In 2000 both Bush and Gore challenged the election results.

Why do we even care if Trump accepts the results? Are we really supposed to fear his supporters? Come on, they're a harmless bunch. Hell, the fights at their rallies were staged by liberal operatives. Trump supporters couldn't even start their own fights!

thank you for acknowledging this :)
 
so basically it depends on the result and how close it is to determine? Does that mean we wait till election day?

Or does it mean we should commit to accepting the result no matter how close or how far it is?

Here's the way it worked with Florida, douchebag. The winner would be President. No other state mattered. The vote count difference was a few hundred, mandating a recount. There were also major fuckups in Florida with black districts having excessive problems.

But it ain't gonna come down to one state and a few hundred votes.

Fuck Trump. So what if he doesn't concede? The states will still certify a winner and Trump will be outside looking in, concession or not.
 
Here's the way it worked with Florida, douchebag. The winner would be President. No other state mattered. The vote count difference was a few hundred, mandating a recount. There were also major fuckups in Florida with black districts having excessive problems.

But it ain't gonna come down to one state and a few hundred votes.

Fuck Trump. So what if he doesn't concede? The states will still certify a winner and Trump will be outside looking in, concession or not.

so basically we have to wait until election day to find out if a situation like that occurs yes? Or can you tell me now exactly what the results will be?

I guess we have to be in suspense till election day? Or does contesting only work if your a democrat? :)
 
so basically we have to wait until election day to find out if a situation like that occurs yes? Or can you tell me now exactly what the results will be?

I guess we have to be in suspense till election day? Or does contesting only work if your a democrat? :)

Not sure why this is so hard to understand.

All of the "recount" stuff? That's built into what we call the election process. It's legal, and part of ascertaining the results of an election. That's why a state like Florida had it written into law.

Once the election process is OVER, it is expected that the losing candidate concedes. Like Chris Wallace was saying in his question, this is a vital part of American tradition and our democracy.

When Trump is talking about keeping us in suspense, it's over the final result, and if he'll actually concede at that point. That is after the election process is over.

I hope that helps.
 
I don't really have the time nor the inclination to educate an ignoramus like you, but the closeness of the 2000 Florida vote demanded a recount.

Fact is that Trump is going to get his ass kicked so bad, that will not be necessary. Fuck him and his concession. The election will be certified without it.

Yep....that's real "democratic" of you. LMAO The party of the people and the constitution always appear to be at odds with the constitution, from the 1st amendment and religious freedom to the 2nd amendment and the right of the people to defend both property and life with arms....to the amendments after the civil war that granted blacks, women the right to vote and own property...to the Jim Crow laws singed into law at the federal level by a democrat congress and POTUS in 1913....to flooding the Supreme Court with a Roosevelt court in order to circumvent the Constitution in the 30s...while making blacks and other minorities vote democrat or lose their entitlement to the NEW DEAL HANDOUTS..i.e., the NEW COMMUNIST DEAL that prolonged a market correction and turned it into a Great Depression for well over a 10 year period.

Now...we are expected to believe they have turned over a new leaf and respect the constitutional process? Really? :)
 
Not sure why this is so hard to understand.

All of the "recount" stuff? That's built into what we call the election process. It's legal, and part of ascertaining the results of an election. That's why a state like Florida had it written into law.

Once the election process is OVER, it is expected that the losing candidate concedes. Like Chris Wallace was saying in his question, this is a vital part of American tradition and our democracy.

When Trump is talking about keeping us in suspense, it's over the final result, and if he'll actually concede at that point. That is after the election process is over.

I hope that helps.

It won't help these idiots. They're spouting the same thing they heard from the R losers last night. Jesus, listening to these Trump apologists try to spin his trouncing is like fingernails on a blackboard.
 
Not sure why this is so hard to understand.

All of the "recount" stuff? That's built into what we call the election process. It's legal, and part of ascertaining the results of an election. That's why a state like Florida had it written into law.

