Phoenix speech

A wall is going to cost over $10 billion. $200 million in aid money isn't going to make a dent.

Well that and $10 per head might though. How many people go through that border every year?

Sent from my Lenovo K50-t5 using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:
what i dont understand is how you can be for raising wages but also for allowing illegals which dont have to be paid minimum wage. If you believe some jobs cant be paid minimum wage then the minimum wage is too high right? According to your logic :)


Make them legal, problem solved.
 
If it's scripted and prepared, I will probably like it, as I have enjoyed all of his other academic speeches. It's when he just shouts off-the-cuff that I just shake my head at the dumbass.

It beats watching the sociopathic lying Shrillary spew lie after lie while giving off that shrill boring monotone. ;)
 
Like another poster said, "nice to know even Mexico accepts the fact of a wall".

There are certainly challenges to building a wall that is not only functional, but as aesthetic as possible. Then there's the Rio Grande.


Paying for the wall is a walk in the park.


And the mountains and the deserts. We already have something people might refer to as a wall, but there is never going to be one across the entire border. It's a very stupid idea and will be far too expensive.
 
Well that and $10 per head might though. How many people go thorough that border every year?

Sent from my Lenovo K50-t5 using Tapatalk

Paying for the wall isn't the problem preventing its construction, corruption is. Immigration has merely been a political football. Trump is changing that because he's not beholding to special interest. I believe this election will be an actual game changer on many fronts, not only immigration.
 
A wall is going to cost over $10 billion. $200 million in aid money isn't going to make a dent.

It's definitely going to be more than 10 billion. You could not cover the rest of the border with that fence for 10 billion and my impression was that Trump was planning something far bigger than that.
 
So he's not even for legal status? So full deportation.

Not sure he's going to get any latino support, since all they vote for is the amnesty giver. Which will be corrupt Hitlery.

Millions of Latino's agree with him who have come here LEGALLY. I think most LEGAL immigrants have issues with people getting in the easy way without paying or waiting. Liberals, they see illegals as a vast untapped low information voting constituency.
 
ive heard someone say that if we tax wire and bank transfers illegals would send their money to mexico via mules to avoid the 5 dollar fee which is lol.


Or they will just use illegal/informal wiring services. You seem to be very stupid but the Mexicans that "took your jarb!" are not.

http://dailysignal.com/2016/02/25/th...al-immigrants/

Another challenge with tracking the scope of money sent overseas is that while most remittances are thought to be sent through formal channels such as banks, credit unions, and wire and postal services that are regulated by the federal government, some is transferred using informal services, without oversight.

One of these unregulated systems, known as hawala, has been the subject of recent attention in the media because of its use by people fleeing war-torn Middle East countries for Europe.

Hawala enables users to transfer money from one point to another without either side having a bank account, thus leaving no paper trail and operating outside the law.
...
In one of its reports, released this month, the GAO speculated that imposing a fine on remittances against people without legal status could encourage them to send money home using unregulated services such as hawala rather than going through traditional methods.

People using the informal services could not be subjected to the fines because there’s no way to enforce them.

So if more people choose to remit using unenforced systems, the revenue generated from the fines would be minimal, the GAO predicts.

In addition, the GAO reports that it’s difficult to know how many migrants use regulated methods to transfer money home, and how many go around them, so limited information exists about the immigration status of those who are currently remitting.
 
Or they will just use illegal/informal wiring services. You seem to be very stupid but the Mexicans that "took your jarb!" are not.

http://dailysignal.com/2016/02/25/th...al-immigrants/

Another challenge with tracking the scope of money sent overseas is that while most remittances are thought to be sent through formal channels such as banks, credit unions, and wire and postal services that are regulated by the federal government, some is transferred using informal services, without oversight.

One of these unregulated systems, known as hawala, has been the subject of recent attention in the media because of its use by people fleeing war-torn Middle East countries for Europe.

Hawala enables users to transfer money from one point to another without either side having a bank account, thus leaving no paper trail and operating outside the law.
...
In one of its reports, released this month, the GAO speculated that imposing a fine on remittances against people without legal status could encourage them to send money home using unregulated services such as hawala rather than going through traditional methods.

People using the informal services could not be subjected to the fines because there’s no way to enforce them.

So if more people choose to remit using unenforced systems, the revenue generated from the fines would be minimal, the GAO predicts.

In addition, the GAO reports that it’s difficult to know how many migrants use regulated methods to transfer money home, and how many go around them, so limited information exists about the immigration status of those who are currently remitting.

"unregulated services" meaning the money could never get to the point of destination and the only recourse you have when they dont is to cry.

Again there is a reason you use moneygram/western union/banks.
 
Trump is killing it tonight! I'm telling you, he's going to win.

This is as delusional as it is ridiculous and wrong.

The trip to Mexico was a fiasco, Trump’s speech served only to further exhibit his bigotry, ignorance and hate, and succeeded in only driving away more Hispanic voters and all other voters of good faith who want nothing to do with Trump’s bigotry and hate.
 
This is as delusional as it is ridiculous and wrong.

The trip to Mexico was a fiasco, Trump’s speech served only to further exhibit his bigotry, ignorance and hate, and succeeded in only driving away more Hispanic voters and all other voters of good faith who want nothing to do with Trump’s bigotry and hate.

Take a colonic and call us after the Trump victory.
 
Prominent members of the white supremacist movement applauded Trump’s immigration speech.

David Duke called the speech “excellent.” “I am overjoyed to see Donald Trump embrace most of the issues I’ve championed for years,” Duke said.

Jared Taylor, editor of the white nationalist publication American Renaissance, said it was a “hell of a speech. Almost perfect.”

“Trump is back,” wrote Richard Spencer, president of the National Policy Institute, a white nationalist think tank.

Trump proposed a 10-point plan that would, among other things, build a wall across the United States’ southern border; create a “deportation task force” within the Department of Homeland Security; triple the number of Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents; and immediately begin deporting 2 million “criminal aliens.” Trump did not say how he planned to pay for these initiatives.

The speech was written to appeal to white men, according to Trump confidante Corey Lewandowski. “White males have a high propensity of voting. This speech is clearly geared at those individuals right now, to make sure he has locked them in for the election,” the former Trump campaign manager said on CNN.



http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/david-duke-donald-trump-immigration_us_57c7b4e4e4b0e60d31dd281c?section=&&
 
Back
Top