Mott the Hoople
Sweet Jane
Thats because evolutionary theory doesn't model the origins of life or it's creation. It models speciation.The evidence for evolution creating life is far less than the evidence for God creating life..................
Thats because evolutionary theory doesn't model the origins of life or it's creation. It models speciation.The evidence for evolution creating life is far less than the evidence for God creating life..................
Evolution is one of the functions of DNA, as DNA creates an organism that has the ability to adapt and improve it's offspring to a changing world. This happens because the creator of DNA knew full well that the Earth like all planets would change over time. We evolve, just like every machine we have ever built, including your computer...............
For you, the beginning of life was when your dad fucked his sister.
That and they don't want to present a scientific alternative, they want to present a magical God alternative by dressing him up in a lab coat so the can trot him out in my kid's second grade class alongside evolution.
Horseshit
First piece of evidence is that life exists.
and where did you find this evidence?......oh wait, in your faith, right?.....The second is absence of evidence of a deity.
. Could? Yes.
Do you think he is a carbon based life form?Ask his kids.![]()
Your objection is a bit of a fallacy.
Calculating the probability of Mott being born is unity.
Calculating the probability of single functional protein being formed [by a random process] has been done---and the odds are absurdly prohibitive.
Thats because evolutionary theory doesn't model the origins of life or it's creation. It models speciation.
as opposed to plain old, ordinary creation?......You can believe in special creation all you want.
punctuated equilibrium for example.
Your lack of intelligence is clear by your vocabulary
That and they're unable to present a scientific alternative.
Because no one was there to observe it.
Doesn't that make it unfalsifiable?
No and no. In principle it's easily falsifiable but we're straying from the point of this thread and going over ground we've been to before. Ultimately a theory is only as useful as the predictions it makes that can be tested and independently verified. In that respect it is one of the single most important scientific theories ever, not withstanding your disagreement with it and will remain so until some empirical evidence is discovered that falsifies it are until a better scientific model is discovered.
I must be in the minority here; because I happen to believe in God and evolution.
As far as I'm concerned, they go hand in hand.