Once the election process is OVER, it is expected that the losing candidate concedes. Like Chris Wallace was saying in his question, this is a vital part of American tradition and our democracy.

When Trump is talking about keeping us in suspense, it's over the final result, and if he'll actually concede at that point. That is after the election process is over.

I hope that helps.

Nobody said it was illegal....thats just trying to throw shit on the wall....

A profile of Secretary of State John Kerry published Sunday in The New Yorker reveals that, 11 years after his election loss to George W. Bush in 2004, Kerry still believes he was robbed via systematic fraud.

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2015/12/15/john-kerry-thinks-bush-rigged-the-2004-election/#ixzz4Ne3KJ9ht

Now 11 years after the election to still be going on about being robbed by fraud is more than a little crazy....
Obama said, “I have never seen in my lifetime or in modern political history any presidential candidate trying to discredit the election process before votes have even taken place.”

Obama’s memory must be pretty short, so here is this list to remind him — and everyone else — of eight times liberals claimed an election was or would be stolen.
http://thefederalist.com/2016/10/19/8-times-liberals-claimed-election-stolen-rigged/
 
we don’t have to go too far back in time. How about just last week as Clinton appeared with Al Gore in Miami, FL.

While Gore tried to stress the importance of voting he referenced his loss to George W. Bush in 2000. As the crowd begins chanting “YOU WON! YOU WON!” Watch Mrs. Clinton smile and nod in agreement.

http://hotair.com/archives/2016/10/20/last-week-hillary-agreed-gore-won-2000-election/

Sure seems like Hillary is saying that she still don't accept the election results of 2000.....

But then there is that double standard that pinheads adhere to a hundred percent of the time.....and if pinheads were perfectly honest (sic) they'd admit
Trump DID NOT say he wouldn't accept it, he just wouldn't say yes or not....but then pinheads can't face honesty
 
Yep....that's real "democratic" of you. LMAO The party of the people and the constitution always appear to be at odds, from the 1st amendment and religious freedom to the 2nd amendment and the right of the people to defend both property and life with arms....to the amendments after the civil war that granted blacks, women the right to vote and own property...to the Jim Crow laws singed into law at the federal level by a democrat congress and POTUS.

Now...we are expected to believe they have turned over a new leaf and respect the constitutional process? Really? :)

Fuck you and your religious freedom claim. You're one of pricks that would cloak his bigotry in his religion to violate the civil rights of others. Eat shit.

Keep your stupid little popgun if you think it makes you feel safer. Hint, dumbshit. It doesn't. You are more likely to be injured by a gun in your home than be protected by it.

You're confusing the name of a party, and it's the Democratic Party moron, with a political philosophy. Democratic of yesteryear, the bigots, were conservatives. Just like today's Republicans.
 
and then, just another lie to add to her abundant list....
Hillary Clinton to Crowd at Fund-Raiser in Los Angeles: Bush Was 'Selected' President, Not Elected; Says Bush's Machine Has Raised Far More Money to 'Ruin the Reputations of Our Candidates'


Oct 27, 2002, 01:00 ET from Newsweek
 
What are you talking about?

No one is saying that Trump can't make challenges according to the laws.

They're balking at the idea that he won't commit to conceding the election.

Those are 2 completely different concepts.

Haven't liberals been moaning for 16 years that Bush stole the election lol?

But Trump says he's going to wait and see how it turns out and all of a sudden the sky is falling. Face it, it was a lame attempt to drum up some faux outrage to damage Trump.
 
Haven't liberals been moaning for 16 years that Bush stole the election lol?

But Trump says he's going to wait and see how it turns out and all of a sudden the sky is falling. Face it, it was a lame attempt to drum up some faux outrage to damage Trump.

Supporters & partisans always dispute elections, and for years say things like "he's not my President."

To try to equate the 2 is hopelessly naive. We have a LONG tradition of the losing candidate conceding the election, and as many on both sides have said today, it's very important to the process. After contentious elections, the nation needs to heal a bit and come together. True leaders recognize that, and step up to the plate.
 
