The Threat of a Right-Wing Supreme Court: Analyzing Trump's Prospective Justices

*applause* libs want those "activist" judges -the text be damned

They do indeed. And they also know the inherent danger in it, which is why they are so adamant about getting one of their own installed on the bench.

They know both sides can play that game. Though a textualist almost by definition, can't be an activist judge because his first priority is the written word, so to speak. And the words in the document may or may not be amenable to the political agenda.

But if Hillary get her way and stacks the Court it will essentially become a nine member legislative body---with a liberal bent.

Hardly what the founders intended.
 
Notice Clinton's requirements are a laundry list, and her inability to understand WHY Citizens United was resolved in such a manner
 
Nothing to add about judicial activism in that election?

Scalia et al. could have let the political process continue but they overrode it. So effectively five conservative justices determined the outcome of that election, screw the voters.

Political process? Counting and recounting CHADS for weeks and months in an attempt to defraud the will of THE PEOPLE after having already publicly announced that the state of FLA. goes to Gore....inferring there is no need for the west coast folks to support his opponent. Yep...that's some POLITICAL PROCESS. Gore refusing to concede (while attempting to claim plausible deniability using his political allies in the state of Fla. as a shield to hide behind in demanding a re-count in only 4 heavily held DEMOCRAT counties) and demanding recount after recount while attempting to disallow the military overseas votes. Someone had to say...enough is enough to the cry baby political bosses that thought they had already stolen the election. But as always..even with recent history, the attempt is to RE-VISE it with communist propaganda. Reality check: The courts had to step in and demand a state wide re-count, but that was refused on appeal and ended up going all the way to the SCOTUS (who had no business in Fla. politics to begin with...it should have been allowed to stand with a total state re-count...hell even the leftists at ASK WIKI conclude that Bush would have won a total recount....thus..the DEMOCRAT APPEAL)

The question is....why was the courts involved in a supposed "free election" in the 1st place...if you communists accept the election results with humility as FEIGNED? Why did it take weeks and months to count and recount and LMAO count chads over and over and over? Priceless. As I said....the only objective evidence that any communist such as yourself provides is the objective lesson in contradiction, double standards and HYPOCRISY....that all equals to nothing less than a demonstration of self professed "FASCISM", as clearly YOUR RIGHTS trump all other societal rights, Gore had the (wink, wink) right to re-count only democrat strong hold counties, with Bush having no rights of a re-count across the entirety of Fla..... right Comrade? Laugh My Proverbial Ass Off:)
 
Last edited:
Political process? Counting and recounting CHADS for weeks and months in an attempt to defraud the will of THE PEOPLE after having already publicly announced that the state of FLA. goes to Gore....inferring there is no need for the west coast folks to support his opponent. Yep...that's some POLITICAL PROCESS. Gore refusing to concede (while attempting to claim plausible deniability using his political allies in the state of Fla. as a shield to hide behind in demanding a re-count in only 4 heavily held DEMOCRAT counties) and demanding recount after recount while attempting to disallow the military overseas votes. Someone had to say...enough is enough to the cry baby political bosses that thought they had already stolen the election. But as always..even with recent history, the attempt is to RE-VISE it with communist propaganda. Reality check: The courts had to step in and demand a state wide re-count, but that was refused on appeal and ended up going all the way to the SCOTUS (who had no business in Fla. politics to begin with...it should have been allowed to stand with a total state re-count...hell even the leftists at ASK WIKI conclude that Bush would have won a total recount....thus..the DEMOCRAT APPEAL)

The question is....why was the courts involved in a supposed "free election" in the 1st place...if you communists accept the election results with humility as FEIGNED? Why did it take weeks and months to count and recount and LMAO count chads over and over and over? Priceless. As I said....the only objective evidence that any communist such as yourself provides is the objective lesson in contradiction, double standards and HYPOCRISY....that all equals to nothing less than a demonstration of self professed "FASCISM", as clearly YOUR RIGHTS trump all other societal rights, Gore had the (wink, wink) right to re-count only democrat strong hold counties, with Bush having no rights of a re-count across the entirety of Fla..... right Comrade? Laugh My Proverbial Ass Off:)

What "communists" Ralphie -boy?
Name names.
 
