Trump says...time to move on.

It's impossible to prove either way.

The problem is nothing that was leaked was ever demonstrated to be untrue. In fact, the leaks were instrumental in educating voters on the depth of corruption in the democrat party. An informed electorate is never a bad thing in a democracy.

The crux of the Hillary loss boiled down to jobs and the economy---that, and not the Russians, was how she lost the Rust Belt. This was a Rust Belt election, in a sense.

Also, democrats need to come to the realization that not every candidate is going to attract black or other minority voters like Barack did. If you're not careful, you're going to find yourselves chasing the identity politics carrot every four years and ignoring voters who put jobs and the economy ahead of the race/gender windmill.
Without question, Clinton made the error of believing that they had the minority/youth vote in the bag.

But to the point....Russians no doubt had plenty of info on Republicans. What do you suppose Republican internal emails looked like during the primaries? What would have happened if the electorate were privy to that?

It isn't the job of the Democrats to prove anything 'untrue'. Maybe in an election, where even the dumbest among us get the same vote as the smartest.
 
funny how it was the rust belt where she lost and no where else that wasn't at least foreseen. How many time did she campaign in Mi and WI?
none..oh wait..
Clinton was a despicable candidate -utterly barf-worthy. I'm a registered Dem and I voted Repuplican for the very first time for POTUS.

I'm sure I wasn't the only one revolted by her no message imperious ,inane camaoign...but why blame the Message?
The Russians did it is so much more fun to blame.
 
Without question, Clinton made the error of believing that they had the minority/youth vote in the bag.

But to the point....Russians no doubt had plenty of info on Republicans. What do you suppose Republican internal emails looked like during the primaries? What would have happened if the electorate were privy to that?

It isn't the job of the Democrats to prove anything 'untrue'. Maybe in an election, where even the dumbest among us get the same vote as the smartest.

Why don't you post what Republican internal emails looked like during the primaries. Are you saying there were things that needed to be shown? What we do know is what the Democrat's said. If the Democrats aren't willing to refute claims, tells me they know they're true and are only mad because they got caught.
 
funny how it was the rust belt where she lost and no where else that wasn't at least foreseen. How many time did she campaign in Mi and WI?
none..oh wait..
Clinton was a despicable candidate -utterly barf-worthy. I'm a registered Dem and I voted Repuplican for the very first time for POTUS.

I'm sure I wasn't the only one revolted by her no message imperious ,inane camaoign...but why blame the Message?
The Russians did it is so much more fun to blame.


Clinton thought she had both of those states in the bag.
 
The Dems need to reform their primary system -get rid of superdelegates or whatever.

Bernie frequently said he had betrer poll numbers then Clinton. It was a rigged game. He was right.
 
The Dems need to reform their primary system -get rid of superdelegates or whatever.

Bernie frequently said he had betrer poll numbers then Clinton. It was a rigged game. He was right.

Didn't emails prove that, too?
 
"The Democrats say the Russians hacked information, that information was provided/posted, and it influenced the election. What the Democrats don't argue is that the information is incorrect just that it shouldn't have been posted. It goes back to the outlook that if you don't do it, it can't be posted." CM #40
And therefore what?

You think that confirms that Democrats are amoral evil-doers, and Republicans are to a man champions of moral rectitude?

News Flash:
They BOTH have secrets.
Just look at TODAY'S front page.
Buffalo school board makes moves to oust Trump's NY co-chair
CBS News - ‎3 hours ago‎

BUFFALO, N.Y. -- A co-chairman of Republican Donald Trump's New York presidential campaign who publicly insulted Democratic President Barack Obama and his wife has been asked to resign from a local school board.
In conclusion:
"if you don't do it, it can't be posted." Captain Obvious #40
What merit do you perceive in posting the perfectly obvious? Do you actually think you're teaching anybody anything?
 
Didn't emails prove that, too?
don't understand. The Clinton Emails had nothing to do with the Russians they are the one's that damaged her.
They were released by the State Dept -and released because of FOIA requests.

"The Russians" (Wiki) were a comical look at her FUBAR campaign.but not damaging on Clinton herself.
The DNC hacks just showed it was a "rigged game" HTHelps
 
And therefore what?

You think that confirms that Democrats are amoral evil-doers, and Republicans are to a man champions of moral rectitude?

News Flash:
They BOTH have secrets.
Just look at TODAY'S front page.

In conclusion:

What merit do you perceive in posting the perfectly obvious? Do you actually think you're teaching anybody anything?

Apparently you aren't capable of learning. The Democrats argue that information that influenced the election was posted but they don't argue that it's untrue. What are they ashamed of. Sounds to me it's not what they did but getting caught.
 
"Apparently you aren't capable of learning. The Democrats argue that information that influenced the election was posted but they don't argue that it's untrue." CM #49
I knew that days before you posted it.

You still haven't explained why you think it's worth stating this obvious point.
"What are they ashamed of."
I'll infer a question mark there.

Shame? (your word)

Please quote any Democrat that declared "shame" about it.
"Sounds to me it's not what they did but getting caught."
Then you misapprehend the issue.

