Ethical Question: Cloning Neanderthal

It's not un-American to stand up for the Constitution that the union states abused. Like Thomas Jefferson said 85 years before the southern states seceded, there comes a time when the political bands between groups have to be broken. Just like those that figured out England's abuse of power wasn't going to change, those in the South figured it out.

You don't sound like you'd fight for any cause.

You never did tell us what NL stands for, CFM ...
Are you a pussy or something?
 
He's something, all right. But he's also a pussy.

I'm something. It's called your and Buckly's superior.

I know Buckly's not coming. He's already lied about it. You've said you were but haven't shown yet despite claiming that you fly for free. Still waiting but don't expect a coward like you to show.
 
I'm something. It's called your and Buckly's superior.

I know Buckly's not coming. He's already lied about it. You've said you were but haven't shown yet despite claiming that you fly for free. Still waiting but don't expect a coward like you to show.

Do you text when you're driving the short bus? Don't. You're fellow cocksucking moron, Text Driver are Killers, will not be your butt buddy anymore.
 
Do you text when you're driving the short bus? Don't. You're fellow cocksucking moron, Text Driver are Killers, will not be your butt buddy anymore.

Just another example proving I'm your superior ^^^^^^^.

You just can't help being a D.F.N.
 
It's not un-American to stand up for the Constitution that the union states abused. Like Thomas Jefferson said 85 years before the southern states seceded, there comes a time when the political bands between groups have to be broken. Just like those that figured out England's abuse of power wasn't going to change, those in the South figured it out.

You don't sound like you'd fight for any cause.

It's un-American to support constitutional violations, such as nullification and policy that violates federalism. And after secession, the southerners weren't American at all, given that they had founded a new country, and were Confederates.
 
Of course, they should care for their own interests. But ending slavery was not the main interest.

Why didn't they support the union? Britain's dependence on cotton was the reason they did not support the union and did consider intervention in favor of the South.

I am sure there was sincere support for ending slavery among the British people. But it is pure speculation to assume that that would have ended slavery in short order.

Strictly, 'countries' don't have interests - ruling classes do, and obviously the British ruling class would have loved to join the South in crushing the Union. The mass of the British people, however, were so totally set against slavery that the bosses couldn't get away with it, and if they'd been free to fight en masse they would certainly have wiped out the slavers everywhere in very short order indeed.
 
Back
Top