Supporters & partisans always dispute elections, and for years say things like "he's not my President."

To try to equate the 2 is hopelessly naive. We have a LONG tradition of the losing candidate conceding the election, and as many on both sides have said today, it's very important to the process. After contentious elections, the nation needs to heal a bit and come together. True leaders recognize that, and step up to the plate.

Equate this...

2002---Hillary Clinton to Crowd at Fund-Raiser in Los Angeles: Bush Was 'Selected' President, Not Elected

Equate this....
11 years after his election loss to George W. Bush in 2004, Kerry still believes he was robbed via systematic fraud.

 
Supporters & partisans always dispute elections, and for years say things like "he's not my President."

To try to equate the 2 is hopelessly naive. We have a LONG tradition of the losing candidate conceding the election, and as many on both sides have said today, it's very important to the process. After contentious elections, the nation needs to heal a bit and come together. True leaders recognize that, and step up to the plate.

Always the hysteria with liberals. Even assuming Trump refuses to concede, what's he going to do? Go pound sand lol?

There's not a thing he can do about it. And besides, it's not what he said.
 
I don't even think the bolded is significant enough to qualify as hairsplitting.

Gore contested the election as was his right why would trump give up his right to contest an election that is so obviously rigged? This is yet another act of blatant hypocrisy on the left and a non-story being used as a distraction by the DNC controlled MSM from the fact that Trump kicked her ass in the debate, to distract from the wikileaks releases proving numerous felonies and media collusion with her campaign (but the Russians but the Russians!) to distract from the O'Keefe tapes proving the Clinton campaign hired homeless and the mentally ill to infiltrate Trump rallies to cause violence, to distract from the FOIA FBI releases proving the DOS attempted quid pro quo negotiations with the FBI in order to declassify documents because they knew Clinton committed several felonies and jeopardized national security with her illegal server etc etc et al.

When this election is stolen I hope Trump not only contests it but calls for armed revolution against the Media Academic Governmental Global-Corporatist Complex which the wikileaks release proves conclusively has bought and payed for the Clinton Presidency through million dollar speaking fees and the Clinton Slush Fund Foundation.
 
Gore contested the election as was his right why would trump give up his right to contest an election that is so obviously rigged? This is yet another act of blatant hypocrisy on the left and a non-story being used as a distraction by the DNC controlled MSM from the fact that Trump kicked her ass in the debate, to distract from the wikileaks releases proving numerous felonies and media collusion with her campaign (but the Russians but the Russians!) to distract from the O'Keefe tapes proving the Clinton campaign hired homeless and the mentally ill to infiltrate Trump rallies to cause violence, to distract from the FOIA FBI releases proving the DOS attempted quid pro quo negotiations with the FBI in order to declassify documents because they knew Clinton committed several felonies and jeopardized national security with her illegal server etc etc et al.

When this election is stolen I hope Trump not only contests it but calls for armed revolution against the Media Academic Governmental Global-Corporatist Complex which the wikileaks release proves conclusively has bought and payed for the Clinton Presidency through million dollar speaking fees and the Clinton Slush Fund Foundation.

Don't say that lol. It only feeds their hysteria.
 
Maybe Thingy can give us the Trump quote from the debate that would prove his claim......

then again, maybe he can't.
 
What is ambiguous about this exchange?

Wallace: "Do you make the same commitment that you will absolutely accept the results of this election?"

Trump: "I will look at it at the time. What I've seen is so bad..."

Wallace: "There is a tradition in this country...is the peaceful transition of power, and that no matter how hard-fought a campaign is, that at the end of the campaign, that the loser concedes to the winner...and that the country comes together."

Trump: "I will tell you at the time. I will keep you in suspense."

Here you go, bravs.

You guys really just look like hopeless partisans trying to cover for him. This isn't just libbies & the media. MANY conservatives have come out against this.
 
Back
Top