Putin is a dangerous, dangerous man.
Governor Romney warned of this in his 2012 presidential campaign. And it turns out Romney was more right than many knew; and Putin may already have proved himself even more dangerous than Romney warned.

- Annexing Crimea.

- Mayhem in Ukraine.

- Large scale mayhem in Syria.

- Cyber-war covert action apparently intended to influence the outcome of a U.S. presidential election THAT BY THE WAY resulted in the long-time leader in most respected polls unexpectedly losing.

Coincidence?
 
I knew that days before you posted it.

You still haven't explained why you think it's worth stating this obvious point.

I'll infer a question mark there.

Shame? (your word)

Please quote any Democrat that declared "shame" about it.

Then you misapprehend the issue.

Putin is a dangerous, dangerous man.
Governor Romney warned of this in his 2012 presidential campaign. And it turns out Romney was more right than many knew; and Putin may already have proved himself even more dangerous than Romney warned.

- Annexing Crimea.

- Mayhem in Ukraine.

- Large scale mayhem in Syria.

- Cyber-war covert action apparently intended to influence the outcome of a U.S. presidential election THAT BY THE WAY resulted in the long-time leader in most respected polls unexpectedly losing.

Coincidence?

Apparently the Democrats shame is in getting caught not what they do.

In the end, all that matters if the bitch Hillary won't be President and it burns her up. It's hilarious to watch all the lefties squirm in a situation they NEVER thought would happen. It must be a heartbreak for them to know that someone they considered an idiot beat them.
 
Semantics. Do you deny that the DNC hack, coupled with the Russian based fake news sites affected the election?

Semantics? Do you agree that it was entirely the fault of Clinton due to the fact that she was engaging in activity that made it necessary to launch an investigation in the first place...had she not been so stupid in using an open server....she would have never released the names of agents still under cover in the field resulting in several deaths....and the NSA would never had any reason to release her e-mails through wikileaks and blame Russia as an obvious deflection. :)
 
Apparently the Democrats shame is in getting caught not what they do.

In the end, all that matters if the bitch Hillary won't be President and it burns her up. It's hilarious to watch all the lefties squirm in a situation they NEVER thought would happen. It must be a heartbreak for them to know that someone they considered an idiot beat them.

No shame. The shame is on you. You voted for a serial bankrupter, sexual predator (pussy grabber) and thief (stiffed many contractors plus stole money from those who invested in his fake Trump University). Heartbreak? None whatsoever. It's now become the Trump Comedy Hour. Your idiot is proving to be the most unqualified president of all time. It's fun watching him step over and dodge all the shit he's created. Stock tip: invest in hip waders. Stay tuned. Enjoy the show!
 
Apparently the Democrats shame is in getting caught not what they do.

In the end, all that matters if the bitch Hillary won't be President and it burns her up. It's hilarious to watch all the lefties squirm in a situation they NEVER thought would happen. It must be a heartbreak for them to know that someone they considered an idiot beat them.


fuck you vaniila Isis
 
Semantics? Do you agree that it was entirely the fault of Clinton due to the fact that she was engaging in activity that made it necessary to launch an investigation in the first place...had she not been so stupid in using an open server....she would have never released the names of agents still under cover in the field resulting in several deaths....and the NSA would never had any reason to release her e-mails through wikileaks and blame Russia as an obvious deflection. :)

fuck you vanilla Isis
 
"Apparently the Democrats shame is in getting caught not what they do." CM #51 guessed wildly
If you are a Democrat holding elected office, then you have standing to state THEIR position.

If you're not, you don't.
You're welcome to quote them, and then make a pertinent comment on it.

But you mislabeling your character assassinating opinion "apparently" does not validate or legitimize your opinion.

"It must be a heartbreak for them to know that someone they considered an idiot beat them."
"Donald Trump is a phony, a fraud. His promises are as worthless as a degree from Trump University. ... playing the members of the American public for suckers. He gets a free ride to the White House. And all we get is a lousy hat." Mitt Romney

"I think it's time for him [Donald Trump ("R"-NY) Republican 2016 presidential candidate] to look like a serious candidate for president." Majority Leader McConnell (R-KY)

"I'm not there yet." Speaker Ryan (R)
"It must be a heartbreak for them to know that someone they considered an idiot beat them."

You're welcome to quote anyone that called Trump "an idiot" (your term).

Those I heard commenting simply observed that he's unfit. It was true then. It's true now.

Candidate Trump isn't even willing to attend his PDB; a fact that has alarmed Hayden enough to make public comment on it.

It might not be so bad if Trump knew something about it. It's quite alarming how little Trump knows.

And this is alarmingly confirmed by comments Trump has made, such as - I know more about ISIL than the top U.S. military commanders, believe me. -

Trump is a genuine danger; not out of idiocy (your allegation), but out of inadequacy. Trump is quite bright at making money.

That's not enough to be a good president.

QUESTION:

To whom has Trump ever had to answer?
 
Trump is interesting, if Obama does it or says it, he is opposed.

Obama should try some reverse psychology. Make a speech calling for the repeal of Obamacare....
 
Back
Top