Political process? Counting and recounting CHADS for weeks and months in an attempt to defraud the will of THE PEOPLE after having already publicly announced that the state of FLA. goes to Gore....inferring there is no need for the west coast folks to support his opponent. Yep...that's some POLITICAL PROCESS. Gore refusing to concede (while attempting to claim plausible deniability using his political allies in the state of Fla. as a shield to hide behind in demanding a re-count in only 4 heavily held DEMOCRAT counties) and demanding recount after recount while attempting to disallow the military overseas votes. Someone had to say...enough is enough to the cry baby political bosses that thought they had already stolen the election. But as always..even with recent history, the attempt is to RE-VISE it with communist propaganda. Reality check: The courts had to step in and demand a state wide re-count, but that was refused on appeal and ended up going all the way to the SCOTUS (who had no business in Fla. politics to begin with...it should have been allowed to stand with a total state re-count...hell even the leftists at ASK WIKI conclude that Bush would have won a total recount....thus..the DEMOCRAT APPEAL)

The question is....why was the courts involved in a supposed "free election" in the 1st place...if you communists accept the election results with humility as FEIGNED? Why did it take weeks and months to count and recount and LMAO count chads over and over and over? Priceless. As I said....the only objective evidence that any communist such as yourself provides is the objective lesson in contradiction, double standards and HYPOCRISY....that all equals to nothing less than a demonstration of self professed "FASCISM", as clearly YOUR RIGHTS trump all other societal rights, Gore had the (wink, wink) right to re-count only democrat strong hold counties, with Bush having no rights of a re-count across the entirety of Fla..... right Comrade? Laugh My Proverbial Ass Off:)

They were going to count ballots till they got 'the right number' lol, and everyone knew it, so the Court stepped in and put a stop to it.

Yet they whine about Trump saying he's going to wait and see how things turned out.
 
Clinton sees the court as another way to get what she wants. If she can't get it thru CONGRESS,she would get it thru activist judges
 
Trump has indicated that he wants the most conservative supreme court one can ever imagine. More conservative than both Bush's wanted, more than Nixon, even more than Reagan.

It's no wonder these leftists have turned up the hate on Trump so much and especially the feminists with their precious abortion and RVW .. their whole Trump (pardon the pun) card for being independent from these no good men.

My above statement is not a stretch of the imagination. One can understand just how desperate the PC liberal establishment is by wanting Trump defeated by any means. This election is immensely important over the supreme court if for no other reason than that.
 
What "communists" Ralphie -boy?
Name names.

Names? All democrats calling themselves social liberals, all republicans calling themselves moderate PROGRESSIVES, All media executives that CREATE NEWS...i.e., propaganda instead of simply reporting events as they happen. All individuals that support the communist party USA and its transmission belt the american communist lawyer union (ACLU)...its not rocket science.

No. one on the hit list? The Black Marxist Muslim..i.e., the person once called BARRY OBAMA.....his advisory Czars that are card carrying communists like Van Jones....not to mention both Axelrod and Jarrett with demonstrable ties to communist KGB worm Frank Marshall Davis who was under constant observation by the FBI for ties to communism. Also least we forget that over 400 Muslim agents with direct ties to terrorism visited the white house since its been under communist control with the current administration.

The list of social communists calling themselves PROGRESSIVE, LIBERAL SOCIAL DEMOCRATS now or recently in congress in both houses? Barbra Boxer, Dick Durban, Louis Gutierrez, John Conyers, Charlie Rangel, Tom Harkin, Barbra Mikulski, Elizabeth Warren, Ed Markey, Debbie Stabenow, Al Fraken, Sherrod Brown, Ron Wyden, Jeff Merkley, Patty Murray, Tammy Baldwin.....TAKE A BREATH.....

Nancy Pelosi, Marcy Kaptur, Peter DeFazio, Shelia Jackson Lee, Jim McDermott.....and at least a dozen more.... to include several Republicans calling themselves PROGRESSIVE REPUBLICANS....Olympia Snow, Susan Collins, Scott Brown, Lisa Murkowski, and of course now we have TRUMP pretending to be a conservative capitalist who has historically used social cronyism to purchase power and wealth through government corruption and the use of tax payer monies....running against a confirmed Alinskite Hildabeast.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top