

The war was a tragedy all around.
 
Taft2016 said:
Lincoln was a great leader. So was Robert E. Lee.

The war was a tragedy all around.
Click to expand...
Lee was a highly capable general. It's hard to say how great, though, because McClelland is the most incompetent general in US history, and Meade/Burnside/etc. were not serious competition, either. When he finally had to contend with Grant, he lost.

The war was a tragedy because the southern states were offered the legal protection of slavery, in exchange for their loyalty, but refused the offer because they didn't want to be countrymen with those who would question the morality of slavery to begin with.
 
Taft2016 said:
Actually they could. The US Supreme Court said so. And it took a Constitutional Amendment to change that.

So, they weren't doing anything illegal.
Click to expand...

(laughing)

And that made it just fucking fine and dandy, didn't it, shitweasel?

My point still stands. They were afraid they would lose their niggers, so they jumped ship.
 
While I agree that slavery was wrong; the liberal tirades against the South, seem a little one sided.

Why aren't they having the same angst against the slavery that occurred in the Native American society, prior to European colonization?

OR

Why aren't they rallying against modern day slavery, that still exists in other countries; instead of spending all their energy on what USED TO BE?
 
South Carolina has a Black U.S. Senator and elected an Indian woman as governor. :palm:
 
Christian freed the Blacks., and ended the socialist monarchy tradition of slavery that lingered in the U.S..
 
CFM said:
Backstepping, pussy? I'm not the coward that changes his name on regular basis. What will it be next week, coward? Let's see. Perhaps you should change it to NL as that is exactly what you are.
Click to expand...

What does "NL" stand for ?
Nice Lad?
You have substantially embarrassed Taft by backing his racism up and revealing him for what he is...
I want to thank you for that...
 
Pocahontas said:
There are more of your precious crackers on welfare than there are blacks.
Click to expand...

^^^A statement that proves you have no understanding of proportions.

No one is arguing raw data, boy, but raw data doesn't tell the true story. What you don't seem to get is that 1 in every 3 1/2 blacks (28%) is on food stamps while only 1 in 12 whites (8%) is on them. I know you don't like it when things are put on an apples to apples comparison but that's how it works and how it should be viewed.
 
Pocahontas said:
Getting politically ass-raped by Andrew Jackson, and then militarily PWNED by Lincoln sure makes South Carolina historically great.
Click to expand...

SC held to the principles of the Constitution and federalism. SC seems to understand that. You don